Categories
In The Spotlight Insights Smile

Your Birthday Is the Best Reason to Give Back: The Power of a Birthday Donation

Summary

A birthday is one of the few moments in a year that belongs entirely to you. But across the world, more and more people are choosing to mark that day not just by receiving, but by giving. Birthday donations and birthday fundraisers have become one of the most personal and powerful ways to support causes that matter. From children running classroom fundraisers to global celebrities redirecting their celebrations toward communities in need, the idea is simple: your special day can create change far beyond your own life. This blog explores why birthday giving matters, how it works, who is doing it and how you can start — including through Smile Foundation’s birthday donation programme.

The Birthday Paradox: A Day of Receiving That Can Change Lives

There is something uniquely human about birthdays. Across cultures, religions and geographies, the anniversary of someone’s arrival in the world is marked with warmth, cake, candles, songs and gifts. It is a day that says: you matter and we are glad you are here.

But birthdays also carry a tension. As we grow older, many of us begin to feel that the accumulation of things — gifts we may not need, parties that leave little memory — does not quite capture what the day should mean. The older the birthday, often, the stronger the pull toward something more purposeful.

This is where the idea of a birthday donation enters and it enters naturally. Because if a birthday is about gratitude for your own life, then directing some of that gratitude outward, toward someone who has far less, is perhaps the most honest way to celebrate.

What Is a Birthday Donation or Birthday Fundraiser?

A birthday donation is simply the act of donating to a cause on or around your birthday, either personally or by inviting others to contribute in lieu of gifts. A birthday fundraiser takes this a step further — it involves creating a dedicated fundraising campaign where friends, family and colleagues can pool their contributions toward a specific cause or organisation.

Both are straightforward in practice. The impact, however, is anything but small.

When you ask twenty people to donate even a modest amount in your honour, you have transformed a birthday into a collective act of generosity. You have turned well-wishers into contributors. And you have made your celebration mean something to people who were never at the party.

Why Birthdays Are the Perfect Moment for Giving

Psychologists have long noted that birthdays trigger a specific kind of emotional reflection. They mark the passage of time in a way that ordinary days do not. They invite us to ask: what have I done? What do I value? Who am I becoming?

These are precisely the conditions in which generosity flourishes.

There is also a social dimension. Birthdays are moments of heightened connection — people reach out, check in, wish you well. A birthday fundraiser rides that wave of goodwill. When you invite people to give to a cause as part of your celebration, you are not asking a cold audience. You are asking people who are already thinking about you warmly. The response rate and the emotional resonance, tends to be far higher than a standard donation appeal.

And there is the question of legacy. What do you want your birthday to represent? A dinner that will be forgotten by next week or a contribution to a child’s education that may shape the course of their life?

How Prominent People Around the World Do It

The idea of giving on your birthday is not new, and some of the world’s most recognised figures have shown how powerfully it can be done.

Leonardo DiCaprio turned his 39th birthday celebration into a major fundraising event for his environmental charity, the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, generating significant donations for conservation causes.

On his 60th birthday, musician Sting held a special charity concert at New York City’s Beacon Theatre, joined by performers including Lady Gaga, Bruce Springsteen and Stevie Wonder. The proceeds went to the Robin Hood Foundation, an organisation working to address poverty.

Actress Mindy Kaling marked her 40th birthday by donating to charitable causes, reflecting publicly on her gratitude and her awareness of inequality — particularly for children who share her heritage but not her advantages.

Zendaya celebrated her 20th birthday by raising $50,000 from friends and admirers for Convoy of Hope, an organisation supporting impoverished women across Kenya, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Tanzania and the Philippines.

South African actress Lillian Dube celebrated her 70th birthday by launching the Celebrities for Good Causes Foundation and asking guests for an entrance fee in the form of four pairs of school shoes. Her foundation went on to donate 70,000 pairs of school shoes to children across all nine provinces of South Africa.

Closer to home, when Rajinikanth turned 65 in December 2015, he requested his fans not to celebrate his birthday and instead urged them to donate to relief efforts for families affected by the devastating Chennai floods.

Each of these examples shares a common thread: the birthday became a platform, not for personal celebration alone, but for collective action.

Children Who Give Back on Their Birthdays

Perhaps the most moving dimension of birthday giving is when it comes from children themselves — young people who choose, often unprompted, to redirect their birthday moment toward others.

Around the world, children are running birthday fundraisers for causes they care about: animal shelters, clean water campaigns, school supplies for peers in underserved communities. Many do this through social media platforms, raising awareness and funds simultaneously.

In India, this culture is quietly growing. Children in urban schools are increasingly organising birthday collections for classmates in need, or channelling their celebrations toward NGOs working in education and child health. Teachers and parents who encourage this are not just raising funds, they are raising children who understand that empathy is not passive.

At Smile Foundation, this spirit of giving is something we see reflected in the families and communities we work with. When a child chooses to give on their birthday, they are not simply donating. They are learning, perhaps for the first time, that their life has the power to improve someone else’s.

The Psychology of Giving: Why It Feels Good

There is a growing body of research that confirms what many people already sense intuitively: giving makes us happier. Studies in positive psychology have consistently shown that spending money on others produces a greater boost to well-being than spending it on ourselves.

Birthdays amplify this effect. When giving is tied to a personal milestone, a day already freighted with meaning and emotion, the act carries more weight. It feels intentional rather than automatic. It becomes part of how we define the year and ourselves.

There is also the ripple effect. A birthday fundraiser is visible. Friends and family who contribute often share the campaign. They tell others why they gave. The cause gains exposure it would never have found through a conventional appeal. And sometimes, a simple birthday post inspires someone who has been looking for exactly this kind of cause to give to.

Birthday Donations in India: A Growing Culture

India has a long tradition of giving during moments of personal significance at weddings, religious occasions and family milestones. The birthday donation is a natural extension of this impulse, adapted for a generation that wants to act on its values in visible, connected ways.

Social media has accelerated the trend significantly. Facebook’s birthday fundraiser feature alone has enabled people to raise substantial sums simply by adding a donation link to their birthday post. Instagram stories, WhatsApp forwards and personal crowdfunding pages have made it easier than ever to turn a birthday into a giving moment.

What is changing is not just the mechanics but also the mindset. Increasingly, people in India, across age groups and income levels, are asking whether their celebrations can carry more meaning. Whether the money spent on a party, a dinner or a gift might go further if directed toward a child who needs a school uniform, a family that needs healthcare access or a young woman who needs vocational training.

How Smile Foundation Makes Birthday Donation Easy

Smile Foundation invites people to celebrate their birthdays meaningfully by donating online, with contributions going directly toward supporting underprivileged children across India.

Smile Foundation directly benefits over 15 lakh children and their families every year through more than 400 welfare projects in education, healthcare, livelihood and women’s empowerment, spanning over 2,000 remote villages and urban slums across 25 states of India.

When you make a birthday donation to Smile Foundation, your contribution can support a child’s education through Mission Education, provide healthcare access through mobile medical units, support a young woman’s vocational training or fund community health interventions in underserved areas.

Smile Foundation ensures that birthday gifts are effectively utilised to bring positive change in the lives of underserved children and contributions are eligible for up to 50% tax benefit under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act.

You can also set up a birthday fundraiser in your name, sharing the link with friends and family and inviting them to contribute in lieu of gifts. It is a straightforward process and every contribution, however small, moves the needle.

How to Set Up Your Birthday Donation/Fundraiser: A Simple Guide

Starting a birthday fundraiser does not require technical expertise or a large following. It requires only the decision to try.

Begin by choosing a cause that feels personal to you — education, healthcare, women’s empowerment, child nutrition. Then visit Smile Foundation’s website and explore the donation page dedicated to birthday giving. Set a fundraising goal that feels achievable but meaningful and write a short, honest note about why this cause matters to you. Share it with your network over WhatsApp, Instagram, email or wherever your people are and let the momentum build.

Do not wait for the day itself. Send the link a week before your birthday, giving people time to contribute. Thank each donor personally. And at the end of it, take a moment to reflect on what you have built — not a party that will be forgotten, but a contribution that will last.

A Different Kind of Birthday Memory

There is a particular kind of memory that stays with us longer than most. It is not the memory of what we received, but of what we did — the moments when we acted in alignment with our values, when we chose something larger than ourselves.

A birthday donation creates that kind of memory. It is the year you raised enough to put a child through a term of school. The year your friends came together not just for you, but for someone they had never met. The year your birthday became something more than a day.

That is the power of birthday giving. It does not diminish the celebration but deepens it.

If this resonates with you, visit Smile Foundation’s birthday donation page and take the first step. Your birthday is coming. So is the opportunity to make it count.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is a birthday donation?

A birthday donation is the act of donating to a cause on or around your birthday, either personally or by creating a fundraiser and inviting friends and family to contribute in lieu of gifts. It is a way of marking a personal milestone with a gesture that extends beyond yourself.

What is a birthday fundraiser and how is it different from a direct donation?

A direct donation is a personal contribution you make on your birthday. A birthday fundraiser involves creating a dedicated campaign, often shared via social media or messaging apps, where your network can collectively contribute to a cause in your honour. Fundraisers tend to amplify the impact significantly, as they mobilise multiple contributors around a single goal.

How do I set up a birthday fundraiser with Smile Foundation?

You can visit Smile Foundation’s birthday donation page, choose a cause you care about and make a donation or set up a personalised fundraising link to share with your network. The process is simple, secure and takes only a few minutes.

Is my birthday donation to Smile Foundation tax-deductible?

Yes. Donations to Smile Foundation are eligible for up to 50% tax benefit under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, making birthday giving financially sensible as well as personally meaningful.

What causes can my birthday donation support at Smile Foundation?

Your contribution can go toward child education through the Mission Education programme, healthcare access through mobile medical units, women’s empowerment and vocational training, nutrition support or community development initiatives across India.

Is there a minimum amount required for a birthday donation?

No. Every contribution, regardless of size, makes a meaningful difference. A small donation from one person, multiplied across a birthday fundraiser’s network of contributors, can add up to something substantial.

Can children run birthday fundraisers too?

Absolutely, and many do. A child who chooses to fundraise on their birthday is developing empathy, social awareness and the understanding that their actions have consequences beyond their immediate world. It is one of the most valuable lessons a birthday can teach.

Why are birthdays a particularly good time to fundraise?

Birthdays create a natural moment of connection — people are already thinking about you warmly and are inclined to engage. A birthday fundraiser channels that goodwill into collective action, making it one of the most effective and emotionally resonant moments to ask for support.

Will Smile Foundation keep me updated on how my donation is used?

Yes. Smile Foundation provides regular updates through newsletters, impact stories and progress reports, so donors can see the real-world difference their contributions have made.

Can I donate in someone else’s name as a birthday gift?

Yes. Making a donation in someone’s name on their birthday is a deeply thoughtful gift — one that honours both the recipient and a cause they may care about. Smile Foundation welcomes this kind of giving.

Categories
Girl Child In The Spotlight Smile

The Missile Woman of India: Tessy Thomas

Summary

Known as the Missile Woman of India, Tessy Thomas has redefined what leadership in science and defence looks like in modern India. From a modest upbringing in Kerala to leading some of India’s most advanced missile programmes, her journey is one of resilience, intellect and determination. Best known for her work on the Agni missile series, including contributions to long-range systems like Agni-IV and beyond, she has played a critical role in strengthening India’s strategic capabilities. Her story is about breaking barriers, inspiring generations and proving that science, when pursued with conviction, can transform both a nation and its narrative.

Missile Woman of India in her childhood
Missile Woman of India in her childhood watching a rocket launch.

Determination of Steel

There is a photograph that captures something essential about Tessy Thomas, admiringly called the Missile Woman of India. She is standing in a control room, composed and focused, surrounded by the kind of instrumentation that most people will never see in their lifetimes. There is no drama in her expression — only the quiet authority of someone who has spent decades earning her place in one of the most demanding fields in the world.

That composure, it turns out, has been there from the beginning.

A Childhood Shaped by the Coast and Circumstance

Tessy Thomas was born in April 1963 in Alappuzha, a town of backwaters and fishing boats on the Kerala coast. It was not, by any obvious measure, a place that pointed toward missile science. But the distance between where someone begins and where they end up is rarely about geography.

When her father suffered a stroke during her childhood, the family’s stability shifted overnight. Financial pressure arrived early, and so did the understanding that resilience was not optional. Her mother held the household together and kept education at the centre of it — a decision that would shape everything that followed.

What Alappuzha did offer, almost by accident, was proximity to the Thumba Equatorial Rocket Launching Station. Growing up within sight of rocket launches, Tessy Thomas absorbed something that no curriculum could fully deliver: the visceral sense that science was not abstract. It was loud and bright, and real. She thought that she could reach the moon.

The Decision That Wasn’t Obvious

Choosing aerospace engineering in the India of the early 1980s required a particular kind of conviction, especially for a woman. Defence research was not a field that actively recruited women, and there were few visible role models to suggest it was even possible.

What drew her in was the national mood around science itself. India was building something — in space, in defence, in its own sense of technological self-sufficiency. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam and others were turning missile development into a kind of national aspiration, and for a young woman who found mathematics and physics more instinct than effort, the pull was difficult to resist.

She completed her engineering in electronics and communication, then specialised in guided missile technology. The decision was unconventional. In retrospect, it looks inevitable.

Tessy Thomas stepped into a field long considered a male preserve.

Building a Career in the Shadows of Classified Work

Tessy Thomas joined the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) in the 1980s, at a time when India was investing heavily in indigenous defence capability. The work was unglamorous in the way that most serious scientific work is — iterative, precise and largely invisible to the public.

She was not fast-tracked. She climbed. Each role brought greater complexity: guidance systems, trajectory optimisation, mission planning, systems integration. Her focus was the Agni series of ballistic missiles, and within that programme, her contributions to long-range systems — including becoming the Project Director of the Agni-IV ballistic missile and the development pathways toward future variants, would eventually earn her a title that no one had held before. The media called her India’s Missile Woman and Agniputri.

A group photo of the team of AGNI-IV missile including DRDO Chief Shri Avinash Chander and the Project Director, AGNI-IV, Ms. Tessy Thomas, at the launch of AGNI-IV, the 4000 Kms range Nuclear Capable Ballistic Missile from the Wheeler Island off the coast of Odisha on January 20, 2014.

Over time, she rose to Director General of Aeronautical Systems at DRDO, one of the most senior positions in India’s defence research structure. Those who worked with her describe a leadership style that was calm under pressure, technically unimpeachable and unusually collaborative for a domain that often rewards hierarchy over openness.

As of April 2026, Dr. Tessy Thomas serves as the Vice-Chancellor of Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education (NICHE) in Kanyakumar

What the Title “Missile Woman of India” Actually Means

The label Missile Woman of India entered public consciousness as a media shorthand, but it points to something more specific than celebrity. It reflects the fact that for a sustained period, across some of India’s most strategically sensitive defence projects, one person’s technical judgment was indispensable.

Her work on guidance and control systems determined whether a missile could reach its target with precision. Her contributions to systems integration meant that complex, multi-component technologies could function as a coherent whole. These are not supporting roles but the work itself.

India’s ability to develop and deploy long-range ballistic missiles without dependence on foreign technology owes something significant to her. That is what the title is actually marking.

Born with a science-curious mind, Tessy contributed significantly in the ballistic missile projects of DRDO.

Kalam, Mentorship and the Philosophy Behind the Science

Working alongside A. P. J. Abdul Kalam left a particular kind of impression on Tessy Thomas — not just technical, but philosophical. Kalam believed that science was inseparable from the people who practised it, and that the culture of a laboratory was as important as the quality of its instruments. That thinking shaped how she approached her own leadership.

She has spoken consistently about the importance of teamwork in environments where individual brilliance is often over-celebrated. She has championed young scientists and women in STEM particularly, not through grand gestures but through the more durable work of being present, accessible and honest about the path.

The human side of her career including the mentorship, the institutional culture-building and the insistence that science is a collective endeavour, may ultimately prove as significant as any single technical achievement.

Recognition and What Comes After

In 2025, Tessy Thomas received the Eighth Paulos Mar Gregorios Award, presented at the Thyagaraj Sports Complex. The award, established in memory of Paulos Mar Gregorios — theologian, scholar and former President of the World Council of Churches — recognises contributions that carry meaning beyond professional accomplishment. It was a fitting recognition for a career that has always been about more than the work itself.

Her tenure as Vice-Chancellor of Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education extended her influence into the next generation of engineers and scientists, translating decades of experience into institutional knowledge that could outlast any single project.

Why STEM Access Matters Today

The journey of the Missile Woman of India is not an isolated story of individual brilliance. It is also a reminder of what becomes possible when girls are given access to education, mentorship and opportunity in science and technology.

Across India, however, millions of girls are still excluded from STEM pathways — not due to lack of ability, but due to lack of access.

This is where organisations like Smile Foundation are working to bridge the gap.

School girls from one of our STEM initiative learning new things.

Through our focused interventions in education, Smile Foundation is enabling children, especially girls from underserved communities, to access STEM learning through digital classrooms, experiential education and mentorship. By introducing young learners to science, technology, engineering and mathematics early on, these programmes aim to build academic competence, curiosity and confidence.

Because the next Tessy Thomas may not be missing talent but opportunity.

The next breakthrough in science might not come from privilege.

It might come from potential, if we choose to invest in it.

Tessy Thomas is a vessel of inspiration for many young girls.

A Legacy Still Being Written

Behind the precision and discipline of missile development lies a life carefully balanced between professional intensity and personal responsibility. Tessy Thomas built her career alongside a family life anchored in a shared understanding of service — her husband, Saroj Kumar, being associated with the Indian Navy and their son growing up in an environment shaped by both science and duty. She has often spoken about long nights at testing sites, the pressure of mission timelines and the constant negotiation between motherhood and leadership. Her journey reflects not just individual achievement, but the everyday balancing act that many women in demanding careers continue to navigate.

The story of Tessy Thomas resists the tidiness of a conventional achievement narrative. It is a career built on technical excellence, navigated against the grain of convention, sustained by genuine purpose.

In a country still working to close the gap between aspiration and access for women in science and leadership, her journey functions as both proof and provocation. Proof that the barriers are not insurmountable. Provocation to ask why they exist at all.

The Missile Woman of India grew up watching rockets launch from a coastal town in Kerala. She spent her life making sure they would land exactly where they were meant to.

FAQs

Why is Tessy Thomas called the Missile Woman of India?

The title reflects her decades of contribution to India’s ballistic missile programmes, particularly the Agni series and her leadership role in developing indigenous missile technology at DRDO.

Where was Tessy Thomas born?

She was born in April 1963 in Alappuzha, Kerala.

What inspired her to pursue aerospace engineering?

A combination of early exposure to rocket launches near Thumba, a natural aptitude for mathematics and physics, and the scientific ambition of the era embodied by figures like A. P. J. Abdul Kalam drew her toward the field.

What are her most significant contributions to India’s defence sector?

Her work on guidance and control systems, mission planning, trajectory optimisation and systems integration for long-range ballistic missiles has been central to India’s indigenous defence capability.

What awards has she received recently?

She received the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Award (2012), DRDO Scientist of the Year (2008), Agni Award for Excellence in Self-Reliance (2001), ETPrime Women Leadership Awards (2023): Woman Pioneer of the Year, Dr. Thomas Cangan Leadership Award (2018), Sir Mokshagundam Visvesvaraya Award (2016), CNN-IBN Indian of the Year (2012), Smt. Chandaben Mohanbhai Patel Industrial Research Award (2009), India Today Women of the Year (2009), DRDO Performance Excellence Award (2011, 2012) for her contributions to Agni-IV and Agni-V, Outstanding Woman Achiever Award by WISE and Dr. Paulos Mar Gregorios Award (2025).

What leadership roles has she held?

She has served as Director General of Aeronautical Systems at DRDO and is currently the Vice-Chancellor of Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education.

Categories
CSR In The Spotlight Insights

What is CSR in India? Full Form, Law, Activities & NGO Implementation Guide (2026)

Key Takeaways

  • CSR in India is mandatory with eligible companies required to spend 2% of profits on social development
  • The mandate was introduced to bridge gaps in sectors like health, education and livelihoods where public systems fall short
  • CSR has evolved from charity to strategy, moving towards structured, outcome-driven interventions
  • Schedule VII offers flexibility, allowing companies to align CSR with national and local development priorities
  • Proposed reforms aim to ease compliance, while retaining accountability and impact focus
  • NGOs play a critical role, providing last-mile access, contextual understanding and execution capability
  • Partnership models are key, combining corporate scale with grassroots expertise
  • Impact and accountability are increasingly central, with growing emphasis on measurable outcomes
  • Hybrid approaches are emerging, reflecting a shift towards scalable, sustainable CSR models

What is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India? Meaning and Importance

Before going into the meaning of the word, let’s understand as to why CSR came into existence.

Companies were making huge benefits and it was deepening the divide between the rich and the poor of India. By mandating CSR for eligible companies, their economic resources and management expertise could be utilised for the welfare of the nation.

So, CSR is a business spending mandate of the government wherein companies mobilize substantial funds for critical sectors that traditional government schemes alone are not able to fully cover.

The critical sectors are:

  • Education & Skills: Vocational training, building schools and career counseling.
  • Healthcare: Sanitation, primary healthcare, maternal and child health, reproductive health, malnutrition eradication.
  • Environment: Water conservation, agriculture, renewable energy and afforestation.
  • Social Equality: Empowering women, minorities and senior citizens

CSR Law in India under the Companies Act, 2013

Under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, eligible for-profit companies must spend at least 2% of their average net profits from the preceding three years on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities. Mandatory for companies with a net worth of ₹500 crore+, turnover of ₹1,000 crore+ or net profit of ₹5 crore+, this law requires a CSR Committee to oversee projects aligned with Schedule VII. 

In CSR activities, preference needs to be given to local areas where companies operate. This is to ensure that the communities whose lives are most affected by the commercial activities of the companies reap the maximum benefits out of the CSR mandate.

The mandate amount, if not spent, would mean enquiries and a report from the company’s board to the government explaining the reasons for the non-spend. The amount doesn’t remain with the company, it must be either transferred to a special account within 30 days of the financial year-end or to a fund specified in Schedule VII within six months. 

Failure to comply can lead to severe consequences with a penalty of ₹1 crore or twice the amount required to be transferred to the CSR fund, whichever is less.

CSR Eligibility Criteria for Companies

As of March 2026, the government has proposed a series of amendments to the Companies Act and LLP laws to promote ease of doing business and reduce compliance burdens. These include changes to CSR norms, decriminalisation of procedural defaults, greater flexibility in share buybacks and relaxations for small firms. 

As part of these reforms, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has specifically proposed changes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) provisions. One key proposal is to increase the net profit threshold for CSR applicability to ₹10 crore, thereby potentially reducing the number of companies required to undertake CSR. Additionally, the time allowed for transferring unspent CSR funds to a designated account is proposed to be extended from 30 days to 90 days, providing companies greater flexibility in compliance.

The amendments also include revisions to the eligibility criteria for the constitution of CSR committees. Currently, companies meeting thresholds of ₹500 crore net worth, ₹1,000 crore turnover or ₹5 crore net profit are required to spend at least 2% of their average net profits on CSR activities.

Overall, these proposed changes signal a shift towards simplifying compliance requirements while maintaining the CSR framework, with an emphasis on flexibility and ease of implementation for companies.

List of CSR Activities as per Schedule VII

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India is guided by Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013, which outlines a broad and flexible set of activities that companies can undertake to contribute to social development. Rather than prescribing rigid categories, the framework allows organisations to align their CSR initiatives with both national priorities and local community needs.

At its core, Schedule VII places strong emphasis on human development and basic needs. This includes efforts to (i) eradicate hunger, poverty and malnutrition, alongside improving access to healthcare, sanitation and safe drinking water. These areas remain critical in addressing structural inequalities and improving quality of life, particularly in underserved regions.

(ii) Education is another central pillar. The framework encourages companies to support formal and informal learning, including special education, vocational training and livelihood enhancement programmes. By focusing on employability and skills, CSR initiatives in this area contribute directly to economic participation and long-term development.

Schedule VII also highlights the importance of (iii) gender equality and social inclusion. Initiatives that empower women, create safe spaces such as hostels and day-care centres, and reduce inequalities faced by marginalised communities are recognised as key CSR activities. This reflects a broader understanding that development must be inclusive to be sustainable.

(iv) Environmental sustainability forms a significant part of the CSR mandate. Companies are encouraged to invest in projects that promote ecological balance, conserve natural resources and improve environmental quality. This includes activities such as afforestation, biodiversity conservation and sustainable resource management, aligning corporate action with global climate and sustainability goals.

In addition, the framework recognises the importance of preserving (v) cultural heritage and national identity. CSR efforts can support the protection and restoration of historically significant sites, as well as promote traditional arts and handicrafts, thereby sustaining cultural ecosystems and livelihoods.

(vi) Support for armed forces veterans and their families, as well as the (vii) promotion of sports — particularly at the grassroots and national levels — are also included within the scope of CSR. These areas contribute to both social welfare and national development.

Schedule VII further enables companies to contribute to government-led initiatives by allowing (viii) donations to specified funds such as the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund and PM CARES Fund. It also encourages support for (ix) research and innovation through contributions to technology incubators and projects in science and engineering.

Finally, the framework places emphasis on (x) rural and slum area development, as well as (xi) disaster management, including relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts. These areas ensure that CSR remains responsive to both long-term development challenges and immediate humanitarian needs.

Overall, Schedule VII provides a comprehensive yet adaptable structure for CSR in India. By covering a wide spectrum of social, economic and environmental priorities, it enables companies to design interventions that are not only compliant, but also meaningful and impactful.

Real CSR Examples by Companies in India

The roots of CSR in India began in the mid-19th century (1850s), driven by philanthropy and religious traditions. While not labeled as “CSR” at the time, pioneers like the Tatas, Birlas and Godrej families established the first major social initiatives by funding schools, hospitals and temples indicating that social good need not require mandates. These early efforts were based on personal values rather than legal mandates, focusing on community development and relief during famines or epidemics. 

Historical Evolution of CSR in India

The idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in India did not emerge overnight. It has evolved gradually, shaped by cultural values, economic shifts and changing expectations from businesses. Broadly, this journey can be understood across four distinct phases.

Phase 1 (1850–1914): Charity and Philanthropy
Industrial families such as the Tatas, Birlas, Godrejs, Shrirams and Bajajs played a pioneering role, often funding temples, schools and hospitals. These efforts were driven less by formal strategy and more by a sense of moral responsibility and community welfare.

Phase 2 (1914–1960): Social Development
As India moved through the freedom struggle and into independence, the role of businesses began to shift. CSR became more aligned with national priorities, influenced by Gandhian ideals of trusteeship. Companies increasingly supported social development initiatives, particularly in rural areas and worked alongside the state in nation-building efforts.

Phase 3 (1960–1990): Institutionalisation through Corporate Trusts
During this period, CSR became more structured. Many companies established dedicated trusts and foundations to manage their social initiatives. While the approach was still largely philanthropic, there was greater organisation and continuity in how these activities were planned and implemented.

Phase 4 (1991–2013): Liberalisation and Strategic CSR
Economic liberalisation marked a turning point. As businesses expanded and globalised, CSR began to take on a more strategic role. Partnerships with NGOs, increased stakeholder expectations and the rise of public-private collaborations led companies to think beyond charity and towards long-term impact.

Modern CSR Recognition

While philanthropic giving has existed for centuries, the formal recognition of CSR in India matured with the release of the DPE Guidelines in 2010 for public sector enterprises and the subsequent mandate for disclosures. FICCI also played a major role by establishing the first CSR Awards in 1999 to recognize corporate contributions.

How Companies Implement CSR Projects with NGOs

Companies partner with NGOs based on alignment, transparency, accountability and sustainability. For example, a company finding climate solutions will pair up with development organizations who have the in-depth knowledge of disaster-prone areas and invest their funds in helping the affected communities grow more resilient to climate changes.

NGOs that have historically worked with communities for an ample amount of time provide companies with the strategic direction, an exhaustive list of community needs and priorities, on-ground implementation measures and long-term sustainability models to ensure impact lasts beyond the project period.

Why NGOs Play a Critical Role in CSR Implementation

Even as many companies today establish their own foundations to implement CSR programmes, the role of NGOs remains central to driving meaningful impact on the ground. Corporate foundations often bring scale, resources and strategic alignment with business goals. However, translating intent into lasting community change requires a depth of local understanding that NGOs are uniquely positioned to offer.

NGOs act as the bridge between the company intent and the community transformation. They provide the grassroots expertise, local presence, contextual knowledge and implementation capability — all factors that are difficult to build quickly and — are necessary to translate corporate funds into measurable, long-term impact. They understand local socio-cultural dynamics, identify real needs beyond surface-level indicators and design interventions that are both relevant and sustainable. 

Importantly, NGOs approach CSR through a social development lens rather than a compliance lens. This allows them to design programmes that address root causes — whether in education, healthcare or livelihoods — rather than just symptoms. Their focus on outcomes and community ownership ensures that interventions continue to create value even after project cycles end.

For companies with their own foundations, partnering with NGOs is not a limitation but a strategic advantage. It enables them to combine institutional capacity with grassroots insight, ultimately leading to more credible, scalable and impactful CSR outcomes.

Benefits of Partnering with an NGO for CSR

  • Strong last-mile reach
    India has over 3 million NGOs, many working in remote and underserved areas, enabling companies to reach communities beyond their direct operational footprint.
  • Grassroots expertise
    NGOs bring deep understanding of local contexts, ensuring CSR programmes are relevant, culturally appropriate and community-driven.
  • Better implementation outcomes
    Evidence from development programmes shows that initiatives with community participation and local adaptation have higher success and sustainability.
  • Regulatory compliance made easier
    Established NGOs are already registered under MCA (CSR-1) and have systems for reporting, audits and documentation, reducing compliance burden for companies.
  • Measurable impact and accountability
    NGOs use tools like baseline surveys, monitoring frameworks and third-party evaluations, aligning with the growing requirement for impact assessment in CSR.
  • Cost and time efficiency
    Partnering avoids the need to build large in-house CSR teams, allowing companies to leverage existing infrastructure and expertise.
  • Faster programme rollout
    NGOs’ on-ground presence enables quicker implementation compared to setting up new operations from scratch.
  • Focus on long-term change
    NGOs typically design programmes that address root causes, ensuring sustainability beyond short-term CSR cycles.
  • Enhanced credibility and trust
    Working with credible NGOs strengthens stakeholder confidence, including communities, regulators and investors.
  • Strategic collaboration advantage
    Combines corporate scale and funding with NGO insight and execution, leading to more effective and scalable CSR models.

How Smile Foundation Implements CSR Projects Across India

One of the distinguishing aspects of our work in CSR implementation is its hybrid model, which combines Social Venture Philanthropy (SVP) with direct programme execution. This approach allows the organisation to balance scale, quality and long-term sustainability across diverse geographies.

At the core of this model is Social Venture Philanthropy (SVP) — an approach inspired by venture capital principles. Under SVP, Smile Foundation partners with credible community-based organisations (CBOs) to implement development projects. However, the engagement goes far beyond funding. We actively invest in capacity building, training and institutional strengthening, enabling these grassroots partners to deliver programmes effectively and sustainably. By nurturing leadership, improving governance practices and embedding accountability mechanisms, SVP ensures that smaller organisations are equipped to scale their impact over time.

Complementing this is our Outreach model, where programmes are implemented directly by the organisation. This approach is particularly relevant in remote or underserved regions, where the complexity of challenges or lack of local capacity requires more intensive, hands-on intervention. By working closely with local communities and stakeholders, Smile Foundation ensures that these programmes are not only professionally managed but also contextually relevant and outcome-driven.

What strengthens this dual approach is a strong emphasis on credibility and accountability. Smile Foundation follows a four-tier audit and evaluation mechanism, ensuring transparency in fund utilisation and rigorous assessment of programme impact. This structured oversight builds trust among corporate partners while ensuring that CSR investments translate into measurable social returns.

Together, the SVP and Outreach models reflect a pragmatic understanding of India’s development landscape — where some contexts require collaboration and capacity building, while others demand direct intervention. This flexibility allows Smile Foundation to deliver CSR partnerships that are both scalable and deeply rooted in community needs.

FAQs — CSR in India

1. What is CSR in India and why is it important?
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India refers to the legal obligation of certain companies to contribute to social and environmental development. Introduced under the Companies Act, 2013, CSR ensures that businesses go beyond profit-making to play an active role in addressing issues such as education, healthcare, inequality and sustainability. It positions companies as key stakeholders in national development.

2. Which companies are required to comply with CSR provisions?
Companies are required to undertake CSR if they meet any one of the following criteria in the preceding financial year: a net worth of ₹500 crore or more, a turnover of ₹1,000 crore or more, or a net profit of ₹5 crore or more. This threshold ensures that larger, financially capable companies contribute to social impact.

3. How is the CSR spending amount calculated?
Eligible companies must spend at least 2% of their average net profits from the last three financial years on CSR activities. The calculation excludes certain types of income, such as profits from overseas branches, ensuring that CSR spending reflects domestic business performance.

4. What kind of activities are considered valid CSR under Indian law?
CSR activities must fall under the categories listed in Schedule VII of the Companies Act. These include promoting education, improving healthcare and sanitation, supporting gender equality, ensuring environmental sustainability, rural development, disaster relief and more. The framework is broad, allowing companies to design programmes aligned with both national priorities and local needs.

5. How can companies implement their CSR initiatives?
Companies have multiple implementation options. They can run programmes directly, set up their own foundations, or partner with registered NGOs and implementing agencies. In practice, many companies adopt a hybrid approach, combining in-house strategy with NGO-led execution to ensure both scale and effectiveness.

6. Why are NGOs considered important partners in CSR?
NGOs bring deep grassroots knowledge, community trust and implementation expertise. They understand local challenges, can adapt programmes in real time and ensure sustained engagement with beneficiaries. This makes CSR initiatives more relevant, inclusive and impactful, especially in underserved or remote regions.

7. What happens if a company does not spend its CSR budget?
If CSR funds remain unspent, companies are required to transfer the amount to a specified fund or a designated CSR account within a defined timeframe. For ongoing projects, the funds must be utilised within a stipulated period; otherwise, they must be redirected as per regulatory guidelines. This ensures accountability and prevents funds from remaining idle.

8. Is CSR in India voluntary or mandatory?
CSR is mandatory for companies that meet the eligibility criteria, making India one of the first countries to legally require corporate social investment. However, while spending is mandated, companies have flexibility in choosing the areas and methods of implementation.

9. What is the role of impact assessment in CSR?
Impact assessment has become increasingly important, especially for large CSR projects. Companies are expected to evaluate whether their interventions are creating measurable and sustainable outcomes. This includes tracking indicators such as improvements in education, health or livelihoods, moving CSR from a spending exercise to an outcome-driven approach.

10. How is CSR evolving in India today?
CSR in India is gradually shifting from a compliance-driven activity to a more strategic and integrated function. Companies are focusing on long-term programmes, aligning CSR with business values, and building partnerships with NGOs and institutions. There is also greater emphasis on transparency, data-driven decision-making and sustainable development goals.

Categories
Education

The Future of India’s Young Talent

Walk into any classroom, coaching centre or college campus in India and you will find no shortage of ambition. Students are studying longer hours than ever, enrolling in multiple courses, learning coding, communication skills, data analytics, often all at once. By most conventional measures, India’s young talent is more prepared, more exposed and more driven than previous generations.

And yet, a quiet contradiction persists.

Employers speak of skill gaps. Graduates speak of joblessness. Startups complain about a shortage of problem-solvers, even as millions of young people compete for a shrinking pool of secure jobs. Somewhere between education and employment, something isn’t quite working.

It is tempting to locate the problem in the individual: that students are not curious enough, that they are too focused on marks, too risk-averse, too conditioned to follow instructions. But this diagnosis, while convenient, is incomplete. It shifts responsibility onto young people without interrogating the system that shapes their choices.

The more uncomfortable question is this: what if India’s young talent is not lacking in curiosity, but is being trained to suppress it?

The discipline of survival

To understand how this happens, it is necessary to begin with the conditions in which most young Indians make decisions.

For a large share of households, education is not an abstract pursuit of knowledge. It is an economic strategy. A degree is expected to translate into a job; a job into stability; stability into upward mobility. The margin for error is thin. Failure is not romanticised as experimentation; it is experienced as loss.

In such an environment, curiosity becomes a calculated risk.

Students quickly learn to optimise for what is rewarded. If examinations determine access to opportunity, then examinations become the focus. If memorisation yields marks, memorisation becomes a rational strategy. If deviating from the syllabus risks underperformance, then deviation is avoided.

This is not a failure of thinking. It is a form of thinking adapted to constraints.

When we say that India’s young talent lacks critical thinking, what we often mean is that the system has made critical thinking costly. It asks students to choose between curiosity and certainty, and then evaluates them on certainty.

The architecture of conformity

The structure of Indian education reinforces this pattern.

From early schooling to competitive exams, the emphasis is on arriving at the correct answer quickly and consistently. There is little institutional space for ambiguity, debate or open-ended inquiry. Questions are framed with expected answers in mind. Success depends on reproducing those answers with precision.

Even at higher levels, where the expectation might be different, the habit persists. Students trained for years to prioritise correctness over exploration do not suddenly become experimental thinkers when they enter college or the workplace.

This creates a paradox. Employers seek individuals who can solve problems, adapt to new situations and think independently. But the pipeline that produces these individuals has largely rewarded the opposite: compliance, speed and accuracy.

The result is not a lack of ability, but a mismatch between training and expectation.

Curiosity without pathways for India’s young talent

It would be misleading to suggest that curiosity is absent among India’s young talent. It exists, often in informal and unrecognised ways.

One sees it in the improvisational solutions people create in resource-constrained settings. One sees it in the rapid adoption of new technologies, in the explosion of online learning, in the willingness of young people to teach themselves skills outside formal curricula.

But curiosity, on its own, does not transform economies. It requires pathways.

High-income countries did not become innovation-driven simply because their students were more curious. They built ecosystems that could absorb and scale that curiosity: research institutions, industry linkages, funding mechanisms and regulatory environments that allowed experimentation.

In India, these pathways remain uneven.

A student may have an idea, but lack access to mentorship. A prototype may exist, but struggle to find funding. A research question may be worth pursuing, but not align with immediate job prospects. In each case, curiosity encounters friction.

Without systems that convert ideas into outcomes, curiosity remains latent.

The weight of expectations on India’s young talent

There is also a social dimension that shapes how India’s young talent engages with learning.

Families, understandably, prioritise stability. Certain career paths — engineering, medicine, government service — are seen as reliable routes to security. Alternative paths, even when promising, are often viewed with caution.

This does not eliminate curiosity, but it channels it.

A student interested in design may pursue engineering first and defer that interest. Someone inclined towards research may choose a corporate role due to financial pressures. Over time, these decisions accumulate, narrowing the space for exploration.

It is easy to interpret this as a lack of ambition or imagination. In reality, it reflects the negotiation between aspiration and obligation.

When thinking is not enough

Even when individuals do develop strong critical thinking skills, another barrier emerges: the labour market’s capacity to absorb them.

Innovation-driven roles — those that require problem-solving, creativity and original thinking — are still a relatively small segment of the overall job market. A large proportion of employment remains in sectors that value routine, efficiency and execution.

This creates a second mismatch.

On one hand, there is increasing emphasis on developing higher-order skills. On the other, there are limited opportunities to deploy those skills at scale. The outcome is predictable: either underutilisation or migration, both internal and external.

In this context, asking whether students are curious enough misses a more structural issue: are there enough spaces where curiosity is economically viable?

Rethinking the narrative

The tendency to critique young people for lacking curiosity is not unique to India. It appears in many societies undergoing economic transition. But it is particularly misleading in a country where structural constraints are so pronounced.

A more useful framing would shift the focus from individuals to systems.

Instead of asking:
Why aren’t students more curious?

We might ask:
Where does curiosity get rewarded, and where does it get penalised?
What kinds of thinking does our education system incentivise?
How easily can ideas move from classrooms to markets?

These questions do not absolve individuals of responsibility. Rather, they recognise that behaviour is shaped by context.

What would it take to change course for India’s young talent?

If India’s young talent is to become a driver of high-income growth, the shift required is not merely attitudinal. It is structural.

First, assessment systems need recalibration. As long as success is defined narrowly through standardised testing, learning will remain aligned with that definition. Introducing more application-based evaluation, project work and open-ended problem-solving can begin to change incentives.

Second, bridges between education and industry must deepen. Internships, apprenticeships and collaborative research can expose students to real-world problems earlier, making learning more contextual and less abstract.

Third, risk needs to become more tolerable. This is not only a cultural shift but also a policy one. Access to funding, safety nets for entrepreneurs and support for early-stage experimentation can reduce the cost of failure.

Fourth, mentorship and exposure must expand beyond urban centres. The gap between what is possible and what is visible remains significant in many parts of the country. Expanding access to networks and guidance can unlock latent potential.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we need to change how we talk about success. When success is defined narrowly, choices narrow with it. Broadening that definition can create space for different kinds of achievement, including those driven by curiosity and innovation.

A different starting point

There is a tendency in policy and public discourse to begin with deficits. To identify what is lacking, what needs fixing, what must be corrected.

But in the case of India’s young talent, the starting point might need to be different.

The issue is not that young people are unwilling to think, question, or explore. It is that they are navigating systems that often make such behaviour inefficient, risky, or unrewarded.

This distinction matters.

Because if the problem is misdiagnosed, the solutions will be too.

When India’s young talent travels

One way to test whether the issue lies with individuals or systems is to observe what happens when context changes.

Across sectors and geographies, India’s young talent has demonstrated an ability to not only participate, but lead, when given the right conditions. From boardrooms in Silicon Valley to research labs in Europe, Indians have occupied some of the most influential positions in the global economy.

Consider Sundar Pichai at Google, Satya Nadella at Microsoft and Arvind Krishna at IBM — leaders who have steered some of the world’s most complex technology companies through periods of rapid change.

Equally, women of Indian origin have shaped global institutions in significant ways. Indra Nooyi transformed PepsiCo with a long-term strategic vision that balanced performance with purpose. Leena Nair now leads Chanel, bringing a people-centric leadership approach to one of the world’s most recognisable luxury brands. Gita Gopinath has been central to shaping global macroeconomic policy at the International Monetary Fund.

In science and technology, the pattern repeats. Kalpana Chawla and Sunita Williams became symbols of aspiration not just because of where they came from, but because of what they were able to do in environments that supported advanced research, experimentation and exploration.

This is not an argument about migration as success, nor is it a suggestion that opportunity does not exist within India. Rather, it is a reminder of something more fundamental: capability travels well, but it also responds to context.

When individuals trained in one system consistently excel in another, it raises a difficult but necessary question. If the same person can think, lead and innovate at the highest levels elsewhere, what is different about the conditions they encounter there?

The answer is rarely about inherent ability. It is about ecosystems that convert ability into impact — systems that provide access to capital, mentorship, research infrastructure and, importantly, the freedom to question and experiment without immediate penalty.

Smile Foundation and India’s young talent

Amid these structural challenges, organisations like Smile Foundation are working to reimagine how India’s young talent engages with learning. Through our programmes Mission Education and Tayyari Kal Ki we reach children and adolescents in underserved communities with a focus that goes beyond rote learning. Classrooms are designed to integrate digital tools, experiential activities and life skills, encouraging students to ask questions, solve problems and build confidence in their own abilities.

Importantly, by working closely with communities, parents and local institutions, Smile Foundation creates an ecosystem where curiosity is not seen as a risk but as a pathway — especially for young people who are often the first in their families to access formal education. In doing so, it demonstrates that when the right support systems are in place, India’s young talent can move from compliance-driven learning to capability-driven growth.

Conclusion

No country becomes high-income without cultivating and harnessing curiosity. But curiosity does not emerge in isolation, nor does it flourish in environments that constrain it.

India’s challenge, then, is not to produce more curious individuals. It is to build systems that recognise, nurture and reward the curiosity that already exists.

Until that happens, the conversation about whether students are thinking enough will continue to miss the point.

The question is not whether India’s young people can think differently.
It is whether the system will allow them to.

FAQs

1. Does India’s young talent lack critical thinking skills?
Not inherently. Many young people adapt to an exam-driven system that rewards memorisation. The issue lies more in how systems shape learning behaviour than in a lack of ability.

2. Why do many students focus more on jobs than learning?
For many families, education is closely tied to economic security. This makes stable employment a priority, often limiting the space for exploration and risk-taking.

3. How does the education system impact curiosity?
When assessments prioritise correct answers over inquiry, students optimise for performance rather than understanding. Over time, this can suppress questioning and experimentation.

4. If Indian youth are capable, why do many succeed more abroad?
Global ecosystems often provide stronger support through research infrastructure, mentorship, funding and tolerance for failure, allowing talent to translate more easily into innovation and leadership.

5. What role does inequality play in shaping talent?
Access to quality education, digital tools and mentorship varies widely. This means opportunities to develop and apply critical thinking are unevenly distributed.

6. How can India better harness its young talent?
By reforming assessment systems, strengthening industry-academia linkages, expanding skilling opportunities and creating environments where experimentation is supported.

7. What role do organisations like Smile Foundation play?
They help bridge systemic gaps by providing holistic education, skilling and health support, especially in underserved communities, enabling youth to develop confidence, curiosity and employable skills.

8. Is curiosity enough for economic growth?
Curiosity is essential but not sufficient. It must be supported by systems that convert ideas into outcomes through infrastructure, funding and opportunities.

Categories
Gender Women Empowerment

Unpaid Care Limiting Women

Summary: Key Takeaways

  • Unpaid care work is a major barrier to women’s workforce participation globally
  • Women spend 3x more time on unpaid care than men
  • Over 708 million women are excluded from the labour force due to care responsibilities
  • Unpaid care contributes significantly to economies but remains unrecognised and unpaid
  • Lack of public services increases the burden on women
  • Organisations like Smile Foundation help reduce and redistribute unpaid care through education, healthcare and livelihood programmes
  • Addressing unpaid care is essential for inclusive economic growth and gender equality

For millions of mothers and women around the globe, the day begins as early as 6:30 am, before the city fully stirs. They prepare breakfast, pack school lunches, get young children ready and tend to aging parents or in-laws. By 9 am, when offices begin to fill, these women have already completed several hours of labour, none of which is paid, recorded or formally recognised. This is the reality for several women worldwide. When they consider taking up full-time employment, the math often does not add up. Who will pick up the children? Who will care for the elderly? The answer, more often than not, is obvious: they will. And so, they stay home. 

The scale of this imbalance is stark at the global level. According to the International Labour Organization, unpaid care responsibilities keep over 708 million women out of the labour force. In comparison, the figure for men stands at just 40 million. This disparity underscores the deeply gendered nature of care work, and the fact that it is not merely a private choice, but a socially structured expectation. 

This also points to the roots of the inequality, which lie in deeply embedded gender norms that define caregiving as inherently feminine. From early socialisation to media representation, women are positioned as natural caregivers, while men are framed as primary breadwinners. Even as women’s educational attainment has risen globally, these norms persist, creating what scholars describe as the “double burden”: the expectation that women will engage in paid work without relinquishing their primary responsibility for unpaid domestic labour. 

The issue at a glance 

In India, this imbalance takes on a sharper edge. The country speaks the language of growth, of trillion-dollar targets, digital futures and women-led development, but beneath these ambitions lies an often ignored question: what sustains the everyday lives that make such progress possible? Care work is not incidental or emotional labour; it is foundational. It enables workers to arrive on time, children to attend school and households to function with continuity. However, despite its centrality to economic and social life, it remains largely invisible in policy and planning. 

According to UN estimates, men spend an average of about 98 minutes a day on unpaid tasks, while women spend nearly 301 minutes, over three times as much, highlighting the persistent imbalance in how care responsibilities are distributed. This unequal distribution produces what economists term time poverty: a condition in which individuals lack discretionary time due to the demands of unpaid labour. For women, time poverty directly constrains their ability to enter, remain in or advance within the workforce. 

The economic implications of this invisible labour are immense. Women perform over three-quarters of unpaid care work globally, contributing billions of hours each day. If this labour

were assigned a monetary value, it would account for a significant share of global GDP, yet it remains excluded from national accounting systems. This statistical invisibility reinforces the perception that unpaid care work is not “real” work, thereby justifying its continued neglect in policy frameworks. This neglect has tangible consequences. When governments underinvest in public services such as childcare, eldercare, healthcare, etc., the burden of care is transferred to households. Within those households, it is overwhelmingly women who absorb the additional responsibilities. This creates a loop of inadequate public infrastructure that increases unpaid care demands, which in turn limits women’s workforce participation, ultimately constraining economic growth. 

Beyond workforce entry, unpaid care work also shapes women’s career trajectories. Women who do participate in paid employment often face constraints that limit their growth. They may avoid jobs requiring long hours, travel or relocation even if they come associated with higher-paying and leadership roles. Moreover, the burden of unpaid care work is also not evenly distributed among women. It intersects with class, caste, geography and many other social factors. Middle and upper-class women often outsource domestic labour to paid workers, who come from marginalized communities, thereby redistributing but not eliminating the gendered nature of care work. 

Recent global crises have further exposed these inequalities. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the closure of schools and care facilities led to a surge in unpaid care work, disproportionately affecting women. Many women reduced their working hours or exited the labour force entirely, highlighting the fragility of their economic participation in the absence of supportive care systems. 

Smile Foundation’s role in addressing unpaid care

Addressing unpaid care is not only about policy, but also about building ecosystems that reduce the burden on women. This is where development organisations like Smile Foundation play a critical role.

1. Education support for children
Through our education programmes, Smile Foundation ensures that children, especially from underserved communities, have access to structured learning environments. This reduces the caregiving burden on mothers and enables them to explore livelihood opportunities.

2. Healthcare access through Smile on Wheels
By providing doorstep healthcare services, Smile Foundation reduces the time women spend managing family health needs, a major component of unpaid care.

3. Women empowerment and skilling programmes
Smile Foundation’s livelihood and skilling initiatives equip women with employable skills, enabling them to transition from unpaid care roles to income-generating work.

4. Community engagement and awareness
Through grassroots interventions, the organisation promotes shared responsibility within households and communities, encouraging a shift in traditional gender norms around care.

These interventions do not eliminate unpaid care, but they reduce, redistribute and recognise it, creating pathways for women’s economic participation.

The way out 

Addressing this invisible burden requires a multifaceted approach. Policy interventions must prioritise investment in the care economy, including accessible childcare, eldercare services and healthcare infrastructure. Evidence consistently shows that such investments increase women’s labour force participation by alleviating time constraints. Additionally, policies such as paid parental leave, particularly those that incentivise fathers’ involvement, can help redistribute care responsibilities more equitably. 

Equally crucial is the recognition and measurement of unpaid care work. Time-use surveys and gender-sensitive economic indicators can make this labour visible, providing a foundation for more informed policymaking. Some economists have advocated for the inclusion of unpaid care work in satellite national accounts, thereby acknowledging its contribution to economic systems. 

Lastly, it is pertinent that structural changes are accompanied by cultural transformation. The redistribution of care work within households is essential to achieving gender equality.

Encouraging men to take on a greater share of domestic responsibilities will challenge entrenched norms and create a space for women to participate more fully in the workforce.

FAQs 

1. What is unpaid care work ?

Unpaid care work includes activities such as cooking, cleaning, childcare, eldercare and managing household needs, done without financial compensation.

2. Why is unpaid care work important?
It sustains households and economies by enabling paid workers to function, but it remains invisible in economic systems.

3. How does unpaid care affect women’s employment?
It limits women’s ability to take up jobs, work full-time or advance in their careers due to time constraints.

4. Can unpaid care work be reduced?
Yes, through better public services, shared household responsibilities and supportive policies like childcare and parental leave.

5. What role do organisations like Smile Foundation play?
They reduce the burden of unpaid care by providing education, healthcare and livelihood opportunities, enabling women to participate in the workforce.

Categories
Smile

Managing Menstruation Without Resources

Picture yourself waking up one morning to head off to school or work, and you realise that you’ve started your period and don’t have sanitary napkins (aka pads). You have no private toilet or clean water. Now imagine this happening every month influencing all aspects of your plans, decisions and if you allow me to stretch it a bit, even your dreams. That’s the reality for many girls and women across the world. 

The issue gets exacerbated for women and girls living in conflict-affected areas where their menstrual concerns are pushed back at the bottom of the list of essentials. 

Although menstruation is a normal and healthy part of life, for most women and girls in many societies, the experiences are still limited by cultural taboos and discriminatory social norms. 

Summary: Key Takeaways

  • A fifth of women in Nepal and a third of women in Kenya did not always have enough menstrual materials while working outside their homes

What Does ‘Invisible Labour’ Mean in Menstrual Health?

Invisible labour is the work that often goes unnoticed or undervalued. When it comes to menstruation, this can mean: 

  • Finding or creating makeshift menstrual products, like rags, old clothes or natural materials.
  • Planning your day around where you can find toilets and water.
  • Dealing with pain, anxiety and the constant worry about leaks or stains.
  • Navigating societal taboos that demand secrecy and limit your freedom to move or participate.
  • Quietly educating yourself, often without the benefit of open conversations or formal guidance.
  • This silence and isolation can be draining, emotionally challenging and, most importantly, it shouldn’t have to be this way.

Affordability and Availability

For many families, particularly in rural areas, the cost of sanitary pads remains a significant barrier to menstrual health management. This financial constraint often forces women and girls to use cloth or other unsafe alternatives, which increases their risk of infection and discomfort. Furthermore, millions of adolescent schoolgirls face unequal access to essential hygiene resources, such as water and soap. By ensuring access to safe and affordable sanitary materials, we can significantly reduce the risk of infections and improve the overall well-being of girls and women.

The Weight of Silence, Stigma on Reproductive Health

For generations, taboos have led girls to hide their periods and suffer in silence. In many households, girls are discouraged from entering kitchens, visiting places of worship or even talking about their own bodies. This culture of silence leaves many girls unprepared for their first period, resulting in confusion and anxiety. Myths and misinformation thrive, while practical knowledge is overshadowed by feelings of shame.

This silence also adds to the burden. Girls and women have to plan how to wash and dry clothes without anyone noticing, how to dispose of waste discreetly, and how to explain any stains without revealing the truth.

These taboos get passed down through generations, influencing how women view their bodies and reproductive health. When menstruation is seen as something to be ashamed of, that silence also creeps into conversations about contraception and maternal care, which in turn limits knowledge, confidence and autonomy. Consequently, many women end up fearing or avoiding contraception, often feeling unsure or misinformed about their own bodies. The Supreme Court’s push to include menstrual health in school curricula acknowledges that breaking down these early taboos is crucial for empowering girls and ensuring they have dignity, participation and informed choices throughout their reproductive journeys.

The Education and Opportunity Gap

For many girls, the onset of menstruation can feel like the beginning of a restricted world. In India, UNICEF reports that a significant number of girls miss school during their periods, and tragically, many drop out after reaching puberty. The reasons for this are clear: they often lack access to sanitary products, private or functioning toilets, and safe disposal options for used products. Additionally, many face the fear of embarrassment, teasing or feeling isolated from their peers.

Globally, only about 39% of schools provide menstrual health education. When girls miss school, it can diminish their engagement in learning, often leading to permanent dropout. For countless young women, this situation can lead to early marriage and a marked decrease in economic and social mobility. The overwhelming burden of managing menstruation becomes a significant obstacle in their lives.

Gender Equality

Promoting menstrual health and hygiene is an important means for safeguarding women’s dignity, privacy, bodily integrity and, consequently, their self-efficacy. Awareness of MHH contributes to building an enabling environment of non-discrimination and gender equality in which female voices are heard, girls have choices about their future and women have options to become leaders and managers. 

Dignity Is Non-Negotiable

Over the past decade, India has made notable progress in menstrual health. Governments, NGOs and social enterprises have expanded access to sanitary products, while initiatives like Smile Foundation’s programmes have helped normalise conversations and dispel myths. Under the Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP), sanitary pads are available at just ₹1 per pad through Jan Aushadhi Kendras nationwide.

However, invisible labour still burdens millions. The task now is to turn rights into lived realities, with stronger systems, inclusive infrastructure and sustained community engagement. Only by reducing this invisible labour can we unlock real opportunities and the full agency of every girl and woman, and claim genuine progress.

FAQs

1. What challenges do women face when managing menstruation without resources?
Many women lack access to sanitary products, clean water, private toilets and safe disposal systems. This forces them to use unsafe alternatives, manage hygiene discreetly and plan daily activities around limited facilities.

2. What does ‘invisible labour’ mean in menstrual health?
Invisible labour refers to the hidden effort involved in managing menstruation, such as finding materials, maintaining hygiene, coping with pain, navigating stigma and planning routines around restricted access to resources.

3. How do cultural taboos impact menstrual health?
Taboos create silence and shame, leaving girls unprepared for menstruation. They restrict mobility, limit open conversations and perpetuate misinformation, affecting confidence, health and participation in daily life.

4. Why do girls miss school during menstruation?
Lack of sanitary products, private toilets, disposal facilities and fear of embarrassment often lead girls to miss school or drop out entirely, affecting their long-term education and opportunities.

5. How does menstrual health relate to gender equality?
Access to menstrual hygiene is directly linked to dignity, mobility, education and economic participation. Without it, women and girls face systemic barriers to equality.

6. What steps can improve menstrual health management?
Ensuring affordable sanitary products, building safe sanitation infrastructure, promoting menstrual education and breaking societal taboos are key to improving menstrual health outcomes.

7. What role do organisations like Smile Foundation play?
Smile Foundation supports menstrual health through awareness programmes, access to hygiene resources and community engagement, helping reduce stigma and improve dignity and participation for women and girls.

Categories
CSR In The Spotlight Insights

Blueleaf Cares Vision for Agar Malwa

Executive Summary

In rural India, development challenges rarely exist in isolation. A failed monsoon affects crops, which affects incomes, which affects nutrition, education and health. Addressing these issues in silos often limits impact.

The Blueleaf Cares Integrated Community Development Project in Agar Malwa, Madhya Pradesh, responds to this complexity with an integrated, long-term approach. Designed by Blueleaf Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd. and implemented by Smile Foundation, the initiative aims to strengthen healthcare access, build climate-resilient livelihoods, improve education, and restore local ecosystems across 25 villages, directly impacting over 10,000 people.

Over a five-year horizon, the programme seeks not just to deliver services, but to build resilient, self-reliant communities where people and nature thrive together.

Agar Malwa: A Region at the Intersection of Climate and Livelihood Vulnerability

Agar Malwa, located on the Agar Plateau of Madhya Pradesh, reflects the realities of agrarian India under climate stress. Nearly 70% of its land is under cultivation and agriculture, along with livestock rearing, forms the backbone of local livelihoods. Yet this system is largely rain-fed, making it deeply vulnerable to erratic rainfall patterns, recurring droughts and growing water scarcity.

Rising temperatures and frequent heatwaves, often exceeding 40°C, have intensified the strain, affecting not only agricultural productivity but also human health and well-being. Environmental degradation, including groundwater depletion, soil erosion and deforestation, further compounds these pressures.

Social indicators mirror these structural challenges. The region’s average literacy rate stands at 69%, with female literacy at just 56%, pointing to persistent gender disparities. Access to healthcare remains limited, and communities continue to face a dual burden of undernutrition and emerging non-communicable diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. While institutional deliveries have improved, the quality and continuity of maternal and child healthcare services remain uneven.

These interconnected vulnerabilities, economic, environmental and social, make Agar Malwa a landscape where fragmented interventions are insufficient. What is required is a model that recognises and responds to this interdependence.

Blueleaf Cares: A Framework for Integrated Rural Transformation

The Blueleaf Cares initiative is grounded in a vision of holistic rural sustainability, where development is both inclusive and environmentally responsible.

Its approach is anchored in five guiding principles:

  • Community Centric – ensuring local ownership and participation
  • Adaptation and Awareness – building understanding of climate and health risks
  • Restoration and Resilience – strengthening ecosystems and livelihoods
  • Education and Empowerment – enabling long-term social mobility
  • Skilling and Sustainability – creating pathways for future-ready livelihoods

These principles translate into a programme that does not treat healthcare, education, livelihoods and environment as separate verticals, but as interconnected systems.

From Design to Delivery: Smile Foundation as the Implementation Partner

As the implementation partner, Smile Foundation plays a critical role in translating the programme’s vision into measurable, on-ground outcomes.

The approach begins with a “Zero + Four Year” implementation model, starting with a comprehensive baseline survey across all 25 villages. This initial phase identifies gaps across health, education, livelihoods, skilling and environmental conditions, ensuring that interventions are tailored to local realities.

What follows is a process of community mobilisation and participatory planning, where village-level priorities shape programme design. This is not a top-down delivery model. It is a collaborative process where communities move from being beneficiaries to active stakeholders.

Smile Foundation’s role extends across:

  • Community engagement and trust-building
  • Programme implementation across sectors
  • Capacity building of local institutions
  • Monitoring, evaluation and adaptive learning

This ensures that interventions are not only delivered, but sustained.

A Multi-Dimensional Plan of Action

The programme unfolds across four core pillars, each addressing a critical dimension of rural life while reinforcing the others.

Climate-Resilient Livelihoods

Recognising the vulnerability of rain-fed agriculture, the initiative promotes climate-smart farming practices, livelihood diversification and capacity building. Farmers are supported in adopting adaptive techniques, while Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) are strengthened to improve market access and income stability.

Ecosystem Restoration

Environmental sustainability is central to the programme. Efforts focus on restoring degraded land, conserving biodiversity and improving ecosystem services. These interventions are essential not only for ecological balance but also for sustaining agricultural productivity and livelihoods.

Education and Skilling

Education is approached as both an immediate need and a long-term investment. The programme works to improve access to quality education, enhance learning environments, and build environmental awareness among students. At the same time, rural youth are equipped with 21st-century skills and green job capabilities, preparing them for emerging economic opportunities.

Health and Nutrition

Healthcare interventions aim to strengthen primary care access while addressing critical issues such as anaemia, malnutrition and non-communicable diseases. Awareness campaigns promote preventive health practices, while linkages to public health schemes improve access to services.

Strengthening Local Systems for Sustainability

A defining feature of Blueleaf Cares is its emphasis on institutional strengthening.

The programme works through a network of local bodies, including:

  • Gram Panchayats and Village Development Committees
  • Biodiversity Management Committees
  • Self-Help Groups and Farmer Producer Organisations

Frontline workers — ASHAs, ANMs, Anganwadi workers, teachers and youth volunteers — are trained and supported to extend services at the last mile. Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) activities further reinforce awareness and participation.

Partnerships with district and line departments across Health, Education, Agriculture, Forest and Rural Development ensure convergence with existing systems.

This approach transforms communities into active participants, capable of sustaining progress beyond the programme’s lifecycle.

Government Convergence: Linking Local Action to National Priorities

To ensure scale and sustainability, the programme aligns with key government initiatives, including:

  • Ayushman Bharat
  • Anemia Mukt Bharat
  • ICDS
  • RMNCH+A
  • NPCDCS

By integrating with these schemes, the programme strengthens existing systems rather than duplicating efforts, enabling more efficient and impactful delivery.

Scale and Reach

The Blueleaf Cares initiative spans 25 villages in Agar Block, with a direct outreach of over 10,000 beneficiaries.

These include:

  • Small and marginal farmers and livestock rearers
  • Women, adolescents and elderly individuals requiring improved healthcare and nutrition services
  • Students, teachers and rural youth seeking better education and skilling opportunities

A Partnership That Reflects a Shift in Development Thinking

At its core, the Blueleaf Cares and Smile Foundation partnership represents a shift from fragmented interventions to integrated development thinking.

It acknowledges that:

  • Livelihoods are linked to climate
  • Health is linked to nutrition and income
  • Education is linked to long-term resilience

And that meaningful change requires addressing these connections simultaneously.

Conclusion

In regions like Agar Malwa, where vulnerabilities are layered and persistent, development must be equally nuanced.

The Blueleaf Cares initiative, with Smile Foundation as its implementation partner, offers a model that moves beyond short-term solutions. It focuses on building systems, strengthening communities and creating pathways for sustainable growth.

Because lasting impact is not created through isolated efforts.
It is built through integrated systems, local ownership and sustained commitment.

FAQs

What is the Blueleaf Cares programme?

An integrated rural development initiative focused on healthcare, livelihoods, education and environmental sustainability in Agar Malwa.

What is Smile Foundation’s role?

Smile Foundation is the implementation partner, responsible for executing and sustaining programme interventions on the ground.

How many people will benefit?

Over 10,000 individuals across 25 villages in Agar Block.

What makes this programme unique?

Its integrated, multi-sectoral approach that addresses interconnected challenges rather than isolated issues.

How does it ensure long-term impact?

By strengthening local institutions, aligning with government schemes and building community ownership.

Categories
CSR Insights

Indian Billionaire Philanthropy: Big Giving

Executive Summary

India’s billionaire class is expanding rapidly, and with it, the visibility of the Indian billionaire philanthropist. Large donations, high-profile foundations and CSR-led initiatives have positioned billionaires as key actors in India’s development ecosystem.

However, data reveals a more nuanced reality.

Despite rising visibility, Indian billionaires contribute an estimated 5–15% of total formal philanthropy, with giving concentrated among a small group of donors. Much of what is perceived as billionaire philanthropy is routed through corporate CSR, while critical sectors remain underfunded.

For organisations like Smile Foundation, this highlights a central challenge:
bridging the gap between high-value philanthropy and sustained, on-ground impact.

India’s Billionaire Boom and the Rise of Philanthropy

India is now home to over 200 billionaires, making it one of the largest hubs of concentrated wealth globally. Prominent names such as Mukesh Ambani, Gautam Adani, Shiv Nadar and Azim Premji have become synonymous with both economic growth and large-scale philanthropy.

The emergence of the Indian billionaire philanthropist has reshaped how development funding is discussed in India.

From education institutions to healthcare systems, billionaire-led initiatives are increasingly visible.

How Much Do Indian Billionaire Philanthropists Actually Give?

India’s total philanthropic ecosystem, including private donations and CSR, is estimated at over ₹1.2 lakh crore annually.

In comparison:

  • Top 10 billionaire donors contribute roughly ₹4000–6000 crore annually
  • Total contributions by ultra-wealthy individuals are estimated at ₹10,000–20,000 crore

Concentration of Giving: A Few Lead, Many Follow Slowly

Philanthropy among Indian billionaires is not evenly distributed.

A small number of individuals account for a large share of donations.

For example:

  • Shiv Nadar consistently leads giving in India, contributing over ₹2,000 crore annually through the Shiv Nadar Foundation
  • Azim Premji has made one of the largest philanthropic commitments globally through the Azim Premji Foundation

Beyond these leaders, most billionaires contribute relatively modest amounts compared to their wealth.

What This Means

The rise of the Indian billionaire philanthropist is not a collective movement, it is driven by a few committed individuals.

CSR vs Personal Philanthropy: Understanding the Difference

India’s philanthropic ecosystem is uniquely shaped by the Companies Act 2013, which mandates corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending.

This creates a critical distinction:

Corporate-led giving

  • Reliance Foundation
  • Adani Foundation

Personal philanthropy

  • Independent foundations and trusts
  • Direct donations by individuals

Why This Matters

A significant portion of what is labelled as “Indian billionaire philanthropist giving” is actually corporate spending, not personal wealth redistribution.

This inflates perceptions of individual generosity and complicates accurate analysis.

The Ground Reality: Where Funding Meets Impact

For organisations like Smile Foundation, philanthropy is operational.

Large donations create visibility, but sustained funding creates impact.

Healthcare Access

Smile Foundation’s Smile on Wheels programme delivers primary healthcare services to underserved communities.

These interventions highlight a persistent gap:

  • Millions lack access to basic healthcare
  • Funding must be continuous, not episodic

Education for Underserved Children

Through Mission Education, children from marginalised communities receive access to quality education.

Despite large philanthropic investments in education, gaps remain in:

  • Last-mile delivery
  • Retention and continuity
  • Digital access

Bridging the Digital Divide

The Smile Twin e-Learning Programme addresses digital inequality, a challenge that became stark during the pandemic.

This is an area where billionaire philanthropy is still evolving.

Women’s Health and Entrepreneurship

Programmes like Swabhiman focus on preventive healthcare and entrepreneurship among women

These are critical but underfunded areas, often overshadowed by larger institutional investments.

Sectoral Priorities: Where Billionaires Focus Their Giving

The Indian billionaire philanthropist typically prioritises:

1. Education

The largest share of funding goes to schools, universities and scholarships.

2. Healthcare

Hospitals, disease programmes and CSR-led health initiatives.

3. Rural Development

Livelihoods, skilling and community infrastructure.

The Missing Middle

Several critical sectors remain underfunded:

  • Urban poverty
  • Informal labour and migrant workers
  • Mental health
  • Climate resilience

These gaps highlight the need for more strategic and diversified philanthropy.

The Role of Implementation Organisations

Organisations like Smile Foundation play a crucial role in ensuring that philanthropy translates into real impact.

We act as:

  • Bridges between donors and communities
  • Implementers of scalable programmes
  • Custodians of accountability and outcomes

This work demonstrates that effective philanthropy depends on execution, not just funding size.

The Way Forward

To strengthen the impact of billionaire philanthropy in India, the ecosystem needs:

  • Greater transparency in giving
  • Increased focus on underserved sectors
  • Stronger collaboration between donors and implementation partners

Conclusion

The rise of the Indian billionaire philanthropist marks an important shift in India’s development landscape.

But the story is not just about big donations.

It is about:

  • How much is given
  • Where it is directed
  • And how effectively it is used

Until these align, the true potential of philanthropy will remain only partially realised.

FAQs

1. What is an Indian billionaire philanthropist?

An Indian billionaire philanthropist is a high-net-worth individual who donates significant resources to social causes, either through personal foundations, trusts or corporate CSR initiatives.

2. How much do Indian billionaires contribute to philanthropy?

Estimates suggest that Indian billionaires contribute around ₹10,000–20,000 crore annually, accounting for roughly 5–15% of total formal philanthropy.

3. What is the difference between CSR and personal philanthropy?

CSR is mandatory corporate spending under the Companies Act, while personal philanthropy involves voluntary donations from an individual’s wealth.

4. Which sectors receive the most funding from Indian billionaire philanthropists?

Education receives the largest share, followed by healthcare and rural development.

5. Why is there limited data on billionaire philanthropy in India?

India lacks a centralised reporting system and much giving happens through private trusts, CSR channels and family offices, making it difficult to track accurately.

6. How do organisations like Smile Foundation use philanthropic funding?

We implement programmes in education, healthcare, women empowerment and livelihood, ensuring that funds translate into measurable, long-term impact at the community level.

Categories
Gender Girl Child Health

Menstrual Hygiene Still a Barrier to Equality for Millions of Girls

In 2023, a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India brought renewed attention to menstrual hygiene as a matter of dignity, health, and equality. The Court underscored a simple but powerful idea: access to menstrual hygiene is not a privilege — it is a right.

Yet, for millions of girls across India, this right remains unevenly realised.

Menstruation continues to shape not just health outcomes, but also education, mobility and life trajectories. For many, it is the point at which childhood begins to narrow — marked by silence, stigma and structural barriers that quietly push girls out of classrooms and into early adulthood.

The weight of silence: Traditions and taboos

For generations, menstruation has been surrounded by deeply embedded cultural beliefs. In many communities, it is still treated as something impure — something to be hidden.

Girls are told:

  • not to enter kitchens
  • not to visit places of worship
  • not to speak about their bodies

These practices do more than enforce silence. They shape how girls perceive themselves — often associating a natural biological process with shame.

This silence also means that many girls enter puberty without basic information. The first experience of menstruation can be confusing, even frightening. Without guidance, myths replace facts and hesitation replaces confidence.

The education gap: When periods lead to dropouts

One of the most visible consequences of poor menstrual hygiene access is its impact on education.

According to estimates from UNICEF, a significant proportion of girls in India miss school during their periods, and many eventually drop out altogether after reaching puberty.

The reasons are layered:

  • Lack of access to sanitary products
  • Absence of functional, private toilets in schools
  • Fear of leakage or embarrassment
  • Lack of disposal facilities

For a girl without access to sanitary pads, attending school during menstruation can mean navigating discomfort, anxiety and social stigma simultaneously.

Over time, absenteeism becomes disengagement. And disengagement often becomes dropout.

From classrooms to early marriages

The consequences of dropout extend far beyond education.

In many cases, when girls leave school after puberty, they become more vulnerable to early marriage. The transition is subtle but consequential:

  • Education stops
  • Mobility reduces
  • Domestic responsibilities increase
  • Marriage becomes the next expected step

Menstrual health, in this context, is not just a health issue. It is closely tied to child marriage, economic participation and gender equality.

The evolution of menstrual hygiene products — and the access gap

Over the years, India has seen significant progress in the availability of menstrual hygiene products.

From cloth-based practices to:

  • disposable sanitary pads
  • low-cost pad initiatives
  • biodegradable alternatives
  • menstrual cups

there has been a visible shift in both innovation and awareness.

Government programmes and social enterprises have played a role in expanding access. Yet, affordability and availability remain uneven — especially in rural and underserved regions.

For many girls:

  • pads are still considered expensive
  • supply is inconsistent
  • choices are limited

As a result, unsafe or unhygienic alternatives continue to be used, increasing the risk of infections and long-term health issues.

The infrastructure challenge: Toilets, water and dignity

Access to menstrual products is only one part of the equation. Equally critical is the infrastructure that supports their safe and dignified use.

Across many parts of India:

  • school toilets are non-functional or poorly maintained
  • lack of water makes hygiene difficult
  • disposal systems are absent

For adolescent girls, this creates a daily negotiation between discomfort and dignity.

The challenge extends beyond schools.

Public spaces and travel

Women and girls travelling long distances, by bus or train, often face a different but equally pressing issue: the absence of clean, accessible public toilets.

Changing a sanitary napkin in:

  • an unclean restroom
  • a crowded public facility
  • or not at all

is not just inconvenient. It poses serious health risks and reinforces the idea that women’s needs are secondary in public infrastructure design.

Health implications: Beyond discomfort

Poor menstrual hygiene is often discussed in terms of inconvenience. But its health implications are far more serious.

Inadequate menstrual hygiene can lead to:

  • reproductive tract infections
  • urinary tract infections
  • skin irritation and discomfort

More importantly, it can delay care-seeking behaviour. When menstruation is stigmatised, symptoms are often ignored or normalised, preventing timely medical intervention.

The mental and emotional toll

Less visible, but equally significant, is the psychological impact.

For many girls, menstruation brings:

  • anxiety about leakage or staining
  • fear of being teased or isolated
  • reluctance to participate in school or social activities

This can affect:

  • confidence
  • self-esteem
  • participation in public life

Over time, these experiences shape how girls see their place in the world.

The role of awareness and education

Addressing menstrual hygiene requires more than products and infrastructure. It requires shifting conversations.

This means:

  • integrating menstrual education into school curricula
  • engaging boys and men to reduce stigma
  • creating safe spaces for open dialogue

When menstruation is normalised, girls are more likely to seek information, support and care.

Smile Foundation’s approach: Bridging gaps on the ground

Organisations like Smile Foundation have been working at the intersection of education, health and community engagement — recognising that menstrual hygiene is central to all three.

1. Awareness and education

Through its programmes, Smile Foundation works with adolescents to:

  • build awareness around menstrual health
  • dispel myths and misconceptions
  • encourage open conversations

2. Access to sanitary products

Efforts are made to improve access to affordable menstrual hygiene products, particularly in underserved communities.

3. School-based interventions

By strengthening school environments, the organisation helps create:

  • safer, more inclusive spaces for girls
  • systems that support continued education during menstruation

4. Community engagement

Working with parents and community leaders is critical to:

  • shift long-held beliefs
  • build supportive ecosystems for girls

A systems issue, not a singular problem

Menstrual hygiene is often approached as a standalone issue. But in reality, it intersects with:

  • education systems
  • public health infrastructure
  • gender norms
  • economic access

Addressing it requires coordinated action across these domains.

What needs to change

1. Policy to practice

While policies and legal recognition — such as the recent Supreme Court judgment — are important, implementation remains uneven.

2. Infrastructure investment

Clean, functional toilets with water and disposal systems must become non-negotiable in:

  • schools
  • public spaces
  • transport hubs

3. Affordable access

Sustainable models are needed to ensure that menstrual products are:

  • affordable
  • consistently available
  • environmentally responsible

4. Normalising conversations

Breaking stigma requires sustained engagement.

Reimagining dignity

At its core, menstrual hygiene is about dignity.

It is about ensuring that no girl has to:

  • miss school
  • compromise her health
  • or feel ashamed of her body

simply because she does not have access to basic resources.

The Supreme Court’s recognition of menstrual hygiene as a right is an important step. But rights must translate into everyday realities.

For millions of girls in India, that journey is still ongoing.

The way forward

Creating a future where menstrual hygiene is no longer a barrier requires:

  • stronger systems
  • inclusive infrastructure
  • sustained community engagement
  • and a commitment to listening to girls’ lived experiences

Because when girls are able to manage menstruation safely and with dignity, the impact extends far beyond health.

It keeps them in school, expands their choices and strengthens their agency.

And ultimately, it brings us closer to a more equitable society — one where something as natural as menstruation no longer limits what a girl can become.

Categories
Smile Insights

Cyberbullying and Children: Understanding the Invisible Harm

For many children today, the boundaries between online and offline life no longer exist. Friendships, classrooms and identities are increasingly mediated through screens. But so is harm, especially the one at the cross-section of cyberbullying and children.

Cyberbullying and Children-and-technology-connection-visualised.

Cyberbullying, once dismissed as an extension of schoolyard teasing, has evolved into a complex, persistent and often invisible form of violence. Unlike traditional bullying, it does not end with the school day. It follows children home, into their bedrooms and into spaces that were once considered safe.

Understanding cyberbullying today requires more than awareness. It requires systems to identify, track and respond to harm in ways that reflect how children actually experience the digital world.

What is cyberbullying, and why is it different?

Cyberbullying refers to the use of digital platforms—social media, messaging apps, gaming environments—to harass, threaten or humiliate others.

But its impact is amplified by three structural features:

  • Permanence: Harmful content can remain online indefinitely
  • Scale: A single incident can reach hundreds, sometimes thousands
  • Inescapability: There is no physical boundary to retreat from

According to UNICEF, over one in three young people across 30 countries report being victims of online bullying. In India, where smartphone access has expanded rapidly, children are entering digital spaces faster than support systems are evolving to protect them.

What the research tells us about cyberbullying and children

Over the past decade, cyberbullying has moved from anecdotal concern to a well-established field of study.

A landmark meta-analysis by Mitch van Geel and colleagues found a strong association between cyberbullying and suicidal ideation among adolescents. Other studies have consistently linked it to:

  • Depression and anxiety
  • Low self-esteem
  • Academic decline
  • Social withdrawal

Researchers like Sameer Hinduja and Justin W. Patchin have also shown that cyberbullying rarely exists in isolation. It often overlaps with offline bullying, reinforcing cycles of harm across environments.

Importantly, children are not just victims or perpetrators. Many occupy both roles at different times, while a large number are silent bystanders—witnessing harm without the tools or confidence to intervene.

The Indian context: A growing but under-recognised challenge

In India, cyberbullying is shaped by a distinct set of social and structural factors:

  • Digital access outpacing digital literacy
  • Gendered harassment, especially targeting adolescent girls
  • Language diversity, enabling region-specific abuse patterns
  • Limited reporting mechanisms in schools and communities

Despite increasing awareness, cyberbullying often remains underreported. Children may not recognise it as abuse or may fear repercussions—loss of device access, blame or social isolation.

This invisibility makes tracking the issue particularly difficult, and addressing it even more so.

Why tracking cyberbullying is so challenging

Unlike physical bullying, cyberbullying does not leave visible markers. It is fragmented across platforms, private chats and ephemeral content.

Tracking it requires navigating multiple challenges:

1. Lack of standard definitions

Different studies and institutions define cyberbullying differently. This leads to wide variations in prevalence data — ranging from 10% to 40%.

2. Platform fragmentation

Children move across platforms, WhatsApp, Instagram, gaming apps, making it difficult to monitor patterns of harm.

3. Ephemeral content

Features like disappearing messages reduce traceability, making evidence collection harder.

4. Underreporting

Children often do not report incidents due to fear, shame or lack of trust in response systems.

So how can we track cyberbullying effectively?

Tracking cyberbullying is not about surveillance. It is about building responsive ecosystems that can detect early signs of distress and intervene appropriately.

1. Strengthening school-based reporting systems

Schools remain a critical point of contact.

  • Anonymous reporting mechanisms can encourage disclosure
  • Teachers need training to recognise behavioural changes
  • Cyberbullying must be integrated into school safety policies

2. Building digital literacy among children

Children need to be equipped not just to use technology, but to navigate it safely.

This includes:

  • recognising harmful behaviour
  • understanding privacy settings
  • knowing when and how to seek help

3. Engaging parents without over-surveillance

Parental involvement is crucial, but excessive monitoring can backfire.

Effective approaches include:

  • open conversations
  • trust-based communication
  • awareness of platforms children use

4. Leveraging peer networks

Peers are often the first witnesses.

Programs that encourage:

  • bystander intervention
  • peer support systems
    can significantly reduce harm.

5. Integrating mental health screening

Cyberbullying often manifests as emotional distress before it is reported as abuse.

Simple tools, regular check-ins, counselling access, can help identify early warning signs.

Moving from awareness to action: The role of organisations

Addressing cyberbullying requires moving beyond isolated interventions toward integrated child protection frameworks.

This is where organisations like Smile Foundation play a critical role.

Smile Foundation’s approach: Supporting children beyond the classroom

Smile Foundation’s work with children, across education and healthcare, has increasingly recognised that learning outcomes cannot be separated from emotional well-being.

Through our education and health programmes, the organisation integrates mental health awareness and psychosocial support into its interventions.

1. Creating safe spaces for children

Smile Foundation’s learning environments prioritise:

  • trust-building
  • open dialogue
  • emotional safety

Children are encouraged to express concerns, online and offline, without fear of judgment.

2. Mental health awareness and counselling

Through its outreach, Smile Foundation promotes:

  • awareness around emotional well-being
  • access to counselling support where needed
  • early identification of distress

This becomes particularly important in cases where cyberbullying may not be explicitly reported but manifests through behavioural changes.

3. Engaging communities and parents

Recognising that children do not operate in isolation, Smile Foundation works with:

  • parents
  • caregivers
  • community stakeholders

to build awareness around emerging risks, including digital harm.

4. Integrating digital awareness into education

As digital access expands, Smile Foundation’s programmes increasingly emphasise:

  • responsible technology use
  • online safety practices
  • critical thinking in digital spaces

What more needs to be done

While interventions are growing, the scale of the challenge requires a broader shift.

1. Policy alignment

India’s regulatory frameworks need stronger alignment between:

  • education systems
  • child protection mechanisms
  • digital governance

2. Platform accountability

Technology platforms must move toward:

  • safety-by-design features
  • stronger moderation systems
  • child-centric risk assessments

3. Data and research

There is a need for:

  • more India-specific longitudinal studies
  • better data on rural and underserved populations
  • intersectional analysis (gender, caste, socio-economic status)

Reframing the issue: From behaviour to systems

Cyberbullying is often framed as a behavioural issue — something children do to each other.

But this framing is incomplete.

It is also:

  • a design issue (how platforms function)
  • a systems issue (how institutions respond)
  • a social issue (how communities understand harm)

Addressing it requires coordinated action across all three.

A way forward

For children, the digital world is not separate from reality — it is part of it. Safety, therefore, cannot be limited to physical spaces.

Tracking cyberbullying is not about control. It is about visibility—ensuring that harm does not go unnoticed, unaddressed or normalised.

For organisations working with children, the path forward lies in:

  • integrating digital safety into existing programmes
  • strengthening mental health support systems
  • building trust-based reporting mechanisms
  • and engaging communities as active participants

Cyberbullying may be invisible, but its impact is not.

Recognising it, tracking it and responding to it with care and urgency is essential to ensuring that every child can grow, learn and participate in digital spaces without fear.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is cyberbullying, and how is it different from traditional bullying? Cyberbullying refers to the use of digital platforms — social media, messaging apps, gaming environments — to harass, threaten or humiliate others. Unlike traditional bullying, it does not end when the school day does. It is persistent, often anonymous, and can reach a large audience instantly. Harmful content can remain online indefinitely, and there is no physical space a child can retreat to for relief.

How common is cyberbullying among children in India? Globally, UNICEF reports that over one in three young people across 30 countries have experienced online bullying. In India, the challenge is compounded by rapidly expanding smartphone access, limited digital literacy, and insufficient reporting mechanisms in schools and communities. Many cases go unrecognised or unreported, making the true scale difficult to measure.

What are the signs that a child may be experiencing cyberbullying? Cyberbullying rarely announces itself. Warning signs often appear as behavioural changes — withdrawal from social interactions, declining academic performance, anxiety, low self-esteem or reluctance to use devices. Because children may not identify what they are experiencing as abuse, emotional distress is often the first indicator.

Why do children not report cyberbullying? Several barriers prevent children from coming forward. These include fear of losing access to devices, concern about being blamed, shame and a lack of trust in adult responses. In India, many children may also not recognise what they are experiencing as a form of harm, particularly when it happens across private messages or platforms parents are unaware of.

What can parents do without resorting to surveillance? Excessive monitoring can erode trust and push children to conceal their online experiences further. More effective approaches involve open, non-judgmental conversations about digital life, building awareness of the platforms children use and creating an environment where children feel safe disclosing problems without fear of punishment or device restrictions.

What role do schools play in addressing cyberbullying? Schools are a critical point of contact. Anonymous reporting mechanisms, teacher training to recognise early signs of distress, and the integration of cyberbullying into school safety policies all make a meaningful difference. In India, schools are required to form Anti-Bullying Committees, though their effectiveness depends heavily on awareness and implementation.

Is cyberbullying a behavioural problem or a systemic one? Both — and that distinction matters. While it involves individual behaviour, cyberbullying is also shaped by how platforms are designed, how institutions respond and how communities understand harm. Addressing it effectively requires coordinated action across all three, rather than placing responsibility solely on children or their families.

What needs to change at a policy and platform level? India’s regulatory frameworks need stronger alignment between education systems, child protection mechanisms and digital governance. Technology platforms must move toward safety-by-design features, stronger content moderation and child-centric risk assessments. There is also a significant need for more India-specific research, particularly on rural populations and the intersections of gender, caste and socio-economic status.

0%