Categories
Women Empowerment

Where Do Women Stand in India?

Where do women stand in India’s social and political landscape today? The answer is a story of both inspiring progress and ongoing struggle. For generations, Indian women have fought to claim their space in society – from legendary freedom fighters in the Independence movement to modern lawmakers shaping the nation.

A legacy of women leaders in Indian politics

When we look back, women’s participation in Indian politics is anything but static – it’s been a dynamic force growing stronger each decade. Even during the freedom struggle against British colonialism, women played crucial roles: from Sarojini Naidu raising her voice for equality to the fierce leadership of Sucheta Kripalani and Aruna Asaf Ali. These trailblazers proved that women’s leadership was integral to India’s destiny. After independence, India broke global norms by granting universal suffrage to women and men alike from the very first election – a historic step that many Western democracies took decades to achieve. In fact, it was only in 1950 – with the birth of the Republic of India – that all women in India finally won the unconditional right to vote. This early commitment set the stage for women to enter public life as equals in principle, if not always in practice.

Over the years, women have risen to some of the highest offices in the country, shattering glass ceilings that once seemed impenetrable. India was one of the first nations in the world to elect a woman Prime Minister – Indira Gandhi took office in 1966, showing that a woman could lead the world’s largest democracy. Since then, we’ve seen women become Presidents (like Pratibha Patil), powerful Chief Ministers (from Jayalalithaa to Mamata Banerjee) and influential opposition leaders.

At the grassroots too, change was set in motion by progressive policies: the 73rd Constitutional Amendment (1992) reserved one-third of seats in village panchayats for women, a quota later increased to 50% in many states. This means millions of women in rural India have had a chance to serve as village council heads (sarpanchs) and local representatives. From village councils to Parliament, more women than ever before are stepping into leadership roles, determined to shape their communities and country.

Yet alongside these shining examples, the reality for most Indian women remains a mix of advancement and adversity. Today, far more girls attend school and university than in previous generations, and many more women join the workforce and community leadership roles than before. The very sight of women gathering in village meetings or contesting elections – once a rarity – is gradually becoming commonplace. Women in India continue to raise their voices for equal rights and social change, whether on the streets in protest or within the halls of policymaking. But despite this active participation, deep-rooted challenges persist and the journey toward true equality is far from over.

Women representatives participate in a local governance meeting in India, highlighting the growing (if still limited) presence of women in grassroots politics. Over the decades, the numbers tell a story of both progress and disparity. Indian women have proven their resolve by increasingly exercising their right to vote and contest office, but they still struggle to secure a fair share of actual power. In the following sections, we’ll dig into the data on women’s political participation, examine the barriers that continue to hold women back and explore the efforts – from legal reforms to grassroots initiatives – that aim to bridge the gender gap in Indian politics.

By the numbers: Women’s political participation today

In recent years, data shows that women’s political participation in India has been steadily rising, even if representation in power remains skewed. Consider the act of voting – the most fundamental expression of democracy. Women’s voter turnout has climbed dramatically since the early decades of independence. In 1962, only about 46.6% of eligible women cast their ballots, reflecting both social barriers and an enduring gender gap. Fast forward to the latest national election in 2024 and nearly 65.8% of women voters turned out to vote. This surge in female voter participation signifies an important cultural shift.

In fact, the once-wide turnout gap between men and women has virtually evaporated. For the first time in India’s history, women matched or even slightly surpassed men in voting rates in the 2010s – notably in 2019, female voter turnout actually exceeded male turnout (women made up roughly 49.5% of voters that year). Indian women, even in rural and traditionally conservative areas, are increasingly claiming their political voice at the ballot box, often outnumbering men in polling booths and defying anyone who doubts their commitment to democracy.

This growing assertiveness isn’t limited to voting. More women are also stepping forward to contest elections – to not just vote for leaders, but to be the leaders. The change from the past is striking. Back in 1957 (India’s second general election), only 45 women in the entire country ran as candidates for Parliament. At that time, seeing a woman’s name on the ballot was like spotting a unicorn. Fast forward to the 17th and 18th Lok Sabha elections in 2019 and 2024 and the number of women candidates swelled into the hundreds.

In the 2024 general election, 797 women candidates entered the fray out of 8,337 total candidates. That’s a seventeen-fold increase in women’s participation as candidates since the 1950s. It’s an encouraging sign that more women want to run for office and serve, even if many face an uphill battle in the male-dominated arena of electoral politics. For context, women’s share among all candidates was about 9.5% in 2024 – a slight rise from 9% in 2019. Clearly, political parties are still overwhelmingly fielding men, but the needle is slowly moving as women push into these spaces.

Now, how about representation in the legislatures – the people who actually win and hold office? Here too, the trend is upward, though the pace has been agonisingly slow. In 1952, women made up just about 5% of the Lok Sabha, India’s lower house of Parliament. Only 22 women were elected in that first Lok Sabha of independent India, out of 489 MPs. Fast forward over 70 years: in the current Lok Sabha (elected in 2024, the 18th Lok Sabha), 74 women MPs were elected, comprising 13.6% of the house. This is the highest number of women Parliament has ever seen – yet it’s still only one out of every seven MPs.

In fact, women’s representation dipped slightly in 2024 compared to 2019 (when there were 78 women MPs, about 14.4%), reminding us that progress is not always linear. The upper house, Rajya Sabha, has seen a similar gradual rise – from roughly 7% women in the 1950s to about 13% in 2023. These figures underscore a sobering reality: even in 2025, Indian women are vastly underrepresented in the highest corridors of power. A country that had a woman Prime Minister over fifty years ago still hasn’t cracked the code to gender balance in its Parliament.

At the state level and local levels, however, there are some bright spots. Several state assemblies have seen increases in women MLAs (Members of Legislative Assembly), though none have anywhere near parity. But it’s at the level of local governance – the panchayats and municipalities – where India has made a quantum leap, thanks to constitutional quotas. Today, women form almost half of all local government representatives. As of 2023, about 46.6% of the 3.23 million panchayat representatives are women. That’s roughly 1.5 million women leading village councils, sitting in block committees and making decisions for their communities. This is a stunning transformation from a few decades ago when village leadership was almost entirely male.

In many local bodies, reserved seats for women have normalised the presence of sarpanchnis (women village heads) and council members – creating a pipeline of experienced female leaders at the grassroots. In 2022, women made up about 44% of local government representatives nationwide and that share has only grown. This means the face of local governance in India is increasingly female, which could, over time, change attitudes about women in leadership and create bottom-up pressure for greater representation in higher offices.

The data points to an optimistic conclusion: women in India are more politically engaged than ever before – they are voting in massive numbers, contesting elections in greater frequency and gradually winning more positions of power. Each percentage gain represents millions of women’s voices being heard. However, numbers alone don’t tell the full story. A rising graph of participation doesn’t automatically equal real empowerment. To truly understand where women stand in India’s socio-political spaces, we must also confront the harder question: what obstacles are women still facing, and why – despite greater participation – do they remain so underrepresented in actual decision-making? The next section delves into these challenges.

The gender gap and ongoing challenges

For all the gains women have made, stark gender gaps and deep-rooted barriers continue to define their political journey – in India, as in much of the world. It’s a bitter truth that while women make up nearly half of India’s population and voters, they occupy only a small fraction of its power structures.

Globally, women remain underrepresented at all levels of decision-making and India is no exception. According to the World Economic Forum’s latest analysis, at the current rate of progress it will take an estimated 123 years to achieve full gender parity worldwide. (This bleak figure is actually an improvement – it was 132 years as of 2024, so the world inched 9 years closer in the past year.) Still, 123 years is far too long to wait for equal representation. And for many Indian women, the pace of change feels glacial, especially when their daily reality includes discrimination, safety concerns and unequal access to resources.

Let’s talk about Indian politics on the ground – a realm still dominated by men, where women who dare to enter often face hostility or condescension. One major challenge is sheer cultural inertia and patriarchal attitudes. For decades, politics was seen as a “man’s domain,” and vestiges of that mindset linger. Female politicians frequently have to work twice as hard to be taken seriously. They are subjected to sexist remarks, their competence questioned, their private lives scrutinised.

The idea of a woman wielding authority can provoke backlash in a society where many still expect women to be deferential. The system wasn’t built with women in mind and sometimes it shows its teeth to those trying to change it. Indeed, women who speak up or step out of “their place” often face disproportionate criticism and even abuse. It’s not uncommon to see outspoken women leaders being trolled on social media or heckled in legislatures with misogynistic jibes. This toxic environment can discourage women from pursuing public life – yet many persist, fuelled by a desire to change the very system that marginalises them.

One of the most pernicious manifestations of patriarchy in Indian politics is the phenomenon of “proxy women” or Pradhan Pati (literally, “husband of the chief”). This refers to situations – particularly in rural local bodies – where a woman is elected to a position (often due to a reserved seat), but the real power is wielded by her husband or a male relative.

In some village councils, the elected woman sarpanch is essentially a figurehead while her husband (jokingly dubbed the sarpanch pati) sits in on meetings, makes decisions, and signs documents on her behalf. It’s the oldest trick in the patriarchy playbook: satisfy the letter of women’s reservation laws by installing a woman in the seat, but preserve male control behind the scenes. This “proxy politics” undermines the very purpose of empowering women through reservations and unfortunately it’s widespread in certain areas.

As one government report noted, women constitute nearly 46% of panchayat representatives, “however, their effective participation remains low, especially in northern states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, and Rajasthan, where male relatives often control decision-making”. The term Pradhan Pati has entered the political lexicon to name and shame this practice. It highlights how deeply entrenched gender norms can subvert progressive laws – families and communities may feel uncomfortable with women in power, so they enforce the old norms by propping up the men in the shadows.

Women serving in local office often face immense pressure from family and community to act as rubber stamps. Interference by husbands or male kin not only robs women of agency but also robs the community of genuine female leadership. As a result, many women representatives struggle to exercise their authority. They are talked over in meetings, excluded from important discussions or simply ordered by their family on how to vote or govern. It’s common to hear anecdotes of a villager approaching the husband of a woman pradhan to get things done – because everyone “knows” he’s the real boss. This is profoundly disempowering for women who genuinely want to lead. It also shows that changing laws (like introducing quotas) is not enough on its own; social attitudes have to evolve so that a woman leader is respected in her own right.

Additionally, lack of support and resources holds many women back. Politics is a game that often runs on money, connections and the old boys’ network. Women, who historically have had less access to financial resources and public networks, find it harder to fund their campaigns or connect to mentors. Political parties – the gatekeepers of electoral tickets – often hesitate to nominate women in winnable seats. Some party leaders still harbour biases that women are “weak candidates” or won’t be able to handle the rough-and-tumble of electoral combat. This results in women being passed over for party tickets or being fielded in unwinnable constituencies as token candidates.

The old prejudiced question, “Can she win?” still hangs over women aspirants, even when data shows women legislators perform as well or better than their male counterparts when given a chance. There’s also a networking gap – many male politicians groom their sons or younger male colleagues to succeed them, whereas women often lack similar patronage. The absence of adequate support systems – from funding to security to mentorship – means women entering politics must often blaze a trail on their own.

Another harsh reality: violence and safety concerns. Politics in some parts of India can be violent and women candidates have faced harassment, threats and even physical assault. In areas with intense political rivalries, a woman canvassing door-to-door might fear for her safety in ways her male colleagues don’t. Online violence is another modern scourge – women in public life are routinely subjected to trolling, abuse and threats on social media, with attacks often targeting their gender or personal life. This creates a chilling effect, as some women decide the mental toll of a public role is simply too high.

Finally, the double burden of domestic responsibilities cannot be ignored. Society still largely expects women to be primary caregivers and homemakers. Thus, a woman in politics often juggles multiple roles – managing her household and children alongside a demanding public career. The long hours and travel that political life entails can strain family life, and without supportive partners or infrastructure (like childcare), many women simply cannot afford to devote themselves fully to politics. It’s a classic Catch-22: we need more women in leadership to push for policies (like childcare, flexible work, parental leave) that would help ease these burdens, but the burdens themselves make it harder for women to ascend to leadership.

One might imagine the everyday heroism of women who persist despite these challenges: the young woman sarpanch who studies government manuals at night because her husband never lets her speak in meetings; the female MP who endures jeers in Parliament with steely grace; the first-time candidate who campaigns with a baby on her hip because she has no alternative. These stories exemplify both the resilience of Indian women and the unfair weight placed upon them.

The Indian government and civil society are aware of many of these issues, and there have been efforts to address them. For instance, a government panel in 2023 recommended “exemplary penalties” for those caught engaging in proxy leadership, to crack down on the Pradhan Pati culture. They suggested measures like publicly swearing in women leaders in open village assemblies (to affirm that she holds the office), appointing women-only ombudspersons to hear complaints and even creating support networks and training for elected women. The logic is clear: it’s not enough to reserve seats for women; we must ensure women can actually exercise the power of those seats.

Similarly, activists and NGOs are conducting leadership workshops for women in local government, teaching them about their legal powers, budgeting and public speaking, and crucially, how to push back when someone tries to usurp their role. These efforts, though on a modest scale, are vital sparks of change.

The United Nations and other international bodies have also emphasised the importance of women’s equal participation. UN Women has repeatedly stated that women’s underrepresentation in decision-making is a loss for society and achieving gender parity in political life is a prerequisite for true democracy and sustainable development.

The World Economic Forum’s Gender Gap Report ranks countries on political empowerment – and India currently ranks low (in 2023, India was 127th out of 146 countries on overall gender gap, with particularly poor scores in political representation). This is a reminder that India, despite being the world’s largest democracy, has much work to do to ensure that its democracy is inclusive of all its citizens.

In summary, women in India stand at a crossroads of change. They have made significant strides in participation and visibility, yet they continue to battle systemic sexism and structural barriers that men do not face. The gender gap in politics is about power, attitude and culture. Bridging it requires a transformation in how we as a society view women as leaders.

Pushing forward: Reforms and the road ahead

The challenges are steep, but they are not insurmountable. History shows that change is possible when pushed by collective will and bold reforms. To truly elevate women’s position in India’s political sphere, a multi-pronged approach is needed – combining legal mandates, institutional reforms and social initiatives. This means tackling the problem at all levels: from Parliament down to the village and from political parties to households.

A critical step that has long been discussed, and finally saw a breakthrough, is the idea of reservations (quotas) for women in state and national legislatures. For decades, activists and progressive politicians campaigned for a Women’s Reservation Bill that would reserve 33% of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies for women (similar to the quota in panchayats). After many false starts, this historic reform was passed by Parliament in 2023. The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023 – often hailed as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam – became law, aiming to ensure that one-third of all seats in the national and state legislatures will be earmarked for women. If implemented, it could swiftly raise women’s representation in the Lok Sabha from the current ~14% to at least 33% – the biggest leap in history. It’s as if the political map of India is being redrawn with women at the centre.

However, the bill comes with its own caveats and timeline (its provisions will be enacted after the next delimitation of constituencies, which means it may not take effect until a future general election, possibly 2029). The journey from 13.6% to 33% representation will still take time and political will to realise. Activists are urging that the implementation be expedited and not lost in procedural delays. Passing a law is only half the battle; enforcing it is the next. Still, the very passage of the Women’s Reservation Bill marks a paradigm shift. It’s an official acknowledgment that extraordinary measures are required to correct the historical imbalance.

It is turning the slow drip of progress into a fire hose – forcing open the gates for women to enter en masse into decision-making roles. If one out of every three lawmakers in India is a woman in the near future, it could profoundly change not just legislation on women’s issues, but the very culture of policy-making (potentially making it more collaborative and inclusive, as some studies suggest happens with more women at the table).

Yet, quotas alone won’t solve everything. Political empowerment must be accompanied by social, economic and cultural empowerment. There’s a saying: “Give a woman a seat at the table and then watch to ensure she isn’t on the menu.” Women who enter politics need an environment that allows them to thrive and lead effectively. This is where capacity-building and support systems become crucial. We need robust programmes to train and mentor aspiring women leaders.

Imagine leadership development workshops across the country, where experienced women politicians and professionals coach younger women in public speaking, navigating party structures, crafting policy and running effective campaigns. Some of this is already happening in pockets – for instance, the government committee on Panchayati Raj recommended creating federations of women panchayat leaders for peer support and partnering with educational institutions to provide leadership training for women in local office.

Similarly, civil society organisations are running “campaign schools” for women, teaching them practical skills like filing nominations, fundraising and using social media for outreach. Expanding these training programmes nationally could massively boost women’s confidence and competence in the political arena. When a woman knows her stuff – knows the rules, the procedures, the tricks of the trade – it’s much harder for others to sideline her.

Mentorship is another key. Every successful person in politics often has a mentor or a guide. Creating mentorship networks that pair young female political aspirants with seasoned women leaders can help transfer knowledge and create solidarity. Senior women who have broken barriers can lend a hand to the next generation, advising them on handling both policy issues and bias they will inevitably face.

In an ideal scenario, each political party would have a structured mentorship and training wing for women – identifying promising talent at the grassroots and grooming them for larger roles. This is not wishful thinking; some parties have started women’s wings and leadership programs, but these efforts need to be more than symbolic. Parties must also walk the talk when it comes to candidate selection. One concrete ask from activists is for parties to voluntarily field women in at least 33% of the constituencies, even before the reservation law compels them to. This means winnable seats, not just token contests.

A few parties in recent state elections have indeed given 40–50% tickets to women (with notable success – women candidates often have a higher win ratio). It’s time this becomes the norm, not the exception, across the political spectrum. Voters, too, can play a role by demanding their parties put forward more women and by supporting women candidates at the polls.

Another area of focus should be strengthening laws and mechanisms to ensure women’s safety and dignity in politics. This includes stricter action against those who harass or assault female candidates and better enforcement of codes of conduct to prevent sexist hate speech during campaigns. The Election Commission of India could consider guidelines to rein in candidates who make misogynistic comments or attempts to intimidate women opponents.

On the logistical side, providing facilities like childcare or flexible meeting times can make it easier for women (especially young mothers) to participate in politics. Some local bodies have experimented with creches at panchayat meeting venues – small steps like these send a powerful message that women are welcome and accommodated in these spaces, not just reluctantly tolerated.

Education and awareness campaigns at the community level are also vital. If a village’s elders understand that a woman sarpanch has the same authority as any man, they might be less likely to default to the husband for decisions. Public campaigns to celebrate women leaders or community dialogues about the value of women’s leadership, can slowly chip away at societal biases. The media, too, has a role: representation of women politicians in media should move beyond focusing on what they wear or their family background and instead highlight their work and impact. Visible success stories of women leaders can inspire others and change perceptions.

The road ahead requires a coalition of stakeholders – government, civil society, communities and women themselves – pushing together. It means not just top-down reforms, but bottom-up societal change. Revolutions don’t happen by waiting politely; they happen by persistent pressure and rebellious hope. Indian women and their allies must keep the pressure on – to implement the reservation law quickly, to hold parties accountable, and to challenge sexist norms wherever they see them. Each barrier knocked down creates momentum for the next.

Women as agents of change

Amid these systemic efforts, it’s important to remember that women are not just beneficiaries of change – they are often the drivers of change themselves. Across the globe and in India, women have proven themselves indispensable agents of change, activism and social transformation. Whenever society has moved forward – whether in movements against colonialism, fights for civil rights or struggles for environmental justice – women have been on the frontlines, leading with courage and compassion. They have organised communities, challenged oppressive systems and advocated for the marginalised.

In India, think of the Chipko movement in the 1970s where village women literally hugged trees to prevent deforestation or the anti-liquor agitations led by women that spurred social reform in states like Andhra Pradesh. From grassroot activism to policy innovation, women’s contributions have been game-changing. They bring perspectives that prioritise community well-being, inclusivity and long-term thinking – qualities the world desperately needs in leadership.

Women activists and leaders also often embed storytelling in their approach to change. They use the power of personal narrative and empathy to rally others. Whether it’s a mother advocating for better sanitation in her village by recounting how lack of toilets affected her daughters or a young parliamentarian sharing her journey to inspire schoolgirls, these stories break through cynicism and inspire action. Stories have the power to transform hearts and transformed hearts change the world.

While discussing activism, it’s crucial to highlight that women’s empowerment is not just a political issue, but a social one that touches education, health and economic independence. Empowerment is holistic: a woman who is educated, healthy and financially independent is more likely to participate in politics and community leadership. Recognising this, many organisations in India are working at the grassroots to enable women to stand on their feet and raise their voices. One such initiative is the Swabhiman programme by Smile Foundation – a flagship women’s empowerment program that epitomises the idea of change starting from within communities.

Swabhiman (meaning “self-respect” or “pride”) was launched in 2005 to bridge the very gaps that hold women back, especially in underserved communities. The philosophy is equip women with the resources, knowledge and skills they need to become self-reliant change-makers. This involves ensuring access to education, because knowledge truly is power. The programme helps girls and young women pursue schooling and vocational training – whether it’s computer courses, tailoring or financial literacy – opening up economic opportunities for them.

Economic independence is a game changer for women. When a woman earns her own income, she gains confidence, bargaining power in her family and the freedom to make life choices. Swabhiman focuses on exactly this, helping women get job-ready or start small enterprises so they can support themselves and their families. Over the years, tens of thousands of women have received vocational training through Swabhiman, turning their talents into livelihoods.

Equally important is health and nutrition, an often overlooked facet of empowerment. A woman who is chronically ill or malnourished cannot participate fully in public life. Swabhiman’s community health workers visit neighbourhoods to educate women about reproductive health, maternal care and nutrition. They organise health camps and connect women to medical services, ensuring they and their children stay healthy. This not only improves quality of life but also frees women from the constant worry of illness, allowing them to focus on personal growth and civic engagement. As an example, through health and nutrition counselling, thousands of women have learned about family planning and child healthcare, leading to better outcomes for entire communities.

What’s truly inspiring is how Swabhiman fosters leadership at the grassroots level. The programme forms women’s groups and community networks. Women who once rarely stepped out of their homes are now attending weekly meetings, voicing their concerns and learning to solve problems collectively. They discuss issues like local sanitation, girls’ education or domestic violence, and they approach local authorities as a united front to demand action.

In essence, these women are practising politics at the micro level – getting a taste of advocacy and governance in their own communities. Many have gone on to become community leaders, such as members of school committees or health volunteers, and a few have even contested local elections, emboldened by the confidence and support system they developed.

The ripple effects of empowering one woman are immense. Take, for instance, the story of Shyama from Haryana (one of the women highlighted by Swabhiman’s Stories of Change). During the COVID-19 pandemic, Shyama’s husband lost his job and her family was pushed to the brink. Through Swabhiman, Shyama accessed a vocational course in tailoring and was provided initial support to start a small tailoring business at home. She not only earned income to sustain her family through the crisis, but she also gained a newfound confidence.

Today, Shyama trains other village women in stitching and together they’ve formed a self-help group to sell handcrafted garments. Her journey from a housewife with no say in family finances to an entrepreneur and mentor is a testament to what empowerment programmes can achieve. There are countless such stories – of Yashoda in Bengaluru, who used health workshops to become a community health advocate after seeing her family struggle or Ishwati in Maharashtra, who transformed from a daily wage laborer to a savvy small business owner with a micro-loan and training. Each story echoes the truth that when women are given knowledge and opportunity, they uplift not only themselves but everyone around them.

Programmes like Swabhiman illustrate the power of investing in women at the grassroots. They address the interconnected challenges of gender inequality – education gaps, lack of skills, poor health, social norms – in a holistic way. By doing so, they create a pathway to dignity and equality for women who have been on the margins. An educated, skilled, healthy woman with self-confidence is far more likely to assert her rights, participate in local governance or even pursue a political career.

In other words, the seeds of future women leaders are being sown in these community programmes today. The women who learn to raise their voice in a community meeting might tomorrow raise their voice in a state assembly.

These women are living proof that empowerment is not a top-down gift but a bottom-up revolution. When women stand up for themselves, they inevitably stand up for broader social progress, be it in fighting poverty, improving healthcare or demanding justice. We see this in how empowered women invest in their children’s education, campaign against social evils like child marriage and form the backbone of grassroots movements. They are the unsung heroes making daily revolutions in homes and neighbourhoods, which eventually ripple out to transform society.

In conclusion, where do women stand in India? They stand at the forefront of change – as voters, leaders, activists, mothers, workers, dreamers and doers. They stand on the shoulders of the giants who came before (the freedom fighters, the pioneers in politics) and they stand arm-in-arm with each other, forging a path where none existed. India’s socio-political landscape is being slowly reshaped by their hands. Every additional percentage of women voting, every new woman elected to office, every girl who finishes school, every woman who learns a skill and gains confidence – these are the foundation blocks of a more just and equal India.

Women’s participation is growing, their voices getting louder. But the work is far from finished. The halls of power are still largely male, and centuries-old patriarchal attitudes don’t vanish overnight. The promising laws and policies (from reservations in Panchayats to the new Women’s Reservation Bill) now need faithful implementation and societal support. The challenges of proxy power, gender bias and violence must be met with firm resolve and innovative solutions.

Yet, if there is one thing to be optimistic about, it is the indomitable spirit of Indian women. They have shown that they will not be passive or silent. Whether it’s a village woman asserting herself in a Gram Sabha or the women’s movements that have swept urban streets on issues of safety and equality, there is a relentless energy pushing forward. Each generation of women builds on the victories of the last and breaks new ground for the next.

It is the hope that keeps a woman contesting an election she’s told she can’t win, the hope that fuels activists demanding a seat at the table and the hope passed to a young girl that she can be anything she wants – even the Prime Minister. And it is collective action that will turn that hope into reality: action by women and men, by communities and leaders, to ensure women are not just standing, but thriving and leading in every arena of Indian life.

In the final reckoning, empowering women is not a zero-sum game – it uplifts entire families, communities and the nation. As more women take their rightful place in India’s socio-political spaces, India’s democracy itself becomes more vibrant, responsive and just. The road to equality may be long, but with each step taken by strong women (and supportive allies), the destination draws nearer. Where do women stand in India? They stand resolutely on the frontlines of change and if we listen to their voices and support their rise, they will lead India to a brighter, more equitable future for all.

Sources:

  • Firstpost – Women in Indian Politics: A story that has changed little over the years
  • Indian Express – From 1951-2019: How women voters outnumbered men in Lok Sabha polls
  • Indian Express – Govt panel proposes ‘exemplary penalties’ for husband proxies running panchayats
  • Drishti IAS – Issue of Pradhan Pati in Panchayats (analysis of proxy leadership in local bodies)
  • World Economic Forum – Global Gender Gap Report 2025: Key Findings
  • NextIAS Current Affairs – Women’s Political Participation in India (summary of female voter turnout trends)
  • Shankar IAS Parliament – Women’s Participation in Politics (historical Lok Sabha representation data and global comparison)
  • Hindustan Times – 22 in 1951 to 78 in 2019: How has India fared in electing women? (historical data on women MPs in Lok Sabha)
  • Smile Foundation – Women Empowerment Programme – Swabhiman (programme description and impact statistics)
Categories
Education

How Closing One Primary School Changes Life for the Worse?

In Joynagar and Kadamtoli — two villages in Bangladesh’s Kachua upazila — the closure of a single school did more than halt classes. It ripped a seam in the community life. The effects are not contained to the children who once filled its benches. They spread into homes, businesses and the ambitions of a generation that will now come of age without the anchor of a nearby school.

We talk a lot about access to education in the abstract — about literacy rates and enrolment figures, about Sustainable Development Goal 4’s promise of inclusive, quality education for all by 2030. But the conversation rarely lingers on the lived reality of what happens when that access is physically removed. This is the story we avoid because it forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth that losing one rural primary school can erase decades of progress, not just for individual children but for entire communities.

A symbol of hope, born from the ground up

The story of this school began not with a government budget but with a gift of land. In 2004, local social worker Abdur Rahim Patwary and other community members pooled 20 decimals of land so children could learn without walking miles. It was a humble building — three classrooms, a handful of teachers, 200 eager pupils. For a brief time, the school was a living proof of what collective action can achieve.

Then, two years later, the money ran out. The bureaucratic support never arrived. And one day, the gates closed. No formal announcement, no relocation plan. Just an absence that settled into everyday life, quietly rearranging futures.

Primary school education interrupted, lives derailed

When a rural primary school closes, children don’t simply move to the next nearest one. In practice, it means longer walks — often along unsafe or flood-prone routes — or prohibitive transport costs. Parents, weighing the risks, sometimes decide it’s safer or cheaper to keep children at home.

For girls, the consequences are especially severe. In the absence of a local school, concerns about safety and propriety rise. Early marriages become more likely. Household work replaces homework. Over time, the educational gap between boys and girls widens, entrenching inequality for another generation.

And the impact is not only academic. Rural schools are often the hub for vaccination drives, midday meal schemes and community meetings. Their closure cuts off these lifelines, leaving a void in both services and social connection.

The quiet economics of school closures

Education experts often frame school closures as an educational crisis. But they’re also an economic one. In Joynagar and Kadamtoli, families with means began migrating to areas with better schools. Property values dipped. Local shops saw fewer customers. The absence of young families made it harder to justify investment in roads, water systems or even internet connectivity.

This is the downward spiral rarely captured in policy debates: the loss of a school accelerates rural decline. It’s not just that children lose lessons; it’s that entire villages lose reasons to stay, invest and grow.

The teachers left behind

When the school closed, its teachers — once community pillars — were left jobless. Many had no choice but to move away or take up work unrelated to education. The loss isn’t just about headcount; it’s about mentorship, continuity and the trust built between educators and families over years.

A national problem in microcosm

The case of Joynagar and Kadamtoli is not an anomaly. Across South Asia, rural school closures are becoming more frequent — often justified under the logic of “rationalisation” or budget efficiency. But these closures disproportionately hit low-income and marginalised communities, the very groups most at risk of being left behind.

Globally, UNESCO estimates that 272 million children and young people are out of school — a 3% rise since 2015, reversing hard-won gains. In countries like India and Bangladesh, where rural populations remain large, the loss of a local school can set back not just educational attainment but public health, gender equality and economic resilience.

The human cost behind the numbers

The children affected by school closures don’t fade neatly into statistics. In Joynagar, one girl now spends her mornings collecting water instead of learning to read. A boy who used to dream of becoming a doctor now helps his father in the fields. These shifts may seem small to outsiders, but they shape trajectories in permanent ways.

When a child misses the foundation years of education, catching up becomes exponentially harder. Illiteracy limits job opportunities, reduces awareness of rights and keeps families locked in poverty. The deprivation is quiet, almost invisible to those outside the village — but its effects will echo for decades.

The missing safety net

It shouldn’t take the personal intervention of a new upazila education officer to reopen a school. Yet in Joynagar, that’s exactly what locals are hoping for. They’ve submitted a petition. The officer has promised a site visit. It’s a small step, but it reveals the fragility of rural educational infrastructure: without sustained funding and oversight, these institutions can vanish overnight.

National education policy often assumes that if a school closes, children will simply transfer elsewhere. But this ignores the realities of rural geography, poverty and gender norms. What’s missing is a mandatory safety net: a guarantee that no community will be left without a functioning primary school within accessible distance.

A matter of justice

We often talk about education as a human right. But rights are only as strong as the systems that uphold them. Closing a rural school without a plan for immediate replacement is not just a logistical oversight — it’s a breach of that right.

The irony is painful: in a world obsessed with digital progress and AI breakthroughs, there are children counting on their fingers because they don’t own a notebook.

From loss to action

Not all is despair. Initiatives like Smile Foundation’s Shiksha Na Ruke are stepping into the breach, helping children in difficult circumstances continue their studies through community-based learning kits, mentorship and alternative learning centres. But these are stopgaps, not substitutes for a functioning public education system.

If we are serious about meeting SDG 4, the starting point is deceptively simple: keep existing schools open. Fund them adequately. Staff them with trained teachers. Make closure the absolute last resort, not the first budget-cut option.

Because when a school disappears, the loss is not contained to a building. It’s in the wedding of a 14-year-old girl who might have been a teacher. It’s in the empty shop on the village’s main road. It’s in the silence where children’s voices used to rise in chorus, reciting lessons they believed would take them somewhere.

If you are a policymaker: write protection clauses into education budgets. If you are a philanthropist or corporate leader: fund not just new schools but the survival of existing ones. If you are a citizen: ask your elected representatives what they are doing to prevent closures in the most vulnerable areas.

Because in Joynagar and Kadamtoli, the community’s future is hanging on whether those gates will ever open again. And in thousands of villages like them, the story is the same.

The question is whether we’ll notice before the silence spreads.

Categories
Education

One Teacher and One School: A Failing Model

By the time India’s children in metro cities sit down in air-conditioned classrooms with smart boards, interactive modules and specialised subject teachers, millions of their peers in rural, tribal and remote areas have already faced their first educational barrier of the day – a school with only one teacher

Far from being a rare aberration, the single-teacher school has become entrenched in India’s rural education landscape. It is a symptom of systemic neglect — a gap not just in resources, but in political will.

The hidden architecture of educational inequality

The concept of a “school” conjures up an image of multiple classrooms, teachers and a structured timetable. In much of rural India, this is fiction. Here, one teacher is responsible for everything: teaching multiple grades and subjects, managing attendance records, administering midday meals, maintaining the school premises and often doubling as the community’s go-to liaison for government schemes.

The impact on learning outcomes is immediate and damaging. Multi-grade teaching without adequate support leads to shallow, fragmented instruction. Foundational literacy and numeracy suffer, lessons are interrupted for administrative duties and children are often dismissed early after lunch. This environment erodes parental trust and fuels dropout rates, creating a generational cycle of exclusion.

What the data tells us

The Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE) 2021–22 reveals an uncomfortable truth:

  • Jharkhand has the highest proportion of single-teacher schools in central India — 30.9% of government primary schools, with each teacher serving an average of 46 students.
  • Andhra Pradesh (33.9%), Telangana (30.3%), Karnataka (29%), Rajasthan (27.2%) and Himachal Pradesh (28.2%) also have alarming ratios.
  • Even states with a lower percentage face extreme overcrowding — in Bihar, 9.7% of schools have a single teacher, but each serves an average of 96 students; Uttar Pradesh sees 70 students per teacher in these cases.
  • Kerala remains an outlier with only 4% single-teacher schools, averaging just 10 students each.

These figures point to a clear inequity: poorer, rural and tribal communities are consistently underserved, perpetuating an educational geography of neglect.

Mini-schools vs. Single-teacher schools — A policy blind spot

One of the more pernicious issues in policy discourse is the conflation of “mini-schools” with single-teacher schools. Mini-schools were intended as temporary setups in sparsely populated areas, a stop-gap measure before full-fledged facilities could be established.

The Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, mandated a minimum of two qualified teachers per school — not as a recommendation, but as a legal requirement. Yet, more than a decade later, the mini-school model has not been phased out. Instead, many such setups have simply been reclassified as single-teacher schools without the necessary upgrades.

Economist and education activist Dr. Jean Drèze underscores the distinction: “Mini-schools are easy to identify. The problem of single-teacher schools is much larger, certainly in Jharkhand.” This conflation allows policymakers to downplay the scale of the crisis and delay systemic reform.

Why this model fails the RTE promise

At its core, the single-teacher model undermines the RTE’s objective of equitable, quality education. Multi-grade classrooms without pedagogical support limit individualised learning. Teacher burnout is inevitable, with educators juggling lesson planning, supervision, administration and even non-academic community tasks.

The absence of co-teachers means there is no peer collaboration to improve methods, no safety net in emergencies and no scope for co-curricular learning. Girls, in particular, face higher risks — from lack of supervision to early withdrawal from school. Over time, the model entrenches educational inequities, reducing the odds of upward mobility for marginalised children.

The case for investing in teacher capacity

Global research from the World Bank and UNESCO repeatedly shows that teacher quality is the single most important school-based factor in student learning. But quality is inseparable from adequate staffing.

Reform must go beyond filling vacancies. It requires:

  • Targeted recruitment in underserved regions, with incentives for qualified teachers to work in rural and tribal areas.
  • Structured mentorship for first-time teachers to navigate multi-grade classrooms effectively.
  • Administrative support staff to free teachers from non-teaching burdens.
  • Community engagement to build parental trust and reinforce attendance.

Smile Foundation’s Mission Education Model

While government systems struggle to reform at scale, civil society organisations are stepping in to innovate. Smile Foundation’s Mission Education programme is one such intervention.

Instead of accepting the isolation of the single-teacher model, it builds collaborative ecosystems. Local educators — often called change-makers — are trained in child-friendly, activity-based methods that work in multi-grade settings. They receive ongoing capacity-building, mentoring and monitoring. Volunteers, digital tools and parent committees form a support network, ensuring no teacher is left to manage alone.

In rural communities, this model has demonstrated higher retention rates, improved foundational learning and greater parental involvement. Most importantly, it restores dignity and motivation to teaching — conditions without which no reform can succeed.

Only one teacher: Breaking the cycle of neglect

Addressing the single-teacher crisis is not just about meeting the RTE’s legal mandate. It is about redefining rural education as a public good worthy of the same investment, planning and innovation that urban schooling receives.

This means political prioritisation — teacher recruitment as a budgetary imperative, not a discretionary expense. It means policy clarity — separating the mini-school model from single-teacher schools to ensure targeted interventions. And it means partnerships — leveraging the expertise of NGOs like Smile Foundation to demonstrate scalable, community-led solutions.

If India is serious about equitable growth, it cannot afford to leave its most marginalised children in classrooms where one overburdened adult is expected to carry the weight of an entire education system. The single-teacher school is not a model; it is a warning. And we ignore it at our peril.

Categories
Smile

Rethinking Postgraduate Education in India

India loves its degrees. From the bustle of Tier-II towns to the lanes of metropolitan coaching hubs, an M.A., M.Com., M.Sc. or MBA is often seen as the ticket to upward mobility. Families make sacrifices, students invest years of their youth and the state pours staggering sums of public money into postgraduate education.

But when you scratch the surface, a troubling paradox emerges. Postgraduate education in India is overfunded but underperforming. Despite heavy subsidies, outcomes remain weak. Graduates struggle with underemployment, universities underdeliver on research and society at large reaps little return on investment.

Meanwhile, India’s schools and undergraduates — where human capital is truly forged — remain underfunded, uneven in quality and riddled with gaps that perpetuate inequality.

The real question is not whether higher education matters. It absolutely does. The question is whether India has put its money in the wrong places — and whether a bold rebalance of priorities is overdue.

Following the money: Where the state spends

According to the Ministry of Education’s Analysis of Budgeted Expenditure on Education (2023), the state spends:

  • ~₹22,000 annually per primary student
  • ~₹44,000 per senior secondary student
  • ~₹2,00,000 per undergraduate
  • ~₹2,50,000 per postgraduate

This means that a single PG student consumes resources equivalent to over 10 primary students. The skew becomes sharper when we factor in elite institutions like IITs, IIMs and AIIMS, where subsidies are even higher.

On paper, this might be justifiable. Advanced degrees are expected to generate research, innovation and specialised skills. But does this investment actually deliver?

Outcomes: A sobering mismatch

1. Jobs that don’t need a master’s

Employers from corporate firms to the civil services consistently note that a bachelor’s degree is sufficient for most generalist roles, provided candidates possess relevant skills such as digital literacy, communication and problem-solving.

Lakhs of students pour into PG programmes not because they add value, but because they see no alternative in a saturated job market. The result is a glut of postgraduates with weak employability.

2. Research without impact

Where postgraduate systems should shine — knowledge creation — India underperforms. According to Scopus and Web of Science, India contributes only a modest share to global research output, despite its massive PG enrolment. Quality is an even bigger concern: predatory journals and recycled theses abound.

Fields that India urgently needs like social sciences to design inclusive policies or STEM research to drive innovation remain patchy, underfunded or detached from real-world challenges.

3. Underemployment, overqualification

The paradox manifests on the ground: taxi drivers with MAs, clerks with PhDs, young people trapped in cycles of coaching for the next exam. Degrees multiply, but opportunities don’t.

Why this imbalance persists

  1. Cultural prestige of higher education: In Indian society, a postgraduate degree is still seen as a badge of respectability. Families often push children toward PGs regardless of labour market demand.
  2. Policy inertia: Governments continue expanding PG seats, seeing it as a part of election manifesto while difficult investments like school teacher training lag.
  3. Weak undergrad quality: Since undergraduate programmes are patchy in quality, students see PGs as a way to “make up” for earlier deficits.
  4. Misaligned subsidies: Blanket funding, instead of targeted research grants, props up quantity over quality.

The opportunity cost: What schools could have done

Imagine redirecting even 20% of PG subsidies toward schools:

  • Modern classrooms in rural areas
  • Teacher training programmes
  • Anganwadis with electricity, water and play spaces
  • Foundational literacy and numeracy programmes for children under 10

Smile Foundation’s Mission Education initiative provides a glimpse of what this rebalancing looks like in practice. By investing at the school level — whether in tribal Kangra or flood-hit Assam — the foundation demonstrates that the real returns come when children get foundational learning, not when young adults are endlessly recycled through underperforming PG degrees.

Smile Foundation lens: Where the ground shifts

While the state debates postgraduate funding, organisations like Smile Foundation focus on the other end of the spectrum: early and foundational education, skilling and employability.

1. Mission Education

Operating in over 2,000 villages, the programme addresses foundational literacy and numeracy (FLN) ensuring that by age 10, children can read and do basic math. This directly tackles the learning poverty that leaves later graduates ill-prepared for higher education.

2. Shiksha Na Ruke

When the pandemic threatened to derail schooling, Smile stepped in with digital tools, teacher support and parental engagement. The idea was to prevent dropout at the earliest stages, so that children don’t stumble later.

3. Skilling and employability

Rather than waiting for postgraduate degrees to “fix” employability, Smile Foundation equips youth with practical, industry-linked skills — retail, healthcare, IT — ensuring they enter the job market with confidence.

This grassroots, practical approach contrasts sharply with the ivory-tower subsidies of the PG system.

Global lessons

1. China: Invest in undergrad + research, not mass PGs

China reformed its higher education by emphasising world-class undergrad programmes and targeted research funding. It avoided the trap of overproducing master’s students with little employability.

2. Finland: Schools first

Finland became a global education leader not by producing more PhDs but by investing in teachers, schools and equity at the foundational level.

3. Africa: Scholarship targeting

Several African nations are now targeting scholarships to critical research fields rather than funding mass PG enrolments.

Rethinking postgraduate education in India

If India must move beyond being “overfunded but underperforming,” three shifts are needed:

  1. Undergraduate excellence: Revamp curricula to integrate AI, digital skills and interdisciplinary thinking.
  2. Targeted PG funding: Restrict subsidies to research, teaching and specialised professions. Encourage cost-sharing elsewhere.
  3. Research ecosystems: Link funding to impact, originality and contribution to knowledge, not just enrolment.

And most importantly:
4. Rebalance toward schools: Grassroots investments yield exponential returns.

Narrative change: From degrees to dignity

The heart of the matter is narrative. For too long, Indian society has equated “more degrees” with “more respect.” But dignity and opportunity come not from paper credentials but from quality learning, employable skills and research that matters.

Smile Foundation’s work embodies this change. From children in remote tribal villages learning to dream, to youth in skilling programmes walking into jobs with pride, the focus shifts from chasing degrees to building capability and confidence.

A bold rebalancing

India stands at a demographic inflection point. If we continue to pour disproportionate resources into postgraduate expansion, we will produce more degrees than jobs, more research papers than real innovation and more frustration than opportunity.

But if we rebalance toward school education, toward quality undergraduates, toward targeted research, we can truly unlock our demographic dividend.

Categories
Women Empowerment

Why Women-Centric Business Models Look Different (And Should!) 

In the quiet lanes of Girgaum, Mumbai, in 1959, seven women with no formal education and barely any money came together on a rooftop with a simple yet powerful idea: to make papads. With just ₹80, they started this venture from a small kitchen. Operating in a socio-cultural context that largely relegated women to the domestic sphere, these women defied prevailing gender norms by founding what would later become one of India’s most iconic women-led cooperatives. Without access to formal financial support, professional training or external investment, the founders built a decentralised, home-based model that enabled women to generate income without leaving their households. They deliberately rejected hierarchical business structures, adopting instead a cooperative model in which every member was treated as an equal “sister,” sharing both labor and profits. This egalitarian ethos remains a foundational principle of ‘Lijjat Papad’ till date. 

By the 1990s, Lijjat had achieved national recognition and was operating in over 62 locations across India. As of 2023, the organization employs more than 45,000 women and reports an annual turnover exceeding ₹1,600 crore (approximately USD 190 million), all while maintaining a no-outsider ownership policy. More than a commercial success, Lijjat stands as a transformative model of gender-inclusive enterprise, demonstrating that when women are empowered to design economic systems around their lived realities, they do not merely participate in business—they redefine it. 

This case study, in fact, offers a valuable lens through which to examine the importance of women-centric business models and how they consistently challenge conventional approaches to enterprise. 

Defying conventional systems with women-centric businesses

For decades, the prevailing blueprint for business success has been a linear, high-growth, venture-capital-driven model. Silicon Valley’s ethos—move fast, scale faster, exit big—has shaped not only how startups are built but also who gets to build them. This emphasis often sidelines businesses that are rooted in community, sustainability and long-term resilience, thus, as more women, and especially women from marginalised communities, enter entrepreneurship, they signal a quiet revolution. Women-centric business models often look radically different. For starters, such organisations tend to be community-led, care-oriented and often circular by design. And in fact, women-led organisations ‘must’ look different. They are solving a different set of problems and often from a more inclusive, human-centered perspective. 

According to a 2025 study by research scholars at Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, published in the Journal of Marketing and Special Research, women entrepreneurs are emerging as powerful agents of change—economically and socially. Their involvement in business introduces new ways of thinking that often emphasise sustainability, inclusiveness and community welfare. Unlike conventional models, their approach tends to be more flexible and rooted in real-world social needs. Importantly, women-led enterprises do more than create jobs or generate revenue—they actively disrupt gender stereotypes and expand what leadership looks like. In doing so, they lay the groundwork for a more equitable entrepreneurial landscape, inspiring the next generation of women to lead on their own terms. 

Thus, it is no doubt that women entrepreneurs frequently prioritise stability over hypergrowth, collaboration over competition and long-term impact over short-term profit. This is so because they are building businesses that are not just scalable, but also sustainable. 

Advancing community, culture and care

In contrast to the top-down model of leadership celebrated in traditional startup culture, women entrepreneurs often adopt horizontal leadership structures that empower team members and encourage shared ownership. This care-oriented lens doesn’t just humanise business but it makes it more robust in the face of systemic challenges. This shows up in flexible work arrangements, trauma-informed leadership, ethical sourcing and cooperative ownership models. 

Let’s take the case of the garment and textile industry, where women make up an estimated 80 per cent of the global workforce, according to the International Labour Organization (ILO). This sector, particularly in Asia and the Pacific, holds immense transformative potential—not just economically, but socially—as it employs millions of women, often from marginalised backgrounds. The ILO notes that women’s leadership in this space is proving to be a catalyst for more sustainable business practices and alternative forms of governance. The report cites the example of Ka-Sha and its approach of producing custom-made products in small quantities. The business is profitable and contributes to environmental and social sustainability goals. In the process, Ka-Sha engages in enabling circular processes and focuses on community development efforts. 

While these approaches may not align with traditional investor metrics focused on rapid scale and profit, they offer powerful benefits: reduced waste, stronger local economies and a more equitable distribution of value. These examples underscore the need to recognise and support women-led innovations that prioritise sustainability and community well-being. 

Building inclusive, rooted entrepreneurship 

In rural India, many women with entrepreneurial spirit remain sidelined—not for lack of drive, but due to deep structural barriers: limited access to finance, low digital literacy, mobility constraints and social norms that confine them to the private sphere. Smile Foundation’s Swabhiman programme operates on the understanding that true empowerment is holistic. 

Swabhiman’s entrepreneurship training equips women—including adolescents—with business skills, financial literacy and hands-on mentoring. The holistic curriculum includes digital marketing, linkages to government schemes and confidence-building. In 2023–24, the programme:

  • Impacted over 190,000 women across six states
  • Helped create 68 women-led micro-enterprises

These businesses span food processing, tailoring, handicrafts, beauty services and more.

India can’t achieve inclusive prosperity without integrating rural women into the growth story. Swabhiman’s results show that small, smart investments—particularly in training, infrastructure and agency—can unlock massive social and economic dividends.

Categories
Health

Investing in ASHAs Is India’s Smartest Public Health Move

On a humid June morning in rural Bihar, 32-year-old Sunita Devi (name changed) cycles seven kilometres to reach the first home on her list. She’s the only Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) for five villages, tasked with everything from checking on expectant mothers to persuading families to vaccinate their children. By mid-morning, she’s rushing to an Anganwadi centre — a one-room space without electricity — to coordinate nutrition for toddlers. She does this six days a week. For her labour, she takes home a base honorarium of ₹2,000 a month from the central government, topped up by small, task-based incentives. There’s no paid leave, no retirement plan, no health insurance.

Yet without Sunita and millions like her, India’s public health and nutrition system — especially in rural areas — would collapse.

India’s first responders, without the recognition

India’s ASHA programme, launched in 2005 under the National Rural Health Mission, is the world’s largest volunteer health workforce. As of June 2022, more than 1.05 million ASHAs were serving across the country. In the remotest hamlets, they are often the first and only point of contact with the formal health system. Their roles span maternal care, facilitating institutional births, ensuring immunisation, promoting hygiene, distributing medicines and contraceptives, and sometimes handling emergencies with little more than determination and community trust.

But the work is relentless: 8–12 hours a day, often without protective gear, without job security and with pay that would barely cover a week’s groceries in a city. The model relies on a gendered and caste-based assumption — that care is “natural” for women, and therefore doesn’t deserve the wages or protections of “real” work.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed this contradiction. ASHAs became frontline warriors — delivering medicine, raising awareness, tracking cases, escorting patients to hospitals. Many contracted the virus; hundreds died. A few states paid token bonuses. For most, their status as “volunteers” meant no compensation to their families.

The Parallel Pillar of public health: Anganwadi workers

Alongside ASHAs are Anganwadi workers — the educators, caregivers and nutrition providers for millions of children under six and their mothers. India’s 13.9 lakh Anganwadi centres (AWCs) operate under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme, offering early childhood care, meals, health check-ups and preschool education.

But here too, systemic neglect is rife. According to Poshan Tracker data from June 2025, 10,868 AWCs across the country functioned for less than 20% of working days in that month — mostly in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur. That’s an improvement from June 2024, when nearly 30,000 centres failed to open regularly, but it’s still unacceptable for a service that underpins early childhood development.

The disparities are stark: Delhi, Goa and Chandigarh report almost full functionality, while large rural states struggle to keep doors open. The reasons range from inadequate infrastructure to chronic underfunding, to workers juggling multiple roles without support. In many villages, Anganwadi centres operate in borrowed spaces with no toilets, unsafe drinking water, no play materials and no storage for food.

The costs of public health neglect

The economic argument for investing in these frontline systems is unassailable. Neglecting them means higher maternal and infant mortality, greater malnutrition, more children starting school at a disadvantage and heavier long-term burdens on the healthcare system.

The social costs are just as severe. These centres are often the only spaces where rural women can gather, learn and exercise leadership. When they decay, so does the community’s sense of collective welfare. The undervaluation of ASHAs and Anganwadi workers is part of a broader, global pattern in which women’s unpaid or underpaid care labour props up entire economies — while remaining invisible in national accounts.

What needs fixing — Now

The fixes aren’t rocket science, but they require political will.

  1. Recognise their work as work
    ASHAs must be recognised as part of India’s formal health workforce, with salaries that reflect their essential role. Calling them “volunteers” while expecting them to deliver professional-level outcomes is unjust and unsustainable. Anganwadi workers should have structured pay scales, pensions and benefits.
  2. Upgrade infrastructure
    Every Anganwadi centre needs a permanent, safe building with electricity, clean water, functional toilets and space for learning and play. ASHAs need secure transport, basic equipment and facilities for their community health duties.
  3. Capacity building
    Ongoing training is critical — whether for using digital tools, counselling on nutrition, tracking child growth or managing emergencies. Better-trained workers produce better health outcomes and training has a proven multiplier effect on community resilience.
  4. Protective gear and safety protocols
    COVID-19 made clear the dangers of leaving frontline workers unprotected. Gloves, masks, sanitisers and first-aid kits should be non-negotiable basics.
  5. Mental health and grievance redressal
    These jobs are emotionally and physically taxing. Support systems, peer groups and accessible complaint mechanisms must be institutionalised.

Proof that targeted interventions work in public health

Smile Foundation offers a glimpse of what’s possible when investment meets intent. Working with corporate partners like PepsiCo and Mars Wrigley, we have strengthened Anganwadi capacity and supported ASHA networks in multiple states.

  • Punjab: The Nutrition Enhancement Programme improved maternal and child nutrition for over 60,000 people. Initiatives included kitchen gardens, 260 health camps and skills training for Anganwadi workers.
  • Maharashtra: Upgrades to 13 Anganwadi centres brought solar lighting, toilets, furniture and water filters — directly benefiting nearly 5,000 people.
  • Mathura, Uttar Pradesh: The Pink Smile initiative delivered anaemia screening and treatment to over 4,000 women and children via mobile medical units.

These projects are modest in budget compared to mega-infrastructure schemes, yet their impact is profound and immediate.

The global context

Globally, frontline community health workers are increasingly recognised as cost-effective public health investments. Studies in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America show that every dollar spent on community health yields multiple dollars in economic benefits through improved productivity, reduced disease burden and higher educational attainment.

India’s demographic and geographic scale means it stands to gain even more — but only if these roles are professionalised, funded and supported. Otherwise, the cycle of underinvestment and attrition will continue, weakening the country’s human development indicators.

A matter of justice

This is not just about efficiency. It’s about justice. India’s ASHAs and Anganwadi workers are overwhelmingly women from marginalised backgrounds. They navigate gender discrimination, caste hierarchies and bureaucratic indifference — yet remain the face of the state in millions of homes. They are the ones who knock on doors, carry vaccine coolers in the heat, comfort sick children and weigh newborns on hanging scales.

To continue exploiting their labour without recognition or protection is to betray the very principles of equity and dignity that the public health system claims to uphold.

The smartest investment India can make for public health

In the coming years, India will spend billions on new hospitals, AI health platforms and biomedical research. All of that will be undermined if the base of the pyramid remains fragile. Strengthening ASHA and Anganwadi capacities is the smartest, most cost-effective public health investment India can make. It builds healthier mothers, stronger children and more resilient communities.

The question is not whether we can afford to pay them fairly and equip them properly. The question is whether we can afford not to.

Categories
Smile

Building World-Class Sports Systems in India

In the blistering summer of 2023, the dusty sports field of a government school in Amethi, Uttar Pradesh, lay abandoned. The goalposts were bent. The basketball nets were torn. A solitary cricket bat, broken in half, rested under a neem tree. For 14-year-old Priyanshu, who dreams of becoming the next Neeraj Chopra, the message was clear. Dreams are cheap. Sports infrastructure is not.

Yet thousands of miles away, India’s Olympic ambitions were gathering pace. The country had set its sights on hosting the 2036 Summer Games. A lofty goal, no doubt. But it begged the question. Can a country with fragile grassroots infrastructure really transform into a global sporting powerhouse?

India has never lacked talent. What it has often lacked is an ecosystem that supports it. According to a 2022 KPMG report, the country has fewer than one certified coach for every hundred athletes. Around 65 percent of schools still do not have any formal sports facilities. Despite this, young athletes across India continue to train, compete and dream. But more often than not, they do so in isolation.

There is no shortage of inspiration. From Abhinav Bindra and P V Sindhu to Mary Kom and Neeraj Chopra, India has produced champions who have risen against the odds. Yet their success stories are rare. Exceptions that prove the rule.

Benefits of building a robust sports infrastructure 

Well-planned sports infrastructure is not just about medals. It levels the playing field. It ensures that a child in rural Odisha gets the same chance as one in urban Bengaluru. It makes talent visible. It makes coaching effective. It makes sports safer. More inclusive. And when it works well, it becomes invisible. The track that doesn’t crack under monsoon rains. The physio who keeps injuries at bay. The coach who spots promise where others see only potential.

India is beginning to invest in this invisible scaffolding. The Khelo India Scheme has been one such effort. Since 2018, the programme has supported over 3,000 athletes across 23 disciplines. It has helped set up more than 240 state-level academies. It is a start. But it is not yet a system.

Governments cannot do this alone. Across the world, public-private partnerships have helped unlock new models of sports infrastructure. Australia’s AIS model. The US college sports system. Even China’s state-supported academies have been bolstered by industry. In India, corporate initiatives have played a key role. The JSW Group, Reliance Foundation and Tata Trusts have supported academies, sponsored talent and built elite facilities.

The Inspire Institute of Sport in Bellary is an example. Backed by JSW, it has already begun to produce Olympians. Athletes train here under world-class coaches with access to sports science, nutrition and rehab. This is not a pipe dream. It exists. But it needs to scale.

Brands have also entered the field. PUMA India, in partnership with Smile Foundation, supports over 1,600 low-resource schools across 15 states. Our Education Quality Improvement Project (EQuIP) treats sport as core to education, not an extracurricular luxury.

At Smile Foundation’s Mission Education Centre in Bengaluru, children access structured physical activity alongside schooling. For many, it is the first time they are given proper space, nutrition and guidance to play. According to Santanu Mishra, co-founder of Smile Foundation, these environments do more than build athletes. They build confidence.

But even as some centres thrive, many others stagnate. A 2024 audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General found that over 60 percent of state-funded sports facilities remain underutilised. Poor maintenance. Lack of trained staff. Bureaucratic delays. The usual culprits.

New infrastructure must avoid the mistakes of the past. India has a chance to think greener and build smarter. The Sardar Patel Sports Complex in Ahmedabad has become a case in point. Solar powered. Designed with pedestrians in mind. Equipped with waste recycling systems. The National Games Village in Gujarat has taken similar steps, from rooftop panels to rainwater harvesting. These are early signs that sustainability is entering the sports conversation.

Yet these are still exceptions. The real loss is not just monetary. It is human. When 16-year-old Kavita trains barefoot in rural Bihar. When a para-athlete in Chhattisgarh cannot access a basic gym. These are not rare stories. They are systemic symptoms.

Sustainable school infrastructure growth and international support 

Without basic access, dreams wither. Sports can lift people out of poverty. Out of stigma. It can create new pathways for mobility, especially for those historically excluded. In Brazil, football academies have long served as pipelines for youth from low-resource settings. In China, Olympic scouting begins as early as primary school. India does not need to copy these models. But it does need to commit to its own.

In July 2025, the Indian government unveiled the National Sports Policy. It lays out a roadmap for building world-class facilities, improving governance and developing elite athletes. It also reaffirms India’s intention to bid for the 2036 Olympics. But is the bid a catalyst or a distraction?

Critics worry that mega events often lead to white elephants. Stadiums that gleam briefly then decay. Resources diverted from school grounds to vanity projects. Tokyo 2020 offers a counter example. More than half its venues were temporary or repurposed. Its post-Games strategy focused on grassroots initiatives.

India could learn from that. The Olympics can be a goal. But they cannot be the only one. If the Games become a reason to fix what is broken, they will have served a purpose. If not, they risk becoming yet another monument to missed opportunities.

Sports education in schools

Education must be part of the solution. Countries like Kenya and China have long understood that the classroom and playing field must go hand in hand. Yet in India, many students still complete twelve years of school without structured access to sports.

Smile Foundation is working to change that. Through EQuIP, they are embedding physical activity into everyday schooling. They are not just creating athletes. They are fostering healthier, more confident children. In a country grappling with rising obesity and youth mental health concerns, this work has never been more urgent.

India has always known how to dream big. From lunar landings to biometric systems to hosting the G20. But sports is different. It cannot be fast-tracked. It demands consistency. Humility. And long-term thinking.

If the country is serious about 2036, the real work starts now. In the fields of Amethi. In the corridors of Bellary. In the classrooms of Bengaluru. That is where India’s Olympic future will be decided. Not in the glitz of an opening ceremony, but in the quiet, everyday infrastructure that makes champions possible.

Categories
Education

Does Play Teaching Need a Rethink?

In a government-run classroom on the outskirts of Pune, a sixth-grader sits hunched over a battered tablet, eyes locked on a simulation game. Her task is to run a virtual pizza shop, an example of play teaching. She sets prices, adjusts for discounts, tallies ingredient costs and races to meet fictional customer orders. At first, it seems like just another screen-based distraction. But beneath the pixelated surface, the child is unwittingly practicing fractions, testing algebraic logic and learning to juggle decision-making under pressure. The math isn’t in a textbook — it’s alive, immediate and, most crucially, fun.

Across the room, another group of students is building a bridge out of popsicle sticks and rubber bands. They argue over whether triangles are stronger than squares, put both designs to the test and cheer when one bridge holds a row of tiny toy trucks. They’re not just playing. They’re intuiting basic physics, understanding structural engineering through trial and error and learning to collaborate. All without a single worksheet.

You would think that this is creative pedagogy but it’s a glimpse of what classrooms could be if we took play seriously.

Play teaching beyond the preschool years

In India’s crowded policy discourse on education, “play” often features as a footnote — relevant to Anganwadi centres and pre-school classrooms, but quickly deemed dispensable as children age. Formal schooling takes over. Blackboards replace blocks. Assessments outweigh curiosity.

Yet, as a growing body of global research shows, this sharp division between play and “real learning” might be doing more harm than good.

More than a century ago, Friedrich Froebel, the German educator who created the concept of kindergarten, called play the “highest expression of human development in childhood.” He saw it not as a leisure activity, but as a serious form of exploration — children making sense of their world through action.

Modern neuroscience, developmental psychology and pedagogy echo his intuition. Play teaching stimulates the brain’s executive functions — the same faculties responsible for problem-solving, planning and emotional regulation. Children who engage in regular structured play often display better communication skills, stronger social awareness and deeper academic engagement.

The vanishing act

So why does play vanish from Indian classrooms once children can read, write and count?

One explanation is structural: teachers are under immense pressure to complete rigid curricula, often within overcrowded classrooms and with scarce resources. A Year Six science teacher might want to introduce hands-on experiments or role-play, but is more likely to spend the lesson drilling students on definitions for an upcoming exam.

Another is perceptual: many parents and educators still see play teaching as frivolous or inefficient. A child building a LEGO robot or navigating a puzzle game might be learning algorithmic thinking but from the corridor, it just looks like playtime.

This divide is reinforced by teacher training itself. Most B.Ed. programmes in India dedicate scant attention to the pedagogical role of play, especially beyond early childhood. Even those who recognise its value often lack practical strategies to embed it meaningfully in subject teaching.

In short, there’s a widespread failure to recognise that play doesn’t have to be the opposite of serious study — it can be the vehicle for it.

Learning to play, playing to learn

In Finland, primary school children spend more than an hour a day in unstructured play. In Singapore, one of the world’s highest-performing education systems, playful inquiry is being integrated into upper primary classrooms. In the UK, schools like School 21 are combining performance, storytelling and game-based modules to teach maths and science.

India, too, has its champions. In several low-income schools supported by social enterprises, play-based math modules are being used to teach geometry and measurement. Storytelling apps are being piloted to boost language comprehension. In Delhi and Maharashtra, coding games are making their way into ICT labs, often with higher girl participation than traditional classes.

Ed-tech platforms like BYJU’s and Cuemath, and grassroots efforts like those of Pratham or Agastya Foundation, are increasingly using games and simulations as core teaching tools. From physics sandboxes to logic-based challenges, these digital resources show that play isn’t just an early childhood strategy — it’s an educational equaliser.

Still, scale remains a challenge. Too often, these innovations are confined to urban private schools or small pockets of NGO intervention.

Rethinking the system: A blueprint for schools

If Indian education is to truly embrace play teaching as pedagogy, it must go beyond individual classrooms and touch the system’s core. This means policy, curriculum, assessments — and culture.

1. Curriculum Flexibility
Schools need room to reimagine how subjects are taught. That means integrating time for structured, purposeful play — not just during breaks, but within subjects. A history lesson can involve simulations. Science can be taught through design challenges. A math module can culminate in a marketplace game. NEP 2020 calls for experiential learning — play offers one path to deliver that.

2. Rethinking Assessment
Exams often kill innovation. Educators need tools to evaluate outcomes from playful learning like collaboration, creativity or concept application. Formative assessments, project-based evaluations and digital portfolios could offer viable alternatives.

3. Professional Development
Training teachers in how to structure and scaffold play is key. This involves hands-on workshops, mentorship and exposure to successful models, especially in under-resourced schools. Most teachers want to innovate — they just need the tools and trust.

4. Parent and Community Awareness
Changing mindsets is crucial. School leaders must engage parents, showing them how play supports 21st-century skills. Governments and CSR initiatives can launch awareness campaigns highlighting success stories and data-backed outcomes.

A missed opportunity or a missed mindset?

The urgency to act is not abstract. According to a McKinsey report, nearly 69 million new jobs will be created globally by 2027, many requiring critical thinking, creativity and collaboration — skills rarely tested in board exams. If India’s children are to thrive in this future, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds, the education system must equip them with more than rote knowledge.

Play, in this context, isn’t a distraction but a delivery mechanism. It’s how abstract concepts become real, how soft skills are built, and how learners gain the confidence to experiment and fail.

This is particularly vital for girls, children with learning difficulties and those in first-generation learner families. Structured play can be the bridge between exclusion and empowerment, between confusion and confidence.

Beyond buzzwords: Investing in play

In policy papers, “play” is easy to endorse. But meaningful change requires budget lines, teacher support and cultural shifts. Encouragingly, the NEP does acknowledge play-based learning in foundational years. But the vision needs to extend — and translate — to primary and middle school levels.

Governments can offer incentive grants for schools integrating play. Ed-tech companies can develop low-cost offline tools tailored to rural classrooms. CSR arms of corporations can fund playgrounds, labs, and training. NGOs and school networks can document and scale local innovations.

The payoff will be more than just happy children. It will be sharper thinkers, more resilient learners and classrooms that prepare for life, not just exams.

Play it forward

Education reform often gets bogged down in abstractions — competency frameworks, benchmarking rubrics, skill taxonomies. Amid all this, play can seem too simple, too soft, too messy.

But the truth is: play is serious work. It builds the architecture of learning. It cultivates the habits of mind that help children adapt to a changing world.

In India, where millions of children still drop out before Class 10, where classroom engagement remains a perennial struggle, and where exam anxiety eats away at curiosity — play might just be the most radical reform of all.

It’s time to stop asking whether play has a place in serious education and start recognising that it always did.

Categories
Smile Gender

Social Protection for Women in Rural India

In a rapidly advancing economy, one critical question demands attention: where do rural Indian women stand today? With nearly 48% of women still residing in rural areas, their progress remains central to the nation’s broader development. As technology and financial reforms reshape India’s economic landscape, the concern persists — are rural women advancing alongside the rest of the country, or are they being left behind?

India has made notable jump through legal reforms, government schemes, corporate collaborations and grassroots NGO efforts that aim to empower women. These initiatives have contributed to safer, more supportive environments for rural women. However, substantial challenges remain. Many rural areas continue to lack the infrastructure, resources and opportunities necessary for inclusive and equitable growth. Among the most urgent concerns are persistent health vulnerabilities and financial exclusion, both of which hinder the full participation of rural women in India’s development journey.

Her Health Vulnerabilities

Women in rural India face ongoing health challenges, especially in maternal and reproductive care. Limited access to quality healthcare, preventive screenings and proper nutrition compounds their vulnerability. In Jharkhand, for instance, the Food, Nutrition, Health and WASH programme mobilised 3.2 million women through self-help groups (SHGs) to promote hygiene and health underscoring the scale of unmet need.

The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) reports that over 57% of rural women aged 15–49 are anaemic, revealing a serious public health burden. Maternal mortality remains a critical issue, with India recording a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 97 per 100,000 live births (2018–2020), disproportionately affecting rural regions. At the same time, the rise of non-communicable diseases such as hypertension and diabetes poses growing risks to the long-term well-being of women.

Without adequate protection mechanisms, women often delay seeking care due to cost, distance or lack of awareness. This leads to preventable health shocks and higher maternal mortality, further weakening household resilience and relegating women’s health needs to secondary status.

Her Financial Vulnerabilities

Despite the growth of entrepreneurship initiatives targeting rural women, financial exclusion continues to undermine their economic agency. According to a 2023 NITI Aayog report, just 14% of Indian women are engaged in entrepreneurial activity, with even fewer represented in the formal sector. Structural barriers persist, including:

  • Limited access to institutional credit
  • Inadequate digital infrastructure
  • Absence of gender-responsive support systems
  • Social norms that limit decision-making and ownership

While women now hold 42.2% of rural bank accounts, they still face difficulties accessing credit, savings products and digital financial tools. Encouragingly, the number of women borrowers has tripled since 2019, with 60% from rural and semi-urban areas. (From Borrowers to Builders: Women’s Role in India’s Financial Growth Story)

Systemic barriers hindering her overall growth

Beyond financial and health-related challenges, rural women face systemic barriers at the institutional and community levels, where adequate support is often lacking.

Cumbersome, bureaucratic loan processes laden with documentation and procedural delays discourage many from pursuing opportunities.
The absence of structured mentorship and peer support leaves aspiring entrepreneurs without networks to scale and sustain their businesses.
Gender bias and entrenched stereotypes within financial institutions and community settings continue to question women’s credibility and leadership potential.

Overcoming these barriers is essential to realising the full potential of rural women. The way forward must involve making social protection accessible to every woman, particularly those in India’s most remote and underserved regions.

Understanding social protection for women of rural communities

To meaningfully include rural women under the social protection umbrella, we must begin with a clear definition. The International Labour Organisation defines social protection as the provision of social security in response to life risks such as unemployment, disability and maternity as well as support for those experiencing poverty or social exclusion.

This definition reveals that poverty and exclusion disproportionately impact women in rural areas. Globally, over two billion women and girls lack access to any form of social protection. In India, this gap is equally concerning. Even where social protection mechanisms are in place, gender disparities persist. According to UN data, only 50.1% of women access at least one social protection benefit compared to 54.6% of men. Rural women face the highest levels of exclusion.

These figures highlight the urgency of developing a robust, gender-responsive social protection framework — one that not only extends coverage but also propels rural women forward in their journey toward empowerment and economic inclusion.

Government initiatives supporting rural women

To advance women’s empowerment across rural India, the government has implemented several strategic programmes. Some of the most impactful include:

  1. National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM)
    NRLM strengthens women’s self-help groups, expands credit access and promotes entrepreneurship building sustainable livelihoods and community resilience.
  2. MGNREGA
    With one-third of its jobs reserved for women, MGNREGA ensures fair wages, income security and economic independence.
  3. e-NAM and Cooperatives (NCDC)
    By facilitating market linkages and collective bargaining, women gain access to fair pricing and new opportunities in agriculture, dairy and textiles.
  4. Mission Poshan 2.0 and PMMVY
    These initiatives promote maternal nutrition and provide direct cash transfers, addressing critical vulnerabilities during pregnancy and early motherhood.
  5. Swachh Bharat, Ujjwala, and Jal Jeevan Missions
    Access to sanitation, clean water, and LPG connections improves health outcomes, reduces domestic drudgery and frees up time for education and employment.
  6. Digital Literacy and Mission Shakti
    Through digital training and safety initiatives, these programmes enhance women’s access to information, services and institutional support.

Swabhiman – A grassroots pillar of social protection

While government policies set the groundwork, the true test of social protection lies in last-mile delivery ensuring access to health, nutrition and financial tools at the doorstep. Smile Foundation’s Swabhiman programme plays a vital role in bridging this delivery gap, offering targeted support to rural women across multiple dimensions of empowerment.

In FY 2024, Swabhiman reached over 190,000 women across six states, equipping them with access to healthcare, financial literacy and entrepreneurial skills. The programme recognises that sustainable workforce participation is intricately tied to health, dignity and opportunity.

Partnering for women’s empowerment and social protection

Rural women in India are resilient and ready to lead. Yet their advancement depends on equitable systems — ones that guarantee access to health services, financial resources and sustained opportunities.

Smile Foundation’s Swabhiman initiative provides a credible platform for corporates and civil society to partner with government efforts. By integrating healthcare, vocational training and financial and digital literacy, Swabhiman helps build long-term, community-rooted pathways for empowerment.

Together, we can ensure that social protection reaches the last mile and that every woman, no matter where she lives, has the opportunity to thrive. Drop us a mail for a CSR partnership related to women empowerment.

Categories
CSR Partners In Change Partnerships Smile

The 7 Core Dimensions of CSR in India

“Business has a responsibility beyond its basic responsibility to its shareholders; a responsibility to a broader constituency that includes its key stakeholders: customers, employees, NGOs, government – the people of the communities in which it operates.”

Courtney Pratt, Former CEO Toronto Hydro.

Corporate Social Responsibility in India has shifted from being viewed as an obligation to becoming a strategic enabler of sustainable growth. With Section 135 of the Companies Act making CSR mandatory, corporates now leverage purpose-driven NGO partnerships to achieve measurable outcomes. These collaborations embed ethics, innovation and accountability, fostering resilient communities and driving long-term societal transformation. In crux, one can understand the world of CSR through the Caroll’s pyramid of CSR which defines responsibility across four layers- economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic.

CSR and Indian businesses

India’s business landscape experienced a transformation since 1990s. Industries expanded globally, driving impressive growth in sales and market share. Yet, alongside this progress came the realisation that unchecked expansion risked resource overuse and environmental strain. At the same time, as the bond between businesses and consumers deepened, it became clear that this relationship must also extend to supporting the communities that sustain them, thereby contributing to the holistic development of the nation.

  1. Importance of CSR in India
  • Globalisation
    Global trade and integrated supply chains have heightened expectations around fair labour practices, environmental stewardship and community welfare. Forward-looking companies now embrace CSR partnerships not only to comply with emerging regulations but also to build resilience, enhance market access and secure long-term growth.
  • International guidelines
    Global frameworks such as the UN Global Compact and SA8000 encourage corporates to align with universally accepted principles on human rights, the environment and anti-corruption. While advisory, these standards have significantly influenced CSR in India, motivating corporates to collaborate through CSR NGO partnerships that deliver practical, scalable solutions to social challenges.
  • Corporates as brands
    Corporates are no longer isolated economic actors but vital pillars of society. By embedding strategic CSR partnerships into their core, businesses in India are moving beyond traditional philanthropy to drive purposeful, lasting change. This alignment of profitability with social impact not only strengthens corporate reputation but also builds enduring trust with stakeholders.
  1. Strategic alignment with business goals 

As per Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 companies are supposed to allocate 2% of average net profits towards social development. But, if one looks closely, the responsibility is not just monetarily, but in aligning CSR activities with broader business strategies. 

Corporates through CSR partnerships establish a long term investment in sustainability. When companies integrate CSR laws into their core business models, they achieve a dual purpose of contributing to national development while also enforcing their own competitiveness. 

For example, when a healthcare company invests in rural healthcare initiatives under CSR, they not only fulfils compliance but also builds trust within the communities, expands market reach and promotes a healthier customer base. 

CSR is perceived as shared value creation, where profitability and social well being move hand in hand. It strengthens 

  • Brand reputation 
  • Improves stakeholder trust
  • Enhances risk management 

Thereby, proving that structured CSR partnerships with NGOs enable effective last mile delivery and measurable impact.

Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility in India (Source: PwC)

  1. Community-centric approach 

One of the most critical shifts in Corporate Social Responsibility practice in India has been the movement from top-down philanthropy to co-created community led models of development.  According to the Journal of Business Perspective, 2022 research has shown that CSR initiatives designed with active community participation achieve greater relevance, sustainability and long term acceptance. 

By involving local stakeholders in identifying challenges and shaping solutions, companies design interventions rooted in real needs and cultural contexts, making them more effective and sustainable. This participatory approach then fosters trust, ownership and stewardship, enabling communities to continue initiatives beyond the funding cycles.

On the other hand, NGOs in India play a vital role in bridging the gaps between the grassroot communities and corporates; by translating corporate intent into grassroots action through network and credibility. Thus showcasing that corporates, NGOs and communities can create purpose-driven partnerships that deliver inclusive scalability and ensure social change across India.

  1. Sustainability & environmental responsibility – Focus areas

ESG driven CSR demonstrates that companies integrating environmental, social and governance priorities enhance long term value creation rather than compromise it. Governance strengthens accountability, environmental projects deliver sustainability and the social dimension delivers the most immediate impact on the marginalised communities of India. By investing in the following focus areas, corporates can optimise their CSR goals with long term sustainability. 

  • Education and skill development
    Education unlocks human potential and transforms communities. Initiatives that combine quality learning with vocational training equip children and youth to rise above poverty, secure dignified employment and contribute to society’s progress.
  • Healthcare and sanitation
    Accessible healthcare and sanitation protect both dignity and life. Mobile health units, preventive care and hygiene awareness bring critical services closer to underserved communities, ensuring healthier families and resilient futures.
  • Livelihood enhancement
    Sustainable livelihoods empower individuals with independence and dignity. Skill-building programmes and entrepreneurship opportunities create pathways out of poverty, enabling families to thrive and communities to achieve long-term social and economic stability.
  • Environmental sustainability
    Safeguarding the environment is central to future prosperity. Community-led conservation, water stewardship and sustainable practices inspire people to live in balance with nature, protecting resources for generations to come.
  • Women’s health and empowerment
    When women thrive, communities prosper. Focused interventions in nutrition, healthcare, education and skills give women the tools to lead healthier lives, access opportunities and uplift families and entire communities.
  1. Scalability and innovation

Smart CSR enabled by data and technology drives transparency and measurable outcomes. This systemic approach enables corporates to scale solutions, replicate success and address root causes of social challenges. By aligning innovation with impact, CSR in India is now evolving towards a future ready ecosystem delivering sustainable and verifiable results. 

For example, tech-enabled CSR solutions are transforming impact delivery with AI enhancing education and healthcare while digital financial inclusion fosters equitable and sustainable growth

  1. Impact measurement and transparency

Impact measurement in CSR is evolving through technology with AI enabling precise data collection, real time monitoring and transparent reporting. For business and communities, this integration ensures accountability, drives efficiency and scales sustainable solutions making technology-driven impact assessment integral to purpose led growth in India’s CSR landscape

  1. Emerging trends in CSR and CSR partnerships

Corporate Social Responsibility in India has matured from philanthropy into a strategic tool for community transformation. To remain effective, corporates must align with emerging CSR trends that shape long-term impact:

  • Shift to strategic CSR partnerships – Moving beyond transactional funding towards long-term, systemic collaborations, strengthened by ESG–CSR convergence and transparent sustainability disclosures.
  • Digital CSR – Leveraging e-learning, telehealth and digital skilling to expand reach and inclusion.
  • Geographic expansion – Extending CSR initiatives into Tier 2/3 cities and rural communities for deeper social development.
  • Thematic priorities – Health, women’s empowerment, STEM education, scholarships for girls and skill development as focus areas.
  • Employee volunteering – Embedding purpose and ownership within corporate culture, amplifying community impact.

Enabling strategic CSR impact with Smile

Anchored in its Lifecycle Model, Smile Foundation drives holistic development through 400+ CSR partnerships in education, healthcare, women’s empowerment and livelihoods. With over 2 million beneficiaries nationwide, initiatives like Mission Education, Swabhiman, STeP and Health Cannot Wait deliver measurable impact, fostering sustainable growth, empowerment and systemic community transformation across India.

Few of our Key partnerships 

  • Education (STEM & Learning Enhancement)
    Partner:
    Abbott India Limited
    Under the Mission Education programme, Abbott supports STEM education in eight additional schools, benefiting approximately 2,200 students through improved learning environments and digital classrooms. 
  • Education and Digital Inclusion
    Partner:
    WSP
    Collaborated to educate 400 children across Bangalore and Noida via blended learning formats under Mission Education, expanding access to quality education.
  • Scholarships for Girls in Engineering
    Partner: Quantiphi
    Launched an Engineering Scholarship Project for Girls, empowering 22 meritorious, underserved students in computer science and engineering through tuition support and employability training.
  • Skill Development and Livelihoods
    Partner:
    Macleods Pharmaceuticals
    Supported the establishment of two STeP vocational training centres in Mumbai, boosting employability for 280 underprivileged youth, especially in retail and soft skills. 
  • Healthcare and Sanitation
    Partner:
    GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Asia Pvt Ltd
    Through the Smile on Wheels mobile medical units, this CSR collaboration delivers free dental check-ups and oral-health awareness to underserved communities nationwide.

In conclusion, the seven core dimensions of CSR in India must be central when defining future CSR goals. By engaging in credible CSR–NGO partnerships, businesses can demonstrate how responsibility evolves into systemic, long-term community transformation. Strategic collaboration ensures scalability, transparency and measurable results.

Equally important is embracing emerging CSR trends to remain future-ready. By partnering with purpose-driven NGOs such as Smile Foundation, corporates can transcend compliance, creating meaningful impact that drives sustainable growth, strengthens communities and enhances corporate reputation.

Partner to achieve purpose-led progress. Click here: https://www.smilefoundationindia.org/corporate-partnership/

0%