Categories
Nutrition

Poshan Maah 2025: The Double Burden of Malnutrition

Imagine a community where one child is too weak from malnutrition to play, while next door another is battling childhood obesity and early diabetes. It sounds like a plot twist in a dark comedy, but it’s reality in many parts of the world today. This “double burden of malnutrition” means the paradoxical coexistence of undernutrition (not getting enough healthy food) and overnutrition (eating too much of the wrong foods).

How did we end up with such a nutritional yin-yang? More importantly, what’s being done about it, let’s dig in.

In India, conversations on nutrition always peak during Poshan Maah, the national nutrition month. It’s the perfect time to spotlight this paradox and ask: how can a country simultaneously struggle with malnutrition and obesity? And more importantly, what can be done about it – especially for mothers and children, the most vulnerable groups?

What is the “Double Burden” of malnutrition?

In the not-so-distant past, the word “malnutrition” conjured images of skinny, stunted children with not enough to eat. That’s still a critical problem – millions of children worldwide are undernourished – but now we have a plot twist. The double burden of malnutrition refers to situations where undernutrition and overnutrition exist together. Think of it as malnutrition’s way of hedging its bets: if lack of food doesn’t get you, excess junk might!

According to the World Health Organization, this double burden can occur within populations, households or even individuals. For example:

  1. Within a population: A country might have a high rate of childhood stunting and a growing rate of adult obesity at the same time.
  2. Within a household: One family could have an underweight child and an overweight parent living under one roof – a perplexing dinner table scenario where one person needs more calories and the other needs fewer (and healthier) calories.
  3. Within an individual: Yes, a single person can experience both forms of malnutrition. For instance, someone can be overweight but deficient in essential vitamins and minerals (a phenomenon sometimes called “hidden hunger”). Picture someone who lives on soda and chips – they may be heavy on the scale but still malnourished in nutrients.

In all its forms, malnutrition is basically an imbalance – either not enough nutrients or too many (especially too many empty calories). It’s like your body is Goldilocks, searching for the “just right” diet, but constantly getting either a porridge that’s too little or too much cake instead.

The global paradox: Undernourishment vs. obesity

If this sounds like a strange paradox, the numbers confirm it. Globally, malnutrition now has two faces. On one side, we have chronic undernutrition; on the other, rising overweight and obesity. Consider these eye-opening statistics:

  • Under-nutrition by the millions: As of 2022, about 149 million children under five worldwide are stunted (too short for their age due to chronic undernutrition) and 45 million are wasted (dangerously thin from acute undernutrition). Nearly half of all deaths in under-five children are linked to undernutrition – a sobering fact that mostly hits low-income countries.
  • Over-nutrition catching up: Meanwhile, 37 million children under five are overweight globally. And it’s not just kids – about 2.5 billion adults were overweight in 2022, including 890 million classified as obese. On the flip side, 390 million adults were underweight. Yes, you read that correctly: there are hundreds of millions of underweight people and billions overweight, all at the same time on the same planet.

This is the very definition of the double burden – stubborn undernutrition and soaring obesity co-existing worldwide. It’s as if the global community is on a see-saw where one side of malnutrition won’t budge without the other tipping over. To put it more bluntly, we live in a world where some people are dying because they can’t get enough food, while others are dying because they can’t stop eating unhealthy food. It’s a nutritional irony of our times.

Double trouble in India and other developing countries

The double burden is especially evident in countries undergoing rapid economic and lifestyle changes. Take India as a prime example – a country often highlighted in discussions of malnutrition. India has long battled high rates of undernutrition and despite progress, it still has staggering numbers of undernourished children. In fact, roughly one in every three malnourished children in the world lives in India. According to national surveys a few years back, about 38% of Indian children under 5 were stunted, 46% underweight and 16% wasted – contributing to India’s unfortunate distinction of having the largest number of malnourished kids globally.

But here comes the double burden twist: even as undernutrition persists, over-nutrition is rising in India. The same nation with widespread malnutrition is also seeing growing obesity, especially in adults. Recent data show that about 24% of Indian women (15–49 years) are overweight or obese. Urban areas in India are witnessing more cases of childhood obesity and diabetes, even as rural areas struggle with underweight children. Talk about an identity crisis – India’s nutritional profile ranges from severe calorie deficit to calorie surplus depending on where you look.

This pattern isn’t unique to India. Many developing countries – from parts of Africa to South-East Asia and Latin America – now deal with a “two-front war” on malnutrition. As economies grow and diets shift from traditional foods to processed, high-calorie foods, waistlines expand even among populations that still face poverty and micronutrient deficiencies. Health experts call this the nutrition transition, where lifestyles move from active, whole-food diets to sedentary lifestyles with processed foods. The result? Grandma might be undernourished, while her grandchild is overweight. Or an overweight, anaemic mother may give birth to an underweight baby – thus continuing a vicious cycle.

It’s a bit like a tale of two meals: one meal is too meagre to sustain a child and the very next meal is a sugary soda and chips contributing to obesity. Both are lacking the quality nutrition needed for health and both can occur in the same community. No wonder public health officials sometimes scratch their heads – and then roll up their sleeves to tackle both problems together.

Why does the double burden happen?

How on earth do we end up with malnutrition at both extremes? There are several underlying causes fueling this double burden and (warning) some are on the serious side – but we’ll try to explain in digestible bites:

  • Poverty and inequality: In many regions, economic growth has been uneven. So you get pockets of prosperity alongside extreme poverty. Wealthier (often urban) populations start consuming more high-fat, high-sugar foods and become less physically active – leading to weight gain. Meanwhile, poorer communities still struggle with undernutrition. It’s not unusual to find, say, an urban slum where a few residents can afford fast food (and become overweight) while their neighbours cannot afford enough food (and remain undernourished). Poverty also means limited access to diverse, healthy foods, driving both malnutrition and reliance on cheap junk calories.
  • Changing diets (Nutrition transition): Globally we are witnessing a shift from diets rich in fibre, fruits and vegetables to diets high in processed foods, oils, sweetened beverages and meats. These foods are often calorie-dense but nutrient-poor. They fill the stomach (and add weight) but don’t provide the vitamins or minerals a body needs. So someone might get overweight on a diet of white rice, fried snacks and sugary drinks, yet become deficient in iron or vitamin A. As one study noted, as countries develop economically, undernutrition tends to decrease – but obesity increases markedly at the same time. We’re basically swapping one problem (not enough food) for another (too much unhealthy food) unless nutrition education keeps up.
  • Urbanisation and lifestyle: City life often means less physical activity (desk jobs, anyone?), more stress and greater exposure to fast food outlets than fresh farm produce. The result is a recipe for weight gain. At the same time, rural areas might still lack access to sufficient food or healthcare. Also, urban poor might fill up on cheap street foods that are high in carbs/fats but low in nutrients, leading to a condition humorously dubbed “skinny-fat” – normal weight or overweight but malnourished in nutrients. It’s like being overfed and undernourished simultaneously.
  • Generational cycle: Here’s a less funny fact – an undernourished child can grow up with health problems that make them prone to obesity later. For instance, if a foetus doesn’t get enough nutrition (say the mother was undernourished during pregnancy), the child’s body might become super efficient at storing fat (a survival mechanism). Later in life, if that child eats a high-calorie diet, they might easily become overweight or develop heart disease. Meanwhile, women who become overweight (yet nutrient-deficient) can have complications in pregnancy and risk giving birth to babies who are underweight or have developmental issues. This intergenerational cycle means undernutrition and overnutrition can feed into each other across a family’s timeline.
  • Lack of nutrition education: Sometimes, people simply don’t know what eating right means – especially if they’ve transitioned from food scarcity to having more food available. It’s easy to equate “chubby child” with “healthy child” in some cultures, so diets heavy in fried foods or sweets might be seen as a sign of prosperity. Conversely, parents might not realise that an inexpensive local vegetable is more nutritious than an expensive packet of noodles. When education levels are low, even relatively well-off families can make poor nutrition choices, leading to obesity and micronutrient deficiencies. As one research finding intriguingly noted, even higher maternal education in India doesn’t always protect against the double burden – possibly because education is not translating into better nutrition knowledge or lifestyle (an educated working mom might have a sedentary job and rely on convenient processed foods). In short, knowing how to eat healthy is as important as having access to food.

So, the double burden is essentially malnutrition in stereo – one channel is poverty and lack of food, the other is dietary excess and poor quality food. The two can play simultaneously. The challenge is that tackling just one side (for example, just eliminating undernutrition) without guarding against the other (like unhealthy eating) can backfire. Countries that successfully reduced famine have seen spikes in obesity and diabetes if diets became too rich in sugars and fats. It’s like a see-saw that needs balancing – focusing only on undernutrition might accidentally tip the population into an obesity epidemic. The goal has to be finding the healthy middle ground – ensuring everyone gets enough and the right kind of food.

Impact on mothers and children: The 1-2 punch

The double burden of malnutrition hits hardest where vulnerability is already high – especially among mothers and children. This duo has a special place in nutrition discussions because a mother’s health directly affects her child’s, starting even before birth.

Mothers: Consider an expectant mother in a low-income community. If she’s undernourished (perhaps anaemic and underweight), her baby might be born underweight or premature, immediately at risk of growth and developmental problems. Now imagine another mother who is overweight but nutrient-deficient (yes, that’s possible – living on polished rice and maybe sugary tea, for instance). She might face gestational diabetes or hypertension and her baby could grow larger than normal in the womb or conversely also face malnutrition if the quality of her diet is poor. In both cases, the child’s future is impacted. In India, over 52% of pregnant women are anaemic (low in iron) – that’s a form of malnutrition that can cause fatigue, complications in childbirth and affect the baby’s growth. At the same time, rising obesity among women means more cases of diabetes and C-sections, which interestingly have been linked to higher odds of mother-child double malnutrition (one study found mothers with C-section births had higher risk of an undernourished child combined with maternal overweight). It’s a lose-lose situation we must turn into a win-win.

Children: Now zoom in on the kids, the most visibly affected by malnutrition. Undernourished children (stunted, wasted, etc.) face impaired immunity, frequent illnesses and struggles in school. They’re the kids who might be too tired to play or concentrate. Meanwhile, an overweight child (yes, those exist in poorer communities too, often due to cheap junk food) faces a different set of issues: risk of early onset diabetes, joint problems and social stigma. And here’s the kicker – these problems can be neighbours. It’s not uncommon in, say, an urban Indian slum or an African city, to see a skinny child and an overweight child in the same playground. Undernutrition in early life can also prime a child’s body to store fat more efficiently if food becomes abundant later – leading to adult obesity. It’s almost cruel: a child who survives undernutrition might later in life succumb to an obese-unhealthy lifestyle if diets aren’t improved. As the Smile Foundation team observes, “The children most affected by malnutrition are the ones whose mothers are themselves victims of ill health.” It’s a cycle of weak moms, weak babies and a weak future – unless we intervene decisively.

To paint a more optimistic picture: improving a mother’s nutrition is like a two-for-one deal – you get a healthier mom and a healthier child. That’s why many nutrition programmes (including Smile Foundation’s, which we’ll discuss next) focus on maternal and child nutrition together, often termed “MCH” in development jargon. It targets that critical 1000-day window from pregnancy to the child’s second birthday, where the right interventions can prevent both stunting and future obesity. In a way, ensuring balanced nutrition for women and kids is an antidote to the double burden: it prevents undernutrition early on and establishes healthy eating patterns that ward off overnutrition later.

Smile Foundation’s approach for Poshan Maah 2025: Tackling malnutrition from all angles

Enough about problems – let’s talk solutions! This is where organizations like Smile Foundation roll up their sleeves to combat malnutrition in all its forms. We have been actively addressing nutrition through a variety of programmes. And the secret sauce to our approach is integration – recognising that food quantity and food quality must go hand in hand.

Smile Foundation’s nutrition initiatives are linked with education, health and women’s empowerment, creating a holistic model. For instance, one of our nutrition campaigns, “Plate Half Full,” was designed to ensure children not only attend school but also receive a nutritious meal every day. After all, what good is schooling on an empty stomach? As Mr. Santanu Mishra, co-founder of Smile Foundation, aptly put it, “Plate Half Full is a programme designed to address the challenge of nutrition and education in young children. It comes with a promise of nutritious food along with regular school education, encouraging more kids to attend school in the lure of wholesome meals.

In other words, feeding children well is a strategy to both improve health and boost learning outcomes – a win-win that tackles undernutrition (by providing food) and helps prevent future overnutrition (by instilling healthy eating habits early).

But Smile’s work goes beyond just school meals. Here are some key ingredients in our recipe for fighting malnutrition:

  • Daily nutritious meals & health check-ups: Through our Mission Education centres, Smile Foundation provides underserved children with at least one wholesome meal every day and regular health camps every quarter. For kids like six-year-old Kiran in Maharashtra, India, this was life-changing. Kiran was visibly malnourished when she joined a Smile education centre – she was weak, undersized and so hungry that she had developed a habit of eating mud (yes, actual mud!) to fill her stomach. Her parents, daily-wage labourers, could barely afford one meal a day and Kiran’s health was failing. Once enrolled, she started receiving nutritious meals each day and basic medical care. The result? Over time, Kiran’s health improved, she became more active in class, and her attendance and learning ability shot up. Proper nutrition literally put the “smile” back in her childhood. Her story is not unique – thousands of children in Smile’s programmes show better growth and school performance once their bellies (and brains) are fed with the right nutrients.
  • Nutrition education for families: You can’t fix malnutrition by food aid alone; mindset and knowledge have to change too. Smile Foundation knows this, so we conduct regular awareness sessions for parents and communities about health, hygiene and balanced diets. Imagine interactive street plays and catchy songs in villages about washing hands and eating your greens – that’s how Smile engages people without scolding or boring them. We hold workshops for mothers on how to grow kitchen gardens and cook low-cost nutritious recipes. Many parents in marginalised communities simply never learned what a balanced meal is – they might fill a child’s stomach with plain rice or bread, not realising the child also needs proteins and vitamins. By teaching mothers that a little bit of dal (lentils) or a few leafy vegetables can make a huge difference, Smile Foundation empowers families to fight undernutrition and prevent diseases. One fun example: mothers are shown how to make “power porridge” or other local dishes more nutritious by adding ingredients like peanuts or moringa leaves. Such education ensures that even when resources are scarce, they’re used smartly to maximise nutrition. And critically, this education also warns about the pitfalls of junk food, so as communities become economically better, they hopefully won’t trade malnutrition-by-undernutrition for malnutrition-by-junk-food.
  • Community-based programmes and campaigns: Smile’s approach often involves the entire community. For example, we initiated “Cook for Smile” contests where top chefs and corporate leaders literally don an apron and cook healthy meals to raise awareness and funds. Involving celebrities and influencers like renowned Chef Vikas Khanna has added creative twists – Chef Khanna even developed a special nutritious laddoo (an Indian sweet) recipe for adolescent girls suffering from anemia. The laddoo, made of local ingredients like jaggery and sesame, was a big hit in Gujarat: over 15,000 of these iron-rich sweet balls were distributed to a thousand girls over 10 months, alongside iron supplements. More than 70% of those girls showed significant improvement in haemoglobin levels and BMI (a key indicator of healthy growth). Now that’s a sweet victory against malnutrition – literally!
  • Integrated health and nutrition camps: In tackling maternal and child malnutrition, Smile Foundation often complements government initiatives. For instance, through projects like Nutrition Enhancement in Punjab and “Pink Smile” in Uttar Pradesh, they set up mobile health camps to screen women and children for anaemia and malnutrition on the spot. These camps don’t just screen – they treat and educate. If a child is found underweight, they might get referred for medical care and the mother gets counselling on feeding practices. If a woman is found anaemic, she’ll receive iron supplements and a lesson in cooking iron-rich meals. In one district (Sangrur, Punjab), Smile Foundation helped establish community kitchen gardens and added iron supplements to school meals; within six months, anaemia rates among schoolchildren plunged from about 40.6% to just 2.7% – virtually eliminating anaemia in some schools. That’s the power of an integrated approach: combine government resources (like mid-day meals and health workers) with community engagement (gardens, nutrition classes) and you get dramatic results. It’s like hitting malnutrition with a one-two punch.
  • Focus on women and adolescent girls: Since mothers are key to breaking the malnutrition cycle, Smile runs targeted programmes under our women’s empowerment and health initiatives. We provide one-on-one counselling for expecting and new mothers on diet (what to eat when pregnant or breastfeeding), encourage exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months, and teach families about proper child feeding practices. In adolescent girls, who are future mothers, interventions like the laddoo project (called Project Sampoorna in Banaskantha, Gujarat) address anemia so that these girls don’t carry ill-health into motherhood Through peer education and school-based programmes, girls learn about nutrition, menstrual health and the importance of a balanced diet. The goal is to ensure that when these girls become women and have children, neither they nor their babies fall prey to undernutrition. It’s a preventative strike on the double burden: healthy girl today, healthy mother tomorrow, healthy baby the day after.

In summary, Smile Foundation’s work on nutrition is comprehensive, addressing immediate undernutrition while also promoting long-term healthy habits. They’re essentially performing “double-duty actions,” a term used by experts to describe interventions that address multiple forms of malnutrition at once. For example, feeding a child at school (addresses undernutrition) and educating that child about healthy foods (helps prevent obesity later) is a double-duty action. Distributing iron tablets (treats micronutrient deficiency) and teaching a community to grow spinach (provides sustainable source of iron) is another double-duty move. By complementing government schemes like the public food distribution, mid-day meals or the Anaemia Mukt Bharat (Aanemia-Free India) campaign with these community-driven efforts, Smile Foundation ensures that policies on paper translate to food on plates and knowledge in minds.

It’s not just about giving out food but about changing behaviour and systems. And sometimes, it’s about making nutrition fun – be it through a local recipe contest or a celebrity cook-off – so that people want to be a part of it. After all, fighting malnutrition is serious, but it doesn’t all have to be grim. A dash of humour or a community celebration can make people more receptive, whether it’s kids learning through a puppet show that vegetables are heroes or moms laughing in a workshop as they learn how to sneak pumpkin into parathas (flatbread) to up the vitamin A content.

Success stories: From Plates Half Empty to Plates Half Full

No article on this topic would be complete without a few inspiring stories of change. We’ve already met Kiran, the little girl who went from eating mud to enjoying hearty school meals and thriving. But there are many Kirans and countless more subtle transformations happening every day through sustained efforts.

Take the case of a village in Banaskantha, Gujarat, where adolescent girls used to commonly faint in school due to anaemia. Before Smile Foundation intervened, a whopping 78% of girls aged 14–19 were anaemic in that region (far above the national average). These girls started receiving the special laddoos, nutrition classes and supplements. One of the beneficiaries, let’s call her Rekha, shared in a community meeting that earlier she felt tired just walking to school, but after a few months on the programme, she could concentrate in class and even convinced her mother to cook the family’s lentil soup with the greens from their kitchen garden – a habit they learned in the programme. Over 70% of the girls improved their health status and they carried those lessons home, turning it into a family and community improvement.

Or consider Sangrur, Punjab, where the Nutrition Enhancement Programme mentioned earlier turned things around dramatically in 23 villages. Here, a school principal noticed that ever since the kitchen garden produce (like spinach and fenugreek) started appearing in school lunches and children were taking iron syrup mixed in meals, absenteeism dropped. Kids weren’t falling sick as often. One mother commented (half in jest) that her son used to hate green veggies but once he learned in the school sessions that “Popeye was strong because of spinach,” he started eating it thinking he’ll get muscles! It may sound funny, but such creative education made kids eat better, which made them healthier. In just six months, anaemia in some schools nearly vanished. It’s almost like a magic trick but backed by very real science and a lot of hard work on the ground.

In Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, the “Pink Smile” project (in partnership with a corporate donor) set up regular health camps in 10 villages. A local health worker, Sunita, recounts how they discovered dozens of women with moderate anaemia who had never been diagnosed. “They just thought it’s normal to feel dizzy and look pale,” Sunita said. After enrolment in Pink Smile, these women got treatment and learned simple diet tweaks (like adding a handful of leafy greens to their daily curry). A few months later, many of these women reported higher energy levels. One woman even said she finally had the strength to start a small tailoring business from home now that she wasn’t constantly fatigued. Empowerment can start with something as basic as not being anaemic.

Battling malnutrition is about enabling people to live their lives to the fullest. A well-nourished child can focus in class, play and dream of a better future. A well-nourished teenager can pursue skills and opportunities instead of being held back by illness. A well-nourished mother can earn, care and contribute to her family without the drag of constant weakness. In short, nutrition is the foundation upon which individuals and communities build better lives.

Poshan Maah 2025: From double burden to double victory

Addressing the double burden of malnutrition may sound like chasing two rabbits at once. But the truth is, the solutions for undernutrition and overnutrition are two sides of the same coin: ensure everyone has access to balanced, nutritious food and the knowledge to choose healthy lifestyles. It’s not as out-of-reach as it seems, especially with the spirit of Poshan Maah 2025 around. Here are a few broad strokes of what’s needed (and happening) to turn this double burden into an opportunity for double victory:

  • “Double-Duty” policies: Governments and organisations are increasingly adopting double-duty actions, meaning strategies that tackle both ends of malnutrition simultaneously. For example, fortifying staple foods with vitamins (like adding iron to flour or vitamin A to cooking oil) can help undernourished populations and ensure those who eat a lot of these staples don’t become micronutrient deficient. School meal programmes now often emphasise not just giving calories but giving diverse food (protein, veggies, etc.) to prevent undernutrition and obesity. Nutrition programmes are aligning with agriculture to promote crops that are climate-resilient and nutrient-rich, so communities don’t resort to just rice or wheat but have millets, legumes, fruits, etc. readily available. The idea is to end undernutrition without inviting obesity – growth without the growing pains.
  • Education and behaviour change: Perhaps the most powerful tool is knowledge. When a community understands nutrition – truly grasps why a carrot is better than a candy – they become active participants in their health. This is where Smile Foundation’s model can be replicated and scaled. Imagine every village having a nutrition champion or every school including basic nutrition in the curriculum. It sounds mundane, but these are lifelong lessons. Kids who learn to snack on fruit instead of fried chips carry that habit into adulthood and to their own kids. Many countries are now running public health campaigns about the dangers of sugary drinks and ultra-processed foods (some with humorous jingles because who doesn’t remember a funny ad?). Empowered consumers will demand healthier options and make better choices cutting off malnutrition at both ends.
  • Strengthening health systems: Early detection is key. A child shouldn’t have to become severely wasted or an adolescent morbidly obese before action is taken. Training health workers to monitor growth, check for anaemia, counsel on diet – all these make the healthcare system a frontline fighter against malnutrition. Initiatives like India’s Poshan Abhiyaan (National Nutrition Mission) are using technology (smartphone apps for health workers) to track every child’s nutrition status. If something is off, interventions kick in sooner. It’s much easier to course-correct early – give a malnourished toddler supplemental food before stunting becomes irreversible or advise an overweight teen before they develop diabetes. Health systems also need to treat malnutrition in all its forms as part of routine care (e.g., diabetes clinics that also screen for undernutrition and vice versa). A holistic approach means whether someone comes to a clinic for weight loss or weight gain, they get guided towards balance.
  • Community engagement and empowerment: As the Smile Foundation experience shows, involving the community creates lasting change. Women’s self-help groups learning about nutrition, youth clubs doing healthy cooking competitions, local leaders being nutrition advocates – these social approaches make good nutrition a community value. In places where malnutrition was once accepted as “fate” or simply not noticed, community-led monitoring can spur action. For example, villagers in some areas have started their own nutrition kitchens or co-ops to ensure everyone gets at least one nutritious meal. When communities are empowered, they also hold governments accountable ensuring food programs are delivered, demanding clean water and sanitation (which are critical to prevent disease-related undernutrition) and so on. Think of it as crowd-sourcing good health.
  • A touch of innovation: The fight against malnutrition is also getting innovative. From bio-fortified crops (like zinc-enriched wheat) to mobile apps that teach mothers recipes, the arsenal is growing. Even the humour and creativity seen in campaigns like cartoons explaining the food plate or the use of local comedians to spread messages are forms of innovation. Chef Vikas Khanna’s healthy laddoo is a small innovation that paid off big. There are also policy innovations like taxes on sugary drinks (to reduce consumption) and subsidies on fruits and veggies (to encourage healthy eating). Each context will require a tailored mix of these innovations, but the encouraging part is that we humans are quite resourceful when we recognise a problem and malnutrition in all its forms is finally being recognised as a problem that every country must address.

In closing, it’s worth reminding ourselves why all this matters. Combating the double burden of malnutrition isn’t just a numbers game or a box to tick for the Sustainable Development Goals. It’s about people – the child who can grow tall and smart because she got the right nutrition, the mother who survives childbirth and raises a healthy family because she overcame anaemia, the community that thrives because its members are strong and productive, not held back by illness. There’s a saying that “a healthy mind in a healthy body” is the key to a happy life. We need to create conditions for both minds and bodies to be healthy which means ending undernutrition and promoting healthy eating.

The double burden of malnutrition might seem like a daunting double villain. But with integrated efforts, it can be defeated with a double dose of common sense and compassion. One part is ensuring food security – no one should go to bed hungry or wake up unsure of their next meal. The other is ensuring nutrition security – that people’s diets actually contain the nutrients needed for a healthy life, not just any calories. Organisations like Smile Foundation exemplify this dual approach by filling plates and educating palates at the same time. As we often emphasise, food is a basic necessity and proper nutrition is a fundamental right. When we help fulfil that right, we’re not only saving lives – we’re also adding joy and productivity to those lives, empowering the next generation and building a healthier nation and world.

So, whether you’re a policymaker, a donor, a health professional or a concerned member of the general public, remember that solving malnutrition is everyone’s cup of (fortified) tea. It can be as simple as supporting a school meal programme, spreading the word about healthy eating or contributing to NGOs like Smile Foundation that are on the frontlines. The burden may be double, but so can be our resolve. With a bit of teamwork – and perhaps a healthy laddoo in hand – we can ensure every child and adult has the right kind of weight on their shoulders (like the weight of a schoolbag or a bright future) and not the weight of malnutrition. And that outcome would truly be something to smile about.

Where Poshan Maah 2025 fits in

Every September, India observes Poshan Maah – a campaign to improve nutrition awareness, promote healthy practices and encourage community action. Poshan Maah 2025 is particularly relevant because it stresses convergence: linking food security, health, sanitation and education to fight malnutrition in all its forms. That aligns perfectly with Smile Foundation’s approach. Whether through daily meals at Mission Education centres, kitchen gardens for families or anaemia screening for adolescent girls, Smile’s interventions are real-life examples of how awareness plus action can turn the tide against both undernutrition and obesity.

So, while Poshan Maah provides the annual rallying cry, organizations like us ensure the momentum carries on all year. Together, they help India tackle malnutrition not just in headlines, but in households.

Sources:

Categories
Smile

Redefining The Role of Men for Social Impact

The missing half of the equation

When we think of social impact, our minds often jump to women leading change, mothers securing nutrition for their children or girls breaking cycles of poverty through education. Rightly so — women’s empowerment has been at the centre of development agendas for decades.

But lasting social change cannot be achieved without men. Whether as fathers, brothers, community leaders or frontline health workers, men shape family decisions, community norms and resource flows. But their role in caregiving, public health or education is often minimised or absent from programme design.

Smile Foundation’s two decades of grassroots work reveal a pattern: when men are engaged — not as gatekeepers but as partners — families thrive, women flourish and children’s futures brighten.

Why men’s role matters in social impact

Globally, research is clear. Men’s active participation in caregiving and community development benefits everyone.

  • For women: It reduces the double burden of income generation and caregiving, freeing women to pursue education and work.
  • For children: Fathers’ engagement improves cognitive development, school performance and emotional resilience.
  • For men themselves: Involvement in caregiving has been linked to better mental health, stronger family bonds and even healthier lifestyle choices.

And yet, stereotypes persist: men are the “breadwinners,” women are the “caregivers.” Programmes often reinforce these divides. The result is that a large section of potential change-makers remain underutilised.

Breaking the stereotype: Men for social impact

1. In Education: Fathers as Allies

In Smile Foundation’s Mission Education centres, teachers often encounter fathers sceptical about sending their daughters to school. But when engaged through community mobilisation sessions, fathers become some of the strongest advocates for girls’ education.

In Uttar Pradesh, a father who once insisted his daughter would only study till Grade 5 now proudly attends her science exhibitions. This narrative shift — from resistance to advocacy — is a reminder: when fathers believe, girls achieve.

2. In Health: Men as champions of preventive care

Smile Foundation’s Smile on Wheels and E-Arogya Clinics show another dimension: men’s participation in preventive healthcare.

During awareness drives on immunisation or maternal health, it was often men who decided whether a mother would visit a health camp. When fathers understood the benefits, vaccination rates improved. ASHAs and Smile’s health workers learned to engage men directly — through village meetings, evening film screenings or even door-to-door conversations timed when fathers were home.

The results were striking with more antenatal check-ups, fewer dropouts in immunisation and growing acceptance of concepts like nutrition for girls.

3. In Livelihoods: From sole providers to shared planners

Smile’s livelihood and vocational training programmes traditionally targeted women and youth. But a parallel effect emerged: when men saw women contributing to household income, household decision-making became more balanced.

Couple-based livelihood counselling sessions showed that men who planned budgets jointly with their wives also reported higher savings and lower debt. In communities across Assam and Rajasthan, men began to say: “We don’t just earn; we plan together.”

Barriers to men’s participation

Despite the promise, barriers remain — many tied to deep social norms:

  • Perception of masculinity: Care is still seen as “women’s work.” Men helping with household chores are often mocked.
  • Breadwinner pressure: In low-income communities, men feel their only valid contribution is income.
  • Lack of programmes for men: Development programmes often design interventions around women and children, assuming men are secondary.

These realities mean men often feel excluded from or resistant to, social programmes.

What works: Three pathways to engage men for social impact

Drawing from Smile Foundation’s fieldwork — and aligned with global evidence — three approaches stand out.

1. Design with men in mind

Skill-building for caregiving, health awareness or parenting is rarely targeted at men. When Smile piloted father-inclusive sessions in its education centres, men reported higher confidence in supporting their children’s schooling.

Takeaway: Men don’t resist involvement; they resist feeling incompetent. Structured training helps.

2. Reduce the breadwinner–caregiver conflict

Men in low-income households juggle long hours of labour. Smile’s evening or weekend community sessions — from health talks to parent–teacher meetings — increased male participation by 40%.

Takeaway: Programmes that respect men’s economic constraints are far more effective.

3. Build Peer Support and Social Acceptance

Men learn from men. When Smile mobilised male volunteers to champion nutrition drives, their voices carried weight in convincing other fathers. Peer networks also reduced ridicule for “breaking norms.”

Takeaway: Role models and peer validation are crucial in changing norms.

Men as Partners, Not Bystanders

Over time, Smile Foundation’s own messaging has evolved:

  • Then: Campaigns focused primarily on women and children as beneficiaries.
  • Now: Men are shown as allies — fathers walking daughters to school, husbands supporting maternal care, youth participating in community health campaigns.

This narrative shift is subtle but powerful. It reframes men not as obstacles, but as co-creators of impact.

From SDGs to local action

Engaging men is not just a local experiment — it aligns with global development priorities:

  • SDG 3: Good health and well-being, by involving men in preventive healthcare.
  • SDG 4: Quality education, by ensuring fathers support schooling, especially for girls.
  • SDG 5: Gender equality, by sharing caregiving roles and reducing violence.

Smile Foundation’s grassroots approach shows how these global frameworks translate into community-level action.

The fun but serious side: Why men benefit too

Let’s not forget — men gain immensely when they engage in social impact. Fathers who help with homework report better bonds with their children. Husbands who attend maternal health sessions with their wives feel more confident and respected. Even young men volunteering in Smile programs say they develop leadership skills that help in jobs.

In short: a more caring man is often a healthier, happier man.

Towards a shared future

If women have been the face of social change, men must now be the backbone. The future of social impact lies not in dividing roles, but in sharing them.

Smile Foundation’s journey proves this: from classrooms to clinics, when men are engaged, the outcomes multiply. Families grow stronger. Children dream bigger. Communities move forward faster.

The next big narrative in development may just be this: social change is not women’s work alone. It is everyone’s responsibility — and men have a central role to play.

Categories
Smile

How Smile Foundation’s Narrative Has Evolved Over Two Decades

Why Narratives Matter in Development

Every organisation has a story. But for non-profits, that story is not just about identity — it shapes impact, funding and public trust.

When Smile Foundation was established in 2002, India’s development sector was still framed in a language of charity. Campaigns featured images of malnourished children, appeals to “help the needy” and stories that positioned donors as rescuers.

Two decades later, Smile Foundation’s communication looks dramatically different. Today, the organisation speaks in the language of system strengthening, empowerment and partnerships. Children are framed as learners and future leaders, women as agents of change and frontline workers as pillars of India’s health and education systems.

This evolution in narrative is not cosmetic — it reflects deeper changes in India’s development sector, global priorities like the SDGs and Smile Foundation’s own growth as a professional, impact-driven institution.

The early years: A charity lens

At its inception, Smile Foundation’s work was heartfelt and immediate: enrolling children in schools, organising medical camps in underserved areas and providing relief during natural disasters.

The language of its campaigns reflected that era. Mission Education, Smile’s flagship programme, initially communicated in simple terms: “Help a child go to school.” Visuals showed children holding books or sitting in classrooms, the message being that donors could directly “give” them a future.

Healthcare too was narrated in numbers treated — the success of medical camps was reported by tallying how many patients received consultations or medicines.

This was effective in mobilising early support, but it carried a limitation: it cast communities as recipients of aid rather than participants in change.

The first shift: From pity to participation

By the mid-2000s, Smile Foundation began noticing the gaps in this approach. A child might be enrolled in school, but if her mother fell ill or the family needed her to work, she would drop out. A patient might receive medicine at a camp, but without follow-up care, the illness returned.

Smile realised that sustainable change required participation, not just pity.

The narrative began to shift:

  • Children were no longer depicted as helpless, but as eager learners with potential.
  • Mothers appeared not only as caregivers but as advocates for their children’s education.
  • Donors were framed as partners in progress, not just benefactors.

Case study: Smile Twin e-Learning Programme (STeP)

This vocational training initiative epitomised the narrative change. Instead of charity for unemployed youth, the story became one of opportunity and agency. Communication stressed that training in retail, IT and soft skills could help youth “step” into jobs and independence.

The tone shifted from “help them survive” to “equip them to thrive.”

Education: From sponsorship to systemic change

Smile Foundation’s Mission Education grew into one of India’s largest non-formal education initiatives, reaching thousands of children across urban slums and remote villages.

As the Right to Education Act (2009) reframed schooling as a right, not a privilege, Smile adapted its communication accordingly.

  • Then: “Sponsor a child’s education.”
  • Now: “Education is every child’s right — together, we can make it real.”

Case study: Shiksha Na Ruke

During the COVID-19 pandemic, when millions of children were at risk of dropping out, Smile launched Shiksha Na Ruke (Let Education Not Stop).

This campaign captured the essence of Smile’s evolved narrative. It was no longer about children in need but about a systemic crisis in continuity of learning. Smile’s solution — digital classrooms, community learning pods, parental engagement — positioned the organisation as a problem-solver at scale, not just a service provider.

Healthcare: From camps to systems strengthening

Health has been one of the most visible areas of Smile’s narrative change.

In the 2000s, healthcare meant temporary medical camps. Impact was measured by “patients seen” and “medicines distributed.”

With the launch of Smile on Wheels, mobile healthcare vans, the story expanded. Now, Smile spoke of last-mile healthcare access, taking doctors and diagnostics to where none existed.

By the 2020s, Smile’s healthcare narrative had matured into system strengthening:

  • E-Arogya Clinics integrated technology and medicine vending machines for sustainable delivery.
  • Campaigns emphasised preventive care, not just treatment.
  • ASHA workers were highlighted as partners, not just local assistants.

Case Study: Health Cannot Wait (COVID-19 Response)

This campaign reflected Smile’s evolved language. Instead of “we are distributing relief,” the message was: “We are ensuring system readiness and resilience for future crises.”

The focus was on preventive healthcare, capacity building and partnerships with frontline workers — aligning Smile with global public health priorities.

Women’s empowerment: From beneficiaries to leaders

In the early years, women appeared in Smile’s campaigns primarily as mothers — feeding children, attending health check-ups, receiving nutrition kits.

By the late 2010s, Smile’s gender narrative had transformed. Women were now leaders, earners and decision-makers.

Case study: Swabhiman

Initially a programme for reproductive health and nutrition, Swabhiman evolved into a holistic women’s empowerment platform.

Communication began highlighting:

  • Women leading self-help groups
  • Adolescent girls completing education
  • Mothers running small businesses

The storytelling shifted from “help women” to “invest in women.” This aligned Smile with the global development community’s push to frame gender equality as smart economics.

Disaster Response: From relief to resilience

Smile has responded to nearly every major disaster in India over the last two decades — earthquakes, floods, cyclones.

  • Early years: Stories focused on immediate relief — rations, clothes, medicines.
  • Later years: The emphasis shifted to resilience and recovery — rebuilding schools, psychosocial support, safe spaces for women and children.

Case study: Kerala floods (2018)

Instead of reporting “tons of food distributed,” Smile’s communication highlighted restoring schools, setting up safe spaces and enabling communities to recover stronger.

This reframing mirrored global frameworks like the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, which stresses long-term resilience over short-term relief.

CSR partnerships: From Donor appeals to co-Investment

The Companies Act, 2013, mandating CSR, forced NGOs to professionalise communication. Corporates wanted ROI, impact metrics and scalable models.

Smile adapted swiftly:

  • Reports highlighted learning outcomes, nutrition indicators and cost-effectiveness.
  • Campaigns spoke of “partnerships for nation-building,” not “donations.”

Case Studies:

  • PepsiCo Nutrition Enhancement Programme: Reached 60,000+ beneficiaries with kitchen gardens, health camps and worker training.
  • Mars Wrigley & Smile: Improved Anganwadi infrastructure in Maharashtra with solar lighting, toilets and water filters.
  • Microsoft Digital Classrooms: Framed as pilots for scalable ed-tech models, aligning with CSR interest in innovation.

This pivot ensured Smile remained relevant to CSR boards and corporate philanthropy.

Storytelling platforms: The medium is the message

Smile’s communication has also mirrored broader media shifts:

  • 2000s: Posters, donation appeals, newsletters.
  • 2010s: Short films, donor reports, case study booklets.
  • 2020s: LinkedIn carousels, infographics, blogs with policy-angled storytelling.

Today, Smile speaks to multiple audiences simultaneously:

  • General public: Through human-centered stories of children and women.
  • CSR leaders and policymakers: Through data, policy alignment and SDG framing.

Today’s narrative: System strengthening

Three elements define Smile Foundation’s present-day storytelling:

  1. Agency over pity: Communities are portrayed as capable agents of change.
  2. Systems over charity: Focus on continuity in education, healthcare resilience and women’s leadership.
  3. Partnerships over giving: Corporates, governments and individuals are invited to co-create solutions.

The next frontier: Dignity and advocacy

If the early 2000s were about need, and the 2010s about empowerment, the 2020s are about dignity.

The future of Smile’s narrative will likely emphasise:

  • System strengthening at scale: Training frontline workers, upgrading infrastructure, building resilient institutions.
  • Intersectionality: Connecting health, education, climate and livelihoods.
  • Digital storytelling: Data dashboards, interactive case studies, podcasts.
  • Policy advocacy: Moving beyond service delivery to shaping policy conversations in health, education and gender.

A story still being written

From charity appeals in the early 2000s to system-strengthening partnerships today, Smile Foundation’s narrative evolution mirrors India’s own development journey.

The heart of the story remains the same: a belief that every child, every woman and every frontline worker deserves not just survival but dignity, opportunity and the chance to thrive.

But the telling of that story has matured. It now reflects confidence, scale and a systems approach — positioning Smile Foundation not only as a service provider but as a strategic partner in nation-building.

And perhaps the biggest lesson is this: when narratives evolve, so does impact. A story well told is not just communication. It is transformation.

Categories
Education

The ABCs of Opportunity: Getting FLN Right

A curious thing happens when you walk into a rural classroom in India. You’ll see rows of children, bright-eyed, uniformed, ready to learn. The blackboard carries a neat lesson in English or Hindi. But if you flip open a child’s notebook and ask them to read a short sentence — something as simple as “The sun rises in the east” — many cannot. If you ask them to subtract 37 from 52, most will stumble.

This is not because the children are less capable, less ambitious or less curious. It’s because the foundation — the bedrock of learning itself — was never laid properly.

Welcome to the world of FLN: Foundational Literacy and Numeracy.

What FLN really means

Think of FLN as the educational equivalent of learning to walk. Before you run, before you dance, before you climb mountains — you need to take those first steps. Reading simple texts and doing basic arithmetic by the age of 10 is not just a milestone. It’s a life-defining skill. Without it, children fall into what the World Bank and UNICEF call “learning poverty”: the inability to read and understand a basic story by the end of primary school. Globally, 7 in 10 children in low- and middle-income countries face this challenge.

In India, the numbers are starker. According to ASER 2022, only 20.5% of Grade 3 students in rural India could read a Grade 2-level text and just 25.9% could do basic subtraction. Imagine trying to study science, history or even computer coding without this base. It’s like trying to build a skyscraper on sand.

Why should anyone care?

Because FLN is a growth, a health and even a democracy story — all put together.

  • The economic angle: Countries that improve literacy rates see GDP boosts. Every child who can read and count contributes to a more productive workforce. The World Bank estimates that every dollar invested in early education yields up to $14 in returns.
  • The social angle: Literate citizens participate more in civic life, understand their rights and engage better in communities.
  • The personal angle: For a child, being able to read independently sparks confidence and curiosity. That confidence compounds over a lifetime — affecting jobs, health, even how they raise their own children.

FLN, in other words, is not a “nice to have.” It is the difference between a nation of potential and a nation of missed chances.

India’s policy push — and its gaps

The good news: policymakers are aware. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the NIPUN Bharat Mission set a bold target —universal FLN by 2026-27. But a mission statement doesn’t teach a child to read.

India’s Achilles heel has always been implementation. Classrooms remain overcrowded, teachers undertrained and children first-generation learners without support at home. Add linguistic diversity — over 120 major languages — and the challenge becomes even more complex.

What works: Lessons from the field

Globally, there are bright spots:

  • Kenya’s Tusome programme deployed structured lesson plans, teacher coaching and continuous assessments. Within two years, students doubled their reading fluency.
  • Ghana’s Mother Tongue initiative proved that children learn faster when taught first in their home language before transitioning to English.

India has its own promising examples too — Smile Foundation’s Mission Education programme being one. Operating across 2,000 villages in 26 states, it reimagines the classroom by:

  • Grouping children by skill, not age or grade.
  • Training teachers in multilingual classrooms and hands-on methods.
  • Introducing technology like tablets and smart boards to make lessons interactive.
  • Involving parents so learning doesn’t stop at school gates.

One teacher from rural Odisha shared that when children were grouped by skill instead of grade, “the weakest child no longer felt left behind, and the strongest was no longer bored.” That small shift unlocked confidence for the whole class.

The missing middle: Teachers and parents

Any education reform is only as strong as the people delivering it. In India, teachers often juggle 40-60 students per class, many with varying abilities. Without training in differentiated instruction, they default to “teach to the average” — which means half the class is lost.

Equally, parents — many of whom are illiterate — feel unable to support homework. Yet, evidence shows that when parents read aloud at home, even for 10 minutes, literacy outcomes improve dramatically. Involving parents through workshops and simple activities is a low-cost, high-impact intervention India has underused.

The tech temptation — and its limits for literacy

Post-pandemic, edtech boomed. Tablets, apps and AI tutors promised to close the gap. But the catch is that technology is a tool, not a silver bullet. A tablet in the hands of a disengaged teacher changes little. What works is a blended model — community-based teaching reinforced by tech-enabled personalised learning. Think small-group storytelling circles in the village, backed by apps that track progress.

Why K-3 is where the action is

By Class 3, a child who hasn’t mastered FLN is four times more likely to drop out later. The early years matter because brains are most plastic then — absorbing language and numeracy at lightning speed. Prioritising K-3 means focusing resources where returns are highest. It also means resisting the temptation to overload children with content. A 7-year-old doesn’t need trigonometry — they need fluency in subtraction and the joy of reading.

The Triple Dividend of investing in FLN

Investing in FLN pays off three times over.

  1. Immediate gains: More children can learn effectively in higher grades.
  2. Economic gains: A literate workforce fuels innovation, jobs and GDP.
  3. Social Gains: Educated citizens strengthen democracy and health outcomes.

In fact, studies show early literacy improves public health because people understand prescriptions, nutrition labels and hygiene practices better.

So where do we go from here? India needs a coordinated, multi-pronged strategy:

  • Empower teachers: Continuous in-service training, peer mentoring and recognition to make teaching aspirational again.
  • Flexible models: Mix community centres, anganwadis and schools with mobile learning vans for hard-to-reach areas.
  • Language first: Prioritise mother-tongue instruction in early years before transitioning to English or Hindi.
  • Family engagement: Structured parent workshops that turn homes into mini-classrooms.
  • Accountability: Use simple assessments to track progress district by district and feed results back into policy.

This isn’t about reinventing the wheel. The building blocks exist. What’s needed is scale, speed and sustained political will.

Why it matters to you and me

You might be reading this on a smartphone during your commute. You probably don’t think twice about reading an email, scanning a menu or calculating a discount. That invisible skill — literacy — shapes every decision you make. Now imagine living without it.

For millions of Indian children, that’s reality. And unless we act, it will define their future — and India’s.

Don’t get lost

Education reforms often get lost in jargon. But FLN is refreshingly simple. Teach every child to read and count by the age of 10. Do that, and we set them up not just for school, but for life. Fail, and we condemn them to struggle before they’ve even begun.

The stakes are enormous, but so is the opportunity. In a country young, restless and ambitious, there may be no higher national priority than ensuring that every child can master the ABCs of opportunity.

Categories
Education

Why STEM Might Just Be the Best Superpower We Can Give to Kids

A few months ago, I watched a group of middle-school girls in rural Uttar Pradesh lean over a 3D printer as if it were a magic box. Out came a tiny plastic solar lamp, layer by layer, while they whispered and giggled as though they had just pulled off a science trick that could light up their whole world. In many ways, they had.

That moment captures why I’m obsessed with STEM education. Not because robotics or 3D printers are cool toys (though they are), but because they’re keys — keys to unlocking curiosity, envious careers and lovely confidence in children who may otherwise never imagine themselves as scientists, engineers or creators.

India, like many countries, sits at the cusp of a fascinating experiment — Can technology and STEM learning be democratised so that children in the most underserved schools and communities have the same opportunities as kids in elite institutions? Smile Foundation seems to think so — and they’ve been putting that belief on the road, quite literally.

Why STEM and why now?

STEM — Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics — has become one of those acronyms that makes policymakers nod vigorously. But beneath the jargon is a simple truth: the future is STEM-shaped.

From climate change solutions to healthcare innovations to digital jobs we haven’t yet imagined, the next generation of problem-solvers will need a toolkit rooted in science and technology. The National Education Policy 2020 in India recognised this, pushing for hands-on, inquiry-driven learning. What this means in practice is kids won’t just memorise Newton’s laws but they should build a catapult, measure the angle and argue about whether Newton would’ve liked Angry Birds.

The challenge? Access.

Most rural or low-income schools lack science labs, let alone robotics kits. Teachers are undertrained, under-resourced and often overwhelmed. Girls face cultural barriers and communities may not see immediate “value” in letting children tinker instead of cramming for exams. That’s where initiatives like Smile Foundation’s STEM programmes step in.

The Big Idea: Make STEM impossible to ignore

What I like about Smile’s approach is that it’s not trying to sprinkle STEM on top of existing curricula like confetti. It’s trying to embed curiosity as a way of life.

Here’s how:

  • STEM labs: Schools get physical spaces where science isn’t theoretical. Think robotics kits, DIY science projects, even IoT workshops. Smile rolled out labs with consumables and reusables, so experiments don’t end after one class.
  • Teacher training: Because a STEM lab without trained teachers is like a plane without a pilot. Teachers learn not just how to use equipment but how to weave STEM into everyday lessons.
  • Science & innovation clubs: Students form groups to build models, brainstorm and even enter challenges. It’s like a mini incubator for ideas.
  • Annual Science Fairs & innovation challenges: Kids get to showcase their projects and nothing builds confidence like explaining your robot to a hall full of parents and peers.
  • STEM-on-Wheels: My personal favorite. Mobile vans and buses equipped with labs visit underserved schools and communities. Imagine a traveling carnival, but instead of cotton candy, you get coding lessons and microscopes.

What does this look like on the ground?

Smile runs two kinds of delivery models: High Reach (lots of schools, less time with each) and High Impact (fewer schools, deeper engagement). In practical terms:

  • High Reach: A facilitator might serve 5 schools and 10 communities, reaching 2,000 kids a year, giving each child about 30 hours of STEM engagement.
  • High Impact: A facilitator might work daily in one school and two communities, reaching 400 children but offering up to 100 hours of STEM work per year.

This dual approach is clever. Some kids get broad exposure; others get deep immersion. Both matter — because you never know whether the spark of curiosity will ignite after 3 experiments or 30.

Special sauce: STEM for girls

Here’s where the story gets even more interesting. Smile runs STEM-Nayika, a programme designed especially for girls. It’s aligned with NEP and structured in three tiers (Ramanujan, Sarabhai, Kalam) to guide girls from curiosity to confident problem-solving.

Girls in India are still less likely to pursue STEM careers due to stereotypes, lack of role models and limited exposure. A programme that gives them labs, clubs, mentors and a safe environment to experiment is quietly revolutionary.

One girl I met at a workshop told me she had always thought “science was for boys.” After building her own solar-powered fan, she smiled (pun intended) and said, “Now I think science is for me.”

Taking STEM on the road

The concept of STEM-on-Wheels deserves its own section because it’s delightfully inventive. A bus, van or even bike can be outfitted with DIY kits, models and digital tools. They roll into schools or communities that may never otherwise see a lab.

This matters because access isn’t just about money — it’s also about geography. In many rural regions, even if a school has a lab, it may be locked up, underutilised or missing basic supplies. Mobile labs make STEM feel like an event. Kids run to them, parents peek in curiously and suddenly the entire community sees science not as abstract but as fun and tangible.

It’s also symbolic. Science is literally arriving at your doorstep.

But does it work?

The numbers are promising. Depending on the model, a single facilitator or vehicle can reach 1500 to 4000 kids a year. Students get between 15 and 100 hours of hands-on STEM exposure annually — a massive leap from zero.

Teachers, too, benefit. By gaining professional development and tools, they’re more likely to integrate STEM into their regular classrooms, creating a multiplier effect beyond Smile’s direct reach.

And then there’s the intangibles:

  • Kids who once dreaded science start forming science clubs.
  • Communities that saw education only as exam prep start valuing creativity.
  • Girls who thought careers in tech were impossible begin to imagine themselves as engineers.

STEM as social equity

It’s worth stepping back to see the bigger picture. In a country as large and diverse as India, education isn’t just about preparing workers. It’s about shaping citizens.

STEM education teaches problem-solving, collaboration and resilience — skills that help not just in jobs but in life. When a child learns to debug a code or fix a circuit, they’re also learning persistence and critical thinking.

And because STEM is inherently about solving problems, embedding it in underserved communities is particularly powerful. Imagine if the next big water filter innovation comes not from a university lab, but from a village girl who grew up tinkering with Smile’s DIY kits.

The fun part: STEM is Play

One thing I’ve noticed at these programmes is how much kids laugh. STEM education done right looks less like a classroom and more like a playground.

Robotics workshops feel like toy-building. Science fairs feel like festivals. Even teacher training sometimes resembles improv sessions, with educators trying out coding games or balancing structures made of straws.

This playfulness is not accidental. It’s central. Children learn best when curiosity feels like joy, not obligation. And in communities where education has historically been framed as rote memorisation, introducing joy into learning may be the most radical innovation of all.

What India can teach the world

Other countries are experimenting with STEM, too, but India’s scale makes its experiments fascinating. Few places attempt to bring hands-on science to millions of children across both rural and urban areas.

  • In Kenya, mobile science labs are being trialed, but at a fraction of India’s scale.
  • In the U.S., makerspaces and STEM clubs are common, but often limited to privileged schools.
  • In China, there’s massive investment in AI and coding education, but less focus on equity across rural areas.

India’s STEM-on-Wheels and STEM-Nayika models are unusual in their attempt to marry innovation with inclusion. This could well become a blueprint for other developing countries.

Of course, challenges remain. Equipment can break. Teachers can burn out. Programmes need sustainable funding. And scaling without losing quality is always tricky.

But if there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that kids don’t wait for perfect conditions. Hand them a tinkering kit and they’ll build something anyway.

The task for policymakers, NGOs and corporates is to keep fueling this momentum. More partnerships with schools. More investments in STEM labs. More champions for girls. And yes, more buses, vans and bikes carrying science across dusty roads.

The world is full of problems. Climate change, public health, energy, inequality. But the solutions will come from minds that have been trained to ask, “What if?” and “Why not?”

Every time I see a girl in a village hold up a solar lamp she built herself, I think: here’s someone who might grow up to invent the next sustainable energy breakthrough. Or maybe she won’t — maybe she’ll just gain the confidence to negotiate better wages or start her own business. Either way, that’s empowerment.

And that’s why STEM matters. Not just for jobs, not just for exams, but for unlocking potential.

So if you ever see a bus painted with science diagrams rolling through a village, don’t be surprised if it’s carrying more than microscopes and robots. It might be carrying the next generation of problem-solvers — and a brighter future for all of us.

Categories
Women Empowerment

Leveraging Technology for Women’s Empowerment

When India’s Prime Minister handed over his social media accounts to five remarkable women achievers – from a chess grandmaster to a farmer-turned-entrepreneur – it was a symbolic celebration of women’s empowerment in the digital ages. Each of these women had harnessed technology for learning, innovation and enterprise, inspiring countless others to imagine new possibilities. But India’s digital revolution has not yet reached the majority of women, especially those in rural and marginalised communities.

According to the latest National Family Health Survey, just over half of urban women have ever used the internet and in rural areas the figure drops to only one in four. This digital divide translates into a gap in education, economic opportunity, healthcare access and voice. Bridging this divide has become essential, and technology – when thoughtfully deployed – is proving to be a powerful equaliser.

Digital inclusion: Bridging gaps in education, work and healthcare

Empowerment begins with access – to information, to services, to opportunity. Today, that access is increasingly digital. Across India and much of the world, mobile phones and the internet have become gateways to learning and livelihood for women who were long constrained by geography, social norms or safety concerns.

In education, a proliferation of government-led digital learning initiatives and private e-learning platforms is bringing knowledge to women and girls who once had to drop out of school or could only dream of a college degree. From mobile apps teaching basic literacy to online coding boot camps, technology is helping women acquire new skills on their own schedule and in their own language.

India’s flagship rural digital literacy program has trained millions of women in basic computer and internet skills, with women accounting for over half of all participants. Partnerships like Google and Tata Trusts’ Internet Saathi initiative alone enabled roughly 30 million rural women to get online over the past decade – women who can now access educational content, government services and job information that was once out of reach.

Access to digital tools also opens doors in the workplace and marketplace. Equipped with a smartphone and some training, a woman in a small village can market her handmade products far beyond her local haat, tapping into e-commerce platforms and social media to reach customers across the country. Indeed, e-commerce and social media have created a new class of women entrepreneurs who operate from their homes yet serve buyers nationwide.

Take the example of India’s social-commerce platform Meesho, which has enabled millions of women in small towns and villages to become online resellers and business owners with zero upfront investment. By leveraging WhatsApp or Facebook, these women turned their social circles into customer networks, selling everything from saris to homemade pickles. The result is extra income and a newfound confidence and financial autonomy. In fact, studies have found that women entrepreneurs who embrace digital payments and online sales tend to grow their revenues faster, as digital tools help them bypass traditional barriers like limited mobility and lack of bank access.

Crucially, technology is helping overcome one of the most stubborn hurdles to women’s economic empowerment which is the lack of financial inclusion. In societies where women often lacked independent bank accounts or credit, fintech innovations have become game-changers. Through mobile banking apps and India’s Jan Dhan Yojana – a national financial inclusion drive – tens of millions of women have opened simple no-frills bank accounts for the first time.

As of early 2025, over 30.3 crore (303 million) women held Jan Dhan accounts, making up about 55.7% of all such accounts. These accounts serve as a crucial on-ramp to economic life: they receive wages or government benefits directly, and they give women a safe place to save money, free from familial control or the risk of theft. The rise of instant digital payment systems like UPI (Unified Payments Interface) further empowers women by giving them a convenient, cashless way to transact and build credit histories.

Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) programmes are depositing funds straight into women’s bank accounts, bypassing middlemen and reducing “leakage” of welfare money – effectively putting financial decision-making power into women’s hands. Each of these steps – digital literacy, e-commerce, fintech, e-governance – forms a piece of a larger puzzle using technology to dismantle the traditional barriers that kept women out of the formal economy.

Healthcare, too, has seen technology emerge as a lifeline for women, especially in remote areas. Telemedicine platforms and health apps are bringing medical advice and counselling to women’s doorsteps, often literally. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, India’s nationwide telemedicine service eSanjeevani scaled up dramatically to connect patients in far-flung villages with doctors in cities via video calls. This has particular benefit for women, who may be less able to travel long distances for care due to household responsibilities or cultural constraints. As of 2023, over 10 crore (100 million) telemedicine consultations had been provided through eSanjeevani and more than 57% of its beneficiaries are women. These virtual consultations make it easier for a new mother to get postpartum care advice or for an adolescent girl to confidentially seek information about reproductive health, without the expense and stigma that might otherwise be involved.

Mobile health apps are also addressing women’s needs – from period trackers and pregnancy guidance in local languages to mental health counselling chats and emergency helplines for domestic abuse. In rural Rajasthan, for instance, women who never had a local gynaecologist are now able to consult obstetric specialists via telemedicine and receive timely guidance on nutrition or high-risk pregnancy warnings. Technology is effectively closing the distance between women and healthcare – bridging not just physical gaps but social ones, by making health information private, personalised and accessible on a simple phone screen.

India’s tech-powered journey toward empowerment

No country illustrates the promise – and complexity – of leveraging technology for women’s empowerment quite like India. Over the past decade, India has embarked on an ambitious effort to digitise governance and social services, with the explicit aim of including those historically left at the margins. This push aligns with the national vision of Viksit Bharat@2047 – a roadmap for a developed, inclusive India by the centennial of independence. A cornerstone of this vision is the belief that “Empowered Women, Empowered India” and that empowerment must begin with inclusive access to rights and services.

In practice, this has meant deploying technology in innovative ways to ensure women and children benefit fully from government programmes – no matter how remote their village, how low their income or how limited their mobility. The Ministry of Women and Child Development (MoWCD) has been at the forefront of this digital transformation, integrating real-time data systems, mobile platforms and transparency mechanisms into its schemes.

Consider the challenge of malnutrition and early childhood care, which disproportionately affect rural women and children. For decades, India’s vast network of Anganwadi centers – village nutrition and childcare clinics – struggled with antiquated record-keeping and patchy service delivery. In 2021, MoWCD launched the Saksham Anganwadi and Poshan Tracker initiative, dragging this network into the digital age. Today, over 1.4 million Anganwadi centres are linked via the Poshan Tracker smartphone app, enabling Anganwadi workers to log nutrition data, growth measurements, and attendance in real time. More than 10 crore pregnant women, nursing mothers, young children and adolescent girls are registered on this platform, which allows authorities to monitor nutrition delivery nationwide at a glance. Where once there were ledgers that took months to compile (and often concealed gaps or the bad word, corruption), there are now real-time dashboards and geo-tagged progress reports. Supervisors can pinpoint which village hasn’t received its supply of supplementary food this week or which child is faltering on growth indicators and act immediately. The digital tracking has ushered in precision, efficiency and accountability in nutrition services and this hasn’t gone unnoticed – Poshan Tracker was recognised with the Prime Minister’s Award for Excellence in Public Administration in 2025. Technology even helped plug leakages in these programmes: a new facial recognition feature for attendance and ration pickup ensures that ghost beneficiaries are weeded out and only the rightful women and children receive the nutrition support, eliminating middlemen and fake claims. These measures, while tech-heavy, ultimately serve the larger purpose of every mother and every child getting the nourishment they are entitled to and any lapses can be caught early rather than lost in bureaucracy.

Another leap has come in the form of paperless, direct aid for pregnant and lactating women. The Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY) – a maternity benefit scheme – historically faced hurdles like slow payments and complex paperwork. By digitising the entire process, those problems are fading. Today, a woman who conceives her first child can register online or via a mobile app with Aadhaar identification, and receive ₹5,000 directly into her bank account to support her nutrition and medical needs during pregnancy. If she has a second child and it’s a girl, some states provide an additional ₹1,000 as an incentive under the Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao initiative. Over ₹19,000 crore in benefits has already been disbursed to more than 4 crore (40 million) women through PMMVY’s digital platform, with doorstep assistance from Anganwadi and ASHA health workers ensuring even women in remote hamlets can enroll. The scheme’s online grievance redressal portal and live dashboards add further transparency – a beneficiary can track her payment status on her phone and officials can quickly spot delays or issues in any district. The upshot is not only quicker assistance to pregnant women, but also a subtle shift in perceptions with women being seen not as passive recipients of welfare but as rights-bearing citizens who can demand and track their entitlements. This model of Direct Benefit Transfer to women’s accounts bolsters women’s say in household spending (since the money is in their name) and it introduces many unbanked women to the formal financial system for the first time. In fact, the success of DBT in schemes like PMMVY has contributed to India’s broader push for women’s financial inclusion, with the majority of Jan Dhan accounts now belonging to women. It is a powerful feedback loop where technology-enabled welfare gives women financial traction, and which in turn empowers them economically and socially.

Beyond health and welfare, technology is also being wielded to protect women’s rights and safety. One notable innovation is the SHe-Box portal – an online platform that provides a single-window mechanism for women across India to report workplace sexual harassment. Under the law (the Prevention of Sexual Harassment Act, 2013), employers must address such complaints, but many women, especially in informal sectors, struggled to navigate the process. SHe-Box has made it as simple as logging on and filling a form; the complaint is then routed to the appropriate authority, and the progress can be tracked online. By bringing a usually hidden injustice into the digital open, this platform has lowered the barriers to reporting abuse and signalled that harassment will no longer be swept under the rug.

Likewise, the Mission Shakti mobile app and dashboard serve as a digital panic button and resource guide for women in distress. A woman facing violence or trafficking can, with a few taps, connect to the nearest One-Stop Crisis Centre and police assistance, rather than physically visiting multiple offices. Nearly every district in India now has an OSC and by linking them digitally, Mission Shakti ensures women can find help immediately and discreetly. These tech tools not only rescue women from danger but also empower them with knowledge – the app, for instance, provides information on legal rights and helplines, reinforcing that women have avenues for justice.

Children, too, benefit from this tech-led governance model, especially girls and orphans who are among the most vulnerable. Under the Juvenile Justice Act, the government launched CARINGS (Child Adoption Resource Information and Guidance System), an online portal that tracks every step of the adoption process. Prospective parents can register, view available children’s profiles (with privacy safeguards) and be vetted through a transparent digital queue, replacing what used to be a murky, delay-ridden system. The portal has brought new transparency and efficiency to child adoption, reducing waiting times and ensuring that adoptive families and children are better matched.

Similarly, Mission Vatsalya is using tech to oversee child welfare institutions and foster care: a centralised dashboard compiles reports from thousands of Child Care Institutions across states, flagging any incident of abuse or violation of child rights in real time. Authorities can thus respond swiftly – for example, if a shelter home reports an incident, national officials see it immediately and can intervene or allocate resources. By knitting together police, legal services and child protection units via one data system, the government has created an accountability chain that is much harder to break. If one asks what difference all these digital interventions make on the ground – the answer lies in outcomes.

Over the past several years, India’s sex ratio at birth has modestly improved from 918 girls per 1000 boys to about 930 per 1000, indicating progress in curbing sex-selective practices and valuing daughters. Maternal mortality has fallen significantly to 97 per 100,000 births, from 130 per 100,000 six years ago. While many factors contribute to these trends (like better health facilities and awareness), officials credit the last-mile targeting and monitoring made possible by technology for accelerating the gains.

At the very least, digitisation has squeezed out some inefficiency and inequality in service delivery, meaning more pregnant women get timely care and more girls survive and thrive. It has also built greater public trust in welfare schemes – when people can see their entitlements credited to their bank or issues resolved on a portal, faith in the system strengthens.

How technology catalyses women’s leadership

One of the most transformative – if less tangible – impacts of technology on women’s empowerment is how it amplifies women’s voices and leadership. Traditional hierarchies often limited who could be a leader: one had to be physically present in meetings, have advanced education or be part of old boys’ networks. Digital platforms are blowing up many of those barriers. Through online education and mentoring networks, women are gaining leadership skills on their own terms. A young woman in a small town can enroll in a virtual leadership workshop or connect with a mentor on LinkedIn, without needing the “right” social connections.

Virtual collaboration tools and remote work, now widely accepted, also enable more women – especially those balancing childcare or eldercare – to take on decision-making roles without being confined to an office from 9 to 5. This flexibility is chipping away at the age-old bias that equated leadership with constant physical availability. Indeed, during the pandemic, many workplaces discovered that productivity and teamwork could survive online; as a result, more women (and men) are advocating to keep these flexible arrangements. For women, this means careers don’t have to pause due to marriage or motherhood – they can continue to lead projects, startups or community initiatives from wherever they are.

Technology has also provided women leaders with new platforms to be heard and taken seriously. In the past, getting a seat at the table – whether in politics, business or academia – was a formidable challenge for women, and even when present, their ideas were often overlooked. Now, consider how social media, blogs and webinars allow women to publish their expertise and build their reputations in a visible way.

Female scientists, entrepreneurs, artists or policy experts can bypass traditional gatekeepers by directly reaching audiences online. A female agronomist in a rural area can start a YouTube channel advising on farming techniques and gain thousands of followers, establishing herself as an authority without needing a male intermediary. Similarly, women in governance can leverage data and transparency tools to strengthen their leadership. In India, many local councils now have women as elected members (thanks to reservations) and some are using apps to track village budgets or WhatsApp groups to coordinate initiatives. These digital tools help them make decisions based on real data and mobilise constituents quickly, thereby enhancing their effectiveness and credibility.

Moreover, the very existence of digital records and analytics in workplaces and government tends to reduce biases – performance can be measured in concrete outcomes (sales figures, response times, etc.) rather than subjective impressions. This shift benefits women, who have historically been judged by stereotypes more than results. In a tech-driven environment, if a woman-led team delivers, the numbers speak louder than any prejudice.

Of course, none of this means the playing field is suddenly even. Online spaces come with their own challenges – harassment and trolling of outspoken women, the need for digital skills that not all have and the risk of new forms of exclusion (like algorithmic bias). But even here, technology is providing counterweights. Women-centric online communities and safety apps are emerging to support those who face abuse or discrimination.

For instance, encrypted reporting apps allow women in an organisation to collectively flag a harasser, making it harder for incidents to be silenced. Campaigns for digital citizenship education are teaching young girls how to navigate the internet safely and assertively. All these efforts contribute to an environment where more women dare to step into leadership roles, knowing they have tools and allies at their disposal.

Empowering through collaborative action

The digital gender gap is a work in progress and the reality remains that a large number of women are still offline or only minimally connected. This is where collaboration between government, private sector and civil society becomes crucial. As an example, consider the role of NGOs like Smile Foundation, which works across India to bring technology and training to those at the last mile. In partnership with government bodies and corporates, Smile Foundation extends the reach of digital empowerment into some of the country’s most underserved regions. A key focus area has been integrating technology into STEM education (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) for girls and young women, to sow the seeds of future empowerment. Through its STEM for Education initiatives, Smile Foundation has introduced thousands of students from low-income communities to the marvels of robotics, coding and even aerospace modelling – fields they barely knew existed.

In one year-long collaboration with IIT Bombay, over 1,000 students from under-resourced schools were mentored in hands-on projects like 3D printing, building hovercrafts, solar lamp making and basic robotics. Many of these students were girls who, for the first time, got to tinker in a state-of-the-art lab and see themselves as potential engineers or scientists. Not only do these girls learnt technical skills, they also gained the confidence to pursue higher education and careers in STEM, traditionally male-dominated arenas.

By embedding technology in education, NGOs like Smile are preparing the next generation of women to be creators of technology, not just users. We provide teacher training, digital learning modules in local languages and even basic infrastructure like tablets or projectors in rural classrooms. The approach is holistic combining curriculum with curiosity. As one Smile Foundation programme manager put it, exposure leads to aspiration: a girl who has built a simple circuit in 8th grade is far more likely to envision herself as an electrical engineer a few years later.

Importantly, these community-level interventions complement larger government schemes. While the government builds digital highways and platforms, it often takes local trust and tailored training to actually get women to walk those highways. Public-private partnerships and CSR-funded programmes have stepped in to do just that. We organise digital literacy camps for women, set up computer centres in villages or provide micro-loans for women to buy smartphones.

By one estimate, nearly 20 million of the people made digitally literate under the Pradhan Mantri Digital Saksharta Abhiyan were women – over half of all trainees. This was possible because implementation partners went door-to-door to convince families to let their daughters learn computers and because classes were held at times that women could attend.

Likewise, numerous success stories underscore how a nudge from an NGO or a company can turn technology into empowerment. In one Haryana village, a group of women trained by UNDP listed their homemade bangles on Facebook Marketplace, boosting their festive-season earnings by 60%. In Maharashtra, an Internet Saathi trainee went on to launch her own honey business online and now mentors other village women in digital entrepreneurship. These examples show that when women gain digital skills and support, they don’t just improve their own lives but also become catalysts for broader community change, hiring other women, sharing knowledge and breaking stereotypes one by one.

Technology is not a panacea or a standalone solution but an enabler that can accelerate every other aspect of women’s empowerment. The task now is to ensure that digital inclusion efforts leave no woman behind. This means addressing affordability (so that devices and data plans are within reach for poor women), promoting digital literacy in vernacular languages and ensuring online spaces are safe from abuse and misinformation that disproportionately target women. It also means designing technology with women’s needs in mind: for example, fintech products tailored for women with irregular incomes or e-learning content that accounts for women’s dual burdens of work and home. The Indian government’s ongoing programs, from Digital India to Mission Shakti, signal a commitment to this inclusive approach, but they will need continuous feedback and course correction. For instance, if a dashboard shows fewer women using a portal in one region, officials and activists should investigate whether cultural factors are at play and address them through awareness campaigns.

In conclusion, leveraging technology for women’s empowerment is about rewriting social scripts. It’s about a woman in a remote village who can now assert her rights because she knows the government scheme and can apply online; a young graduate who can work for a multinational company from her hometown; a mother who gains respect in her family because money is coming into her bank account; a girl who decides to become a scientist because she fell in love with coding at a workshop. Each of these stories, multiplied millions of times, adds up to a society transformed. India’s journey shows both the immense potential of technology and the importance of thoughtful implementation.

Digital tools have enabled timely interventions in nutrition, education, health and justice, ensuring that development benefits are no longer confined to the privileged urban elite. They have embedded transparency and accountability into public service delivery, making the state more responsive to every woman at the last mile. And perhaps most importantly, they have given women a newfound voice – whether through data, through entrepreneurship or through online networks of solidarity.

For India’s women, once isolated by distances both physical and societal, that bridge is proving to be nothing short of transformational. The task now is to strengthen it, widen it, and ensure that every woman, from the cities to the deepest villages can stride across to claim her rightful future.

Sources:

Categories
Education Women Empowerment

Digital Pathways to Women Empowerment

When the Prime Minister entrusted his social media platform to remarkable women achievers Vaishali Rameshbabu (chess grandmaster), Elina Mishra (nuclear scientist) Shilpi Soni (space scientist), Anita Devi (farmer-entrepreneur) and Ajaita Shah (CEO of Frontier Markets), it was a celebration of women empowerment in its truest sense. Each of these women, through dedicated training and skill development, harnessed the potential of digital tools for learning, innovation and market access—transforming personal expertise into national impact, and inspiring countless others to reimagine what is possible.

But these stories, as powerful as they are, risk masking a harder truth. India’s digital revolution has not yet reached most women. The National Family Health Survey reveals that just over half of urban women use the internet (51.8% of urban women to be precise), and in rural areas the figure drops to one in four

For women in rural areas, this gap translates into slower economic advancement, as limited access to digital tools shut them out of markets, innovations and opportunities that could drive both individual mobility and collective growth.

Women empowerment rests on economic stability

Anchored in the promise of the Sustainable Development Goals — and reinforced by India’s own CSR mandate — lies a simple truth that women’s empowerment in the 21st century cannot be achieved without digital inclusion. Technology is a gateway to opportunity, dignity and independence. It is the bridge that allows women to shape not only their own futures, but also that of their communities.

Yet India continues to stumble on the most basic step of putting a smartphone in every woman’s hand. In low-income families, device ownership for women remains elusive. In rural areas, affordability, low literacy, restrictive social norms and safety concerns layer barriers upon barriers. The result is stark digital exclusion — and with it, a narrowing of women’s choices.

This exclusion is not abstract and it directly impacts women empowerment, as it limits- 

  1. Participation in markets
  2. Access to finance 
  3. Engagement in governance processes 

It also shows up in entrepreneurship. Women-owned enterprises make up barely one-fifth of India’s registered MSMEs (only 20.5%), according to the Udyam portal. The digital divide compounds this inequity, making it harder for women to scale ideas, connect with customers or tap into supply chains.

If left unaddressed, this gap will calcify. It risks creating two parallel economies —  one where men ride the momentum of digital growth, and another where women remain on the margins. Digital empowerment is not an add-on to gender equity — it is its backbone. Without it, India’s growth story will remain half-written.

Government-led digital pathways for women 

Over the years, India has taken important steps to bridge the digital divide for women, especially in rural areas. From digital literacy drives and online marketplaces to financial inclusion through mobile-linked bank accounts, these initiatives reflect a growing recognition of technology being not just a tool, but one of the digital pathways to empowerment.

By giving women the skills to navigate digital platforms, access markets and manage their own finances, these efforts open doors to opportunity and independence. But while the framework exists, the real challenge lies in ensuring that every woman can actually benefit from it.

Collective efforts for consolidated solution  

While the government may lay the groundwork for women’s empowerment, the story cannot end there. Real change in rural India depends on whether women are given the skills, tools and confidence to use those opportunities. This is where social stakeholders come in.

CSR–NGO partnerships have the power to turn good intentions into lasting impact. By complementing government initiatives with targeted training and digital access, they can help women move from the margins to the marketplace. They can ensure that empowerment is about women building livelihoods that last, communities that thrive and futures they can shape on their own terms.

While the Government of India is spearheading the women empowerment movement creating pathways for rural women to achieve financial independence and stability, the role of social stakeholders remains critical. CSR–NGO partnerships carry an equal responsibility to ensure these initiatives realise their full potential. By complementing governmental efforts with targeted support, they can equip women in rural India with essential skills and digital tools, enabling them to build sustainable livelihoods and stand confidently on their own feet.

Outcome-driven CSR model for women’s empowerment under Schedule VII

India has no shortage of well-intentioned programmes for women. But the question is no longer if we should empower women — it’s how. And increasingly, the answer lies in what happens when corporations and NGOs come together with purpose, not just compliance.

An outcome-driven approach, when aligned with Schedule VII of the Companies Act, can push CSR spending beyond tokenism. It can deliver real, measurable change if partnerships are designed to pool expertise, networks and resources. 

Education and skills: The first lever of change

The story of empowerment often begins in the classroom — or these days, on a screen. Investment in vernacular digital and financial literacy, accredited training and mentorship networks arms women with market-ready skills. It also gives them the confidence to step into India’s rapidly shifting economic landscape.

Breaking barriers to equality

CSR funds directed towards safety technologies and leadership pipelines do more than tick boxes on gender equality. They chip away at systemic barriers, creating pathways for women to participate fully in digital, corporate and entrepreneurial ecosystems that have long excluded them.

Building livelihoods, not just incomes

When women in rural India are connected to e-commerce platforms, supported with logistics solutions and integrated into local markets, the result is not just higher earnings. It is the transformation of livelihoods — whole families and communities stand taller when women producers gain access to profitable markets.

Seeding women-led innovation

Perhaps the most exciting frontier is incubation. Co-funded CSR–NGO interventions can back women-led startups in agritech, fintech or edtech — areas that directly touch the challenges rural women face daily. With the right support, these businesses change how communities live, learn and work.

Real faces of empowerment

Yashodha, once a learner herself, now trains rural women in Aari work through Smile Foundation’s programme, blending embroidery, business skills and digital know-how — empowering them to earn, support their families and inspire others toward self-reliance.

Through Smile Foundation’s training, Sowmya turned cotton wick-making into a steady income stream. Learning business planning, cost tracking, navigating digital payment platforms and local market outreach gave her financial stability, family support and the pride of shaping her own economic independence.

Women’s empowerment in action with Swabhiman

In villages where opportunity once felt distant, Smile Foundation’s Swabhiman programme is helping women embrace digital tools — running businesses on smartphones, selling through online marketplaces and taking control of their economic future.

Core Empowerment Pillars:

  • Entrepreneurship & Skill Development – Tailored training for women from rural and urban low-income areas, enabling them to start, manage and grow small-scale enterprises.
  • Financial Literacy – Guidance on budgeting, profit calculation, savings and reinvestment, ensuring sustainable business growth.
  • Market Linkages – Support in connecting with local, regional and digital buyers, expanding customer reach.
  • Digital Inclusion – Vernacular training in e-commerce onboarding and technology adoption.

With mentorship from industry experts and in-house trainers, participants master business planning, marketing and customer engagement. This knowledge has already led to the creation of 68 women-led businesses and micro-enterprises in FY 24, breaking traditional gender barriers and driving community progress.

For these women, empowerment is the confidence to lead, the resilience to adapt and the ability to inspire the next generation.

Power change, together!

Digital empowerment is the foundation for women’s economic participation in India’s growth story. While government schemes have set the stage, the journey from awareness to adoption demands the collective strength of CSR, NGOs and local communities. By bridging the digital divide, Smile Foundation enables women to scale businesses, lead change and inspire generations. 

Partner with us!

Sources:

Categories
Smile

Can India Retain Its Best Minds?

Every year, millions of Indians pack their bags for foreign universities, hospitals, and laboratories. More than 1.8 million study abroad; hundreds of thousands more settle in richer economies. This global demand flatters India’s education system — but at home, the departures have begun to look like a strategic loss.

In recent years this outflow of brain drain has reached striking levels. Between 2015 and 2022, an estimated 1.3 million Indians emigrated, many of them doctors, engineers, IT professionals and academics. In 2022 alone, a record 225,000 Indians renounced their citizenship, often to acquire passports of countries like the United States, Canada, Australia, and those in Europe.

This exodus reflects both the global demand for Indian talent and persistent gaps in India’s domestic environment. As India aspires to great-power economic status and self-reliance, the question of how to stem talent loss – or even convert it into “brain gain” – has taken on new urgency.

The scale of India’s talent exodus

By sheer numbers, India’s diaspora is the largest in the world – roughly 20 million Indians were living overseas as of 2020. Not all are highly skilled, but a significant share are professionals and students, and this number is climbing fast. In fact, India now accounts for a third of all international students in major destination countries (U.S., UK, Canada, Australia), a huge jump from just 11% a decade ago.

Every year, hundreds of thousands of young Indians enroll in foreign universities – an educational exodus financed by families back home. Indian households spent about $44 billion in 2024 on overseas education for their children, a figure projected to double to $91 billion by 2030. This includes tuition and living expenses and represents a massive outflow of capital. There is also a steady stream of skilled workers moving overseas for jobs. On average around 2.5 million Indians emigrate each year (of all skill levels), a trend that “threatens India’s growth by depleting its skilled human capital,” as one analysis noted.

The profile of this migrant talent pool spans industries. In technology, Indians comprise a sizeable portion of Silicon Valley’s workforce and startup founders. An estimated one-third of engineers in Silicon Valley are of Indian origin, and Indians have founded or led dozens of “unicorn” tech startups globally. In corporate leadership, Indians punch above their weight: over 10% of Fortune 500 CEOs are Indian-born or of Indian origin, running giants like Google, Microsoft and Adobe.

In medicine, India is one of the largest exporters of doctors and nurses; for example, Indian-trained physicians form a significant part of the workforce in the UK, US, Canada and the Gulf. This outward flow underscores India’s strong education in fields like engineering and medicine – but also raises flags about domestic shortages.

In academia and research, Indian scientists often seek opportunities abroad: India was the second-largest source of foreign science and engineering PhD students in the U.S. in the 2000s and 2010s (after China) and Indian students earned about 13% of U.S. doctorates awarded to foreign nationals in 2018. These figures illustrate the scale at which India’s talent is contributing to other economies and institutions.

Why India’s brightest leave

The causes of India’s brain drain are multifaceted, involving both “push” factors at home and “pull” factors from abroad. Surveys and studies consistently point to a mix of economic, professional and quality-of-life motivations driving Indians to migrate. Some of the key reasons include:

  • Higher salaries and career opportunities: A talented professional in technology or healthcare can earn significantly more in Silicon Valley or London than in India. Many global companies actively recruit in India – for instance, tech giants like Google and Microsoft hire scores of Indian engineers and Western healthcare systems eagerly accept Indian doctors and nurses. The wage differentials are stark; even Indian IT firms have sometimes facilitated “talent export” by sending employees abroad on projects and H-1B visas. Ambitious individuals often feel that top roles, cutting-edge projects or a fast career trajectory are more accessible overseas.
  • Research and academic infrastructure: For scientists, researchers and academics, the allure of world-class labs, abundant research funding and intellectual freedom in the U.S. or Europe is strong. India’s R&D spending has hovered around a low ~0.7% of GDP, trailing far behind advanced economies that invest 2–3% of GDP in research. This translates to fewer research positions and grants at home. A physics or biotech PhD from IIT might head to the West where universities and companies offer state-of-the-art facilities and support for innovation. The limited availability of postdoctoral and faculty positions in India’s universities and national labs also pushes many freshly minted Indian PhDs to continue their careers abroad.
  • Quality of life and public services: Many emigrants cite better living standards abroad – everything from reliable infrastructure to cleaner air. Big Indian cities struggle with problems such as pollution, traffic congestion and strained public services. For instance, air quality in Delhi or Mumbai often exceeds safe limits, which is a deterrent for those who can choose a life in cleaner environments. Additionally, concerns about public safety and governance play a role. A study of migrating healthcare professionals noted that personal safety, law and order and environmental conditions are significant in the decision to settle abroad. Countries like Canada and Australia actively market themselves to skilled immigrants with promises of safe cities, efficient public transport and social benefits, making them attractive to Indian families.
  • Education and skill gaps: Ironically, one driver of student exodus is the limited capacity and competitiveness of India’s own education system. Top Indian institutions (IITs, IIMs, AIIMS, etc.) are world-class but can only admit a tiny fraction of applicants. Many students who don’t secure one of those few spots or who can afford it, opt for universities in the U.S., UK or Australia. Others are drawn by specialised courses or interdisciplinary programmes not widely available in India. In some fields, attending a Western university is seen as a fast-track to international careers. Additionally, the high cost or limited quality of certain programmes at home (for example, expensive private medical colleges) pushes students to seek better value abroad. This educational outbound flow has become a major facet of brain drain, as a large share of those who go abroad for studies choose to start careers and settle there after graduating.
  • Immigration policies abroad: On the pull side, many developed countries have immigration policies explicitly designed to attract skilled workers. The points-based systems in Canada and Australia, the H-1B work visa in the U.S., and talent visa schemes in European countries all act as magnets for Indian talent. In recent years, Canada has seen tens of thousands of Indian IT professionals and students become permanent residents annually, thanks to its welcoming stance on skilled immigration. These policies, combined with large Indian diaspora communities already established overseas, create a reinforcing cycle inviting more Indians to migrate.
  • Entrepreneurial ecosystem: For startup founders and entrepreneurs, certain foreign locales offer easier access to venture capital, mentorship and markets. Silicon Valley’s vibrant ecosystem, for example, has drawn numerous Indian entrepreneurs. While India’s own startup scene has grown (Bengaluru and Delhi are now major hubs), some innovators still leave to incorporate their companies in the U.S. or Singapore to tap global investors and infrastructure. Until very recently, regulations in India made doing business comparatively cumbersome, which led some entrepreneurs to move abroad for a more favourable business climate. High-net-worth individuals have also emigrated for reasons like lower tax regimes or more stable regulations elsewhere – between 2014 and 2018, approximately 23,000 Indian millionaires left the country, according to one World Bank report. This “rich-person brain drain” underscores that beyond scientists or engineers, the wealthy and business elite may also seek greener pastures.

It’s evident that brain drain is not simply individual wanderlust, but rooted in structural issues. As one commentary put it, India must address “the urgent need for systemic reforms” so that talented citizens find educational excellence, economic opportunity and an innovative environment at home. Otherwise, the magnetic pull of developed nations will continue to draw India’s best and brightest away.

The cost of talent loss

The impacts of brain drain on India are profound and multi-dimensional. At the most direct level, every skilled worker or scholar who leaves represents a loss of human capital for the Indian economy. The country effectively subsidises the education and training of these individuals only to see another nation reap the benefits of their productivity. A study on the fiscal effects of emigration estimated that India loses the equivalent of about 0.5% of its gross national income each year due to high-skilled workers moving to the U.S., which is roughly 2.5% of India’s total tax revenue.

In concrete terms, this is a loss of tens of billions of dollars in potential annual economic output and taxes. In the critical IT sector alone, India may be forfeiting $15–20 billion annually by way of talent that contributes to foreign firms and economies instead of domestically. One informal estimate even pegged the overall cost of brain drain at $160 billion per year, which interestingly is about double India’s defense budget. While such figures are hard to pin down precisely, they underscore the massive opportunity cost of educated Indians working abroad.

The innovation deficit is another concern. When top scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs leave, the country loses out not only on their current contributions but on the multiplier effect they could have had – the startups they might have founded, the patents they might have filed, the students they might have mentored. Silicon Valley’s gain in Indian talent has at times been India’s loss in technological leadership. For example, many Indian-origin tech leaders in the West could have been driving innovation in India’s own companies or research labs, had the conditions been right.

A brain drain of researchers can weaken local knowledge networks, as innovative ideas and collaborations flow outwards. It is telling that India, despite its large workforce, still underperforms in high-end innovation metrics (such as patents per capita or research publications) relative to its potential – a gap partly attributable to decades of scientific talent migrating.

Certain sectors feel the pinch of talent loss acutely. The healthcare sector is a prime example and case study in brain drain dynamics. India today has roughly one million active doctors for a population of 1.4 billion, well below the recommended ratio. Yet India has trained many more doctors – a large number have moved to countries like the UK, U.S., Canada and Australia which actively recruit medical professionals. This outflow “mitigates the effects of increased domestic healthcare spending” by creating shortages of specialists and experienced clinicians in India.

For instance, Indian hospitals, especially in rural areas, struggle to hire enough doctors even as Indian physicians serve in large numbers abroad. The nursing workforce shows a similar trend: states like Kerala and Punjab have a tradition of nurses emigrating to the Gulf or West, leading to domestic shortfalls. The result is an uneven health system where certain regions in India remain underserved. Brain drain thus can quite literally be measured in human lives when you consider patients who lack adequate doctors or healthcare workers.

Beyond the immediate economic and service delivery impacts, there is also a psychological and social cost. A persistent narrative of talent leaving can create a sense of pessimism or diminished national confidence. It can also reinforce itself: if young people see their role models and peers all planning to go abroad, they too are more likely to aspire to leave. This can erode the ambition to improve one’s own country.

Moreover, high-profile cases of brain drain – like Indian engineers driving Silicon Valley or Indian scientists in NASA – often spark debates within India about the environment that drove them away. As one policy forum noted, issues like high taxation, bureaucracy and inadequate research infrastructure in India have discouraged some expats from returning and deterred would-be innovators at home. The loss of any single individual might not cripple a nation of India’s size, but cumulatively the talent outflow has meant fewer dynamic job creators, thought leaders and experts on the ground in India.

It’s not all a one-way loss, however. There are also countervailing gains and silver linings from having a large global Indian diaspora – something we explore later. For now, it’s clear that the net effect of brain drain is a serious concern. Recognising these costs has galvanised Indian policymakers and institutions to search for solutions to convert “brain drain” into “brain gain.”

Efforts to reverse the trend

Facing the challenge head-on, India in recent years has launched a multi-pronged effort to retain talent and incentivise its return. The government, academic institutions and even private sector have started addressing the root causes that drive people away – from boosting research funding to improving career prospects. Key initiatives and policy measures include:

  • Investing in research & innovation: A core strategy is to build world-class research infrastructure at home so scientists and engineers don’t feel they must go abroad to do cutting-edge work. The Department of Science & Technology (DST) and other agencies have pumped funds into new labs, centres of excellence and grant programmes. For example, DST’s Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure (FIST) programme provides grants to universities to upgrade laboratories. Likewise, a new National Research Foundation (NRF) was established by an Act in 2023 to steer more strategic research funding into Indian institutions. These efforts aim to address the chronic underfunding of R&D. There’s also greater support for innovation and startups: the Startup India initiative launched in 2016 created a seed fund (₹9.5 billion) and a network of incubators across the country. Today, India boasts the 3rd largest startup ecosystem globally (over 100 unicorn startups), indicating growing opportunities for innovators to thrive without leaving.
  • Improving compensation and career paths: Recognising that salary differentials drive many away, some Indian sectors have begun offering more competitive packages, especially in tech and academia. Government research institutions introduced schemes like Performance Related Incentive Scheme (PRIS) and flexible promotions to reward productivity. Premier educational institutions (IITs, IISc, AIIMS, etc.) have been granted more autonomy to hire top talent, sometimes at higher pay scales or with modern tenure tracks, to attract global-caliber faculty. There is also discussion of offering tax incentives or easing administrative hurdles for returning professionals, such as fast-tracking visas or providing tax breaks on income for a few years, though concrete policies on this front are still evolving. The private sector, for its part, has seen MNCs establishing R&D centers in India that pay internationally competitive salaries (Google, Microsoft and IBM all have large research labs in India now). If India’s rapid economic growth continues, the gap in salaries and opportunities vis-à-vis the West is expected to narrow, reducing the push factor over time.
  • Academic and scientific diaspora programmes: India is explicitly trying to convert brain drain into brain circulation by tapping its diaspora for collaboration and short-term return. A notable effort is the Vaishvik Bhartiya Vaigyanik (VAIBHAV) initiative, a programme to connect Indian-origin scientists abroad with domestic researchers and institutions. Through VAIBHAV, webinars and joint projects have been set up in frontier fields, leveraging the expertise of the diaspora without requiring permanent relocation. Another programme, GIAN (Global Initiative of Academic Networks), invites accomplished foreign and diaspora academics to teach in Indian universities for short stints, exposing students to global knowledge. The Visiting Advanced Joint Research (VAJRA) Faculty programme provides grants for overseas scientists (including non-resident Indians) to spend 3–12 months in India collaborating on research. Unlike permanent return schemes, VAJRA’s goal is to harness global expertise on a flexible basis – effectively importing knowledge even if the expert’s primary base remains abroad. Such exchanges help plug some brain drain gaps by ensuring India’s scholars and students can work with the best minds, no matter where they reside.
  • Reverse brain drain fellowships: To actively lure top Indian talent back home, specialised fellowships have been very important. The Ramanujan Fellowship, for example, is targeted at brilliant Indian scientists and engineers under 40 who are working abroad and wish to return. It offers an attractive research grant and salary top-up for five years for those who come to work at an Indian institution. In the last five years, about 550 researchers have returned to India under the Ramanujan Fellowship scheme alone. Similarly, the DBT Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship (run by the biotechnology department) has brought back over 600 Indian biomedical scientists from overseas since its inception in 2007. These programmes effectively act as a brain gain pipeline, targeting Indians who have gained experience in top labs abroad and giving them resources to set up labs in India. Another scheme, INSPIRE Faculty Fellowship, aims to retain recent PhD holders by providing funding to start their independent research career in India instead of going abroad. By mitigating the financial and professional risks of returning, these fellowships have had some success in reversing the brain drain in academia and R&D.
  • Education reforms at home: In the long run, improving India’s higher education system is crucial to reducing the need for students to go abroad in the first place. The government’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 is a major overhaul aimed at modernising curricula, promoting multidisciplinary learning and expanding capacity at top institutions. Notably, NEP 2020 also proposes allowing top foreign universities to set up campuses in India and forging international collaborations. If implemented, this could give Indian students the option to get a world-class education without leaving the country. The policy also introduced a 5+3+3+4 school structure and more focus on vocational and skill training from a young age. Over time, these reforms seek to produce graduates who are globally competent but also well-integrated into India’s development needs, thus reducing the push factors for emigration. Early signs of progress include a few foreign institutions expressing interest in opening India branches, and some IITs planning overseas campuses which could eventually stem “education drain.”
  • Streamlining governance and opportunities: A broader aspect of retaining talent is making India an attractive place to live and work by tackling the governance issues that often frustrate professionals. Reforms to simplify bureaucratic processes, reduce red tape and fight corruption are ongoing; India’s ease-of-doing-business ranking has improved markedly over the past decade (though more at the macro level). Efforts to improve urban living conditions – from smart city initiatives to pollution control measures – though slow, are aimed at addressing quality-of-life concerns. Additionally, the government has been engaging with the diaspora through events like the Pravasi Bharatiya Divas (Diaspora Day) and creating channels for them to invest in India’s development projects. The underlying message is that India is “open for return” and values the expertise and capital of its overseas citizens.

It’s worth noting that some officials have downplayed the severity of brain drain, pointing out that India’s large population and talent base continue to produce many skilled workers. A recent parliamentary statement even claimed “no significant brain drain” has been observed that would adversely affect India’s science and tech progress. But this view likely hinges on the expectation that new initiatives will keep more talent at home.

Indeed, if India successfully implements these policies – better research funding, quality education expansion, diaspora collaboration and a friendlier business environment – it can create a virtuous cycle where fewer people feel compelled to leave and some who left choose to return, thus transforming brain drain into brain gain.

Grassroots education and the talent pipeline

Reversing brain drain is not only about enticing top scientists or corporate leaders to stay; it also requires nurturing the next generation of talent from the ground up. Analysts argue that brain drain reflects a systemic failure to fully develop and utilise talent within the country. That failure often begins at the earliest stages of education. Many bright individuals in India never get the opportunity to become high-skilled workers in the first place due to disparities in primary and secondary education, especially in rural and under sourced areas.

Strengthening the grassroots education ecosystem is therefore a key long-term strategy to combat brain drain. The logic is twofold: first, a larger and more equitably educated population means India can afford to lose some talent and still have plenty at home; second, individuals who are deeply rooted in their communities and empowered from a young age may be more inclined to contribute locally rather than seek validation solely abroad.

Community-based initiatives have shown promise in this regard. For example, the Smile Foundation’s Empowering Grassroots programme works with over 500 community-based organisations to improve schooling, nutrition and mentorship for children in rural villages, urban slums and tribal regions. By investing in early education, life skills and local role models, such programmes aim to produce a generation of achievers who have strong ties to their home communities.

The Foundation’s Mission Education initiative provides not just academics but also healthcare and nutrition to tens of thousands of children from marginalised backgrounds. The impact of these efforts is seen in improved learning outcomes and higher aspirations among students who otherwise might have been left behind. Crucially, these grassroots programmes also instill a sense of social responsibility and confidence in youth.

A student from a village who succeeds through community-supported schooling may feel a commitment to give back or build something in their hometown, rather than simply join the urban migration rat-race or go abroad. In essence, community schooling and mentorship can create socially rooted, resilient citizens who see viable futures in India.

This approach addresses a subtle facet of brain drain: the narrative of success. If success is consistently portrayed as “going to America” or working in a foreign multinational, young talent will gravitate to that image. But if success stories emerge of innovators and leaders who arose from rural India and stayed to improve their communities, it broadens the imagination of what is possible domestically. There are already examples – entrepreneurs building startups in smaller Indian cities, NGOs led by foreign-educated Indians who returned, local governance champions, etc.

Scaling up grassroots capacity-building can multiply these examples. Over time, bolstering educational equity (more quality schools, teachers and scholarships across India) will enlarge the talent pool and reduce the feeling that one must escape India to fulfill one’s potential. It’s a slow solution, but a sustainable one for long-term brain gain: ensuring India’s intellectual capital is grown and retained from the bottom up, not just retained at the top. As the Economist might put it, the country needs not only world-class universities but also world-class primary schools, so the brightest minds of the next generation see a future in India at every stage of their development.

The diaspora dividend: From brain drain to brain bank

While brain drain poses challenges, India’s global diaspora also represents a tremendous asset – a “brain bank” that India can draw upon. The 32-million-strong Indian diaspora (including people of Indian origin) has achieved remarkable success overseas and many remain emotionally and economically connected to India. One clear benefit is remittances: India has been the world’s top recipient of remittances for over a decade. In 2022, the Indian diaspora sent home an unprecedented $111 billion in remittances, equivalent to about 3.3% of India’s GDP. This is larger than India’s earnings from IT exports or any single category of export. These inflows help stabilise India’s balance of payments and support millions of families.

Notably, about 36% of these remittances came from high-skilled Indian migrants in the U.S., UK and other high-income countries – a testament that even many well-educated Indians abroad send money to support parents, invest in property or fund charities at home. On the other hand, less-skilled migrants in the Gulf contributed around 28% of remittances. In sum, what India loses in direct talent, it partly gains back in financial flows from its overseas citizens.

Remittances to India reached $111 billion in 2022 – by far the largest in South Asia – but as a share of GDP (3.3%) they are lower than smaller countries that rely more on labour migration.

Beyond money, the diaspora boosts India’s soft power and global influence. Indian-origin CEOs of global companies, for instance, have often acted as unofficial ambassadors of India’s talent to the world. The likes of Sundar Pichai (Google) or Satya Nadella (Microsoft) bring visibility to India’s strengths in tech and management. Diplomatically, countries with a strong Indian diaspora (like the U.S., UK, Canada) tend to have interest groups and caucuses that lobby for good relations with India. Culturally, the spread of Bollywood, yoga and Indian cuisine worldwide owes much to diaspora communities acting as cultural carriers. All of this strengthens India’s global standing in ways that are hard to quantify but valuable.

The concept of “brain circulation” is gaining traction as a way to turn brain drain into an advantage. Instead of a one-way loss, India can benefit if its overseas talent remains engaged and circulates knowledge back. There are numerous examples of this: Indian professors in the U.S. co-authoring research papers with colleagues in India; successful Indian entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley mentoring or investing in Indian startups; doctors of Indian origin abroad conducting free medical camps or training sessions in India; and the returnees who come back with new skills.

In fact, the rise of India’s IT and outsourcing industry in the 1990s and 2000s was catalysed by diaspora professionals who returned or built business bridges – the founders of major IT firms and many venture capital funds had international experience. Today, the Indian startup scene sees significant funding from diaspora investors. The Global Innovation Index rankings of recent years have noted India’s progress and attribute part of it to the knowledge linkages of its diaspora scientists and engineers. A fascinating observation is how China leveraged its diaspora: many Chinese-origin scholars abroad began citing and collaborating with China-based researchers, boosting China’s scientific output. India is trying a similar approach, encouraging its scientists overseas to contribute to domestic research from afar.

Moreover, not all who leave are gone forever. A trend of reverse migration or “brain gain” has begun in small numbers. Some Indian professionals, after a decade in the West, choose to return home for personal or professional reasons – be it the pull of family, the attraction of India’s growing market or a desire to contribute to their homeland. For example, in the past few years, senior executives from Silicon Valley have moved to Bangalore to lead Indian tech firms or venture funds.

Certain government initiatives, like the ones mentioned (Ramanujan fellowships, etc.), have convinced expatriate researchers to come back. While these returnees are still a trickle compared to the outflow, they have outsized impact by bringing global expertise to India’s institutions. Each such case also serves as a symbol of possibilities, showing that India can be a place where world-class careers are possible.

In essence, India’s aim is to strike a balance – to maintain a healthy circulation of talent. As one commentator framed it, the goal should be not to completely halt brain drain (which is neither feasible nor desirable in an open world), but to transform it into brain circulation where the Indian “brain network” spans continents but remains connected to India. With strategic engagement, the vast Indian diaspora can be India’s “brain reserve,” contributing to national development through remittances, investments, knowledge exchange, and even return migration. Or as a pithy saying goes, if China has built physical infrastructure across the world, India has built influence through its people. Harnessing that influence is key to turning the brain drain narrative into one of brain gain.

Toward brain gain

Reversing India’s brain drain is a complex challenge – akin to “navigating a labyrinth,” as one policy forum described it. There is no single magic bullet; it requires coordinated improvements across India’s educational, economic and governance landscape. The analysis above suggests a dual focus strategy. In the short to medium term, India must continue enhancing domestic opportunities for excellence: better universities, more R&D funding, thriving industries and liveable cities.

When talented Indians see that they can fulfill their aspirations at home nearly as well as abroad, the incentive to leave will naturally diminish. Initial signs are encouraging – India’s rising economy and vibrant tech sector are already persuading some to stay, and even luring back a few who left. If sustained, investments in research, innovation and education will gradually make India a global knowledge hub in its own right, not just a supplier of talent to hubs elsewhere.

Equally important is the long-term groundwork of human capital development. This means fixing the leaky pipes at the source: providing quality schooling and mentorship at the grassroots so that all Indians with ability can rise. By broadening and diversifying the talent pipeline, India ensures that one person’s emigration is not a catastrophic loss because many others are ready to step up. And those who do rise from humble roots might be more inclined to drive change in their communities, creating a virtuous cycle of development. Over time, a more inclusive and robust domestic talent pool will reduce the desperation or necessity that often underlies brain drain. It will also produce leaders who are socially rooted and perhaps less inclined to permanently relocate, preferring instead to improve conditions in India. As this happens, the narrative shifts “from brain drain to brain gain” – with India not only sending out talent, but increasingly attracting talent and capital back.

Finally, embracing the diaspora as partners is crucial. Rather than lamenting those who left, India is learning to leverage their success. The vision of Viksit Bharat (Developed India) 2047, by the time India reaches 100 years of independence, explicitly counts on diaspora collaboration and returnees to boost India’s leap into a developed, innovation-driven economy. This is a pragmatic and modern outlook: in a globalised world, migration can be a win-win if managed well.

Migrants gain skills and income abroad, and with the right incentives and attachments, their homeland can benefit through remittances, investments and knowledge transfer. The key is keeping the connections alive. India’s policies are gradually moving in that direction – from easier OCI (Overseas Citizen of India) cards to involving diaspora experts in advisory roles. If India succeeds, it will exemplify what some scholars term not a brain drain but a “brain circulation” system, where human capital flows out but also circulates back in new forms.

In conclusion, India’s brain drain challenge is real and pressing, but it is not insurmountable. The country’s vast population means it can continue to supply global talent, but with wise policy it can also increasingly retain talent and welcome it back. The road to brain gain runs through strengthening institutions at home and building bridges abroad. By tackling educational inequities, improving research ecosystems, incentivising returns and leveraging its diaspora, India can turn the tide. The transformation will not happen overnight – it’s a generational endeavour – but the stakes are high. A India that keeps its best minds (or welcomes them back after they win laurels abroad) will be in a far stronger position to innovate, grow economically, and solve its development challenges.

The brain drain, in other words, can be converted into a brain trust. As India marches towards great-power status, retaining its human capital will be as vital as any infrastructure or economic reform. The coming years will test whether India can indeed channel its famed talent pipeline inward for its own advancement, fulfilling the promise of “brain gain” after decades of brain drain.

Categories
Health

What the Pandemic Taught Us About Public Health Education

The world in the aftermath of COVID-19 can be distinctly divided into two eras: pre-pandemic and post-pandemic. The crisis was not only a global health emergency but also a profound social rupture that redefined how we live, communicate, work and engage with systems meant to support our well-being. The pandemic was a stress test — one that laid bare the structural vulnerabilities in our societies and revealed uncomfortable truths about everyday life that had long gone unaddressed. 

As COVID-19 swept across countries and continents, it dismantled the illusion of preparedness. It exposed glaring gaps in public health education, particularly revealing how deeply misinformation can embed itself in the absence of trusted communication channels. This time also highlighted the fragility of frontline response mechanisms in our country. While all of us witnessed the crumbling medical infrastructure in our country, the silent crisis was unfolding in the realm of health awareness on a community-level. 

The persistent cracks in public health education amplified the scale of suffering, leading to preventable confusion, fear and mistrust. Thus in a post-pandemic world, the real battleground in a public health crisis scenario is not just in hospitals, but in homes, schools, streets and community centres. In fact, the need for accessible and community-driven health education has never been more evident than now. 

The decline of public health education in India 

In February 2025, the United States government significantly scaled back the operations of USAID (United States Agency for International Development) by terminating a large number of its global projects. This decision sent ripples through the international development and public health sectors, where USAID has long played a pivotal role in providing both humanitarian aid and development assistance, especially in low- and middle-income countries. 

While India, with its expanding economy and increasingly self-reliant health initiatives, may be relatively insulated from the full brunt of these cuts, the same cannot be said for many nations which were heavily reliant on external support for health education, disease prevention, etc. 

The global public health community was taken by surprise. Beyond its immediate operational impact, the withdrawal of USAID funding has led to a noticeable contraction in the global public health job market. This has reduced career prospects for thousands of early-career professionals, particularly those pursuing or recently completing a postgraduation in Public Health and similar degrees in the health space. 

The withdrawal has led many international projects to cease operations, followed by limited donor funding and shrinking NGO operations. Due to this, the pipeline between public health education and employment has been severely disrupted. For students and professionals seeking to apply their expertise in global or community health contexts, this moment represents both a crisis and a call to reimagine how nations can build self-sustaining public health systems that are not overly dependent on foreign aid. 

Reduced funding for public health degrees further undermines the already limited emphasis on effective public health communication. 

Emphasising the lessons learnt from COVID 

A key challenge in India’s public health landscape that came to the fore during COVID is the disconnect between health policy and grassroots communication. Much of the public health messaging is top-down, technical and not tailored to the linguistic or social realities of diverse communities. This gap becomes particularly dangerous in crisis scenarios such as the pandemic, where misinformation spreads faster than facts and communities are left without trusted local sources of guidance. 

Since the country anyway faces an acute shortage of trained public health professionals. While doctors and nurses are integral to healthcare delivery, public health educators, field health workers, are also equally pertinent. Partnerships are key among these players, further reinforcing that health education must be localised and people-driven. 

The role of civil society is also pertinent herein. For instance, Smile Foundation emerged as a vital grassroots entity that mobilised resources, health workers as well as community volunteers to reach underserved communities. This was evident through key initiatives such as the Health Cannot Wait campaign, which provided protective gear to frontline health workers and hygiene kits to vulnerable populations.

Additionally, through our community health programmes, we sensitised communities on critical health issues via telecounselling and other outreach efforts, helping to bridge the gap between formal healthcare systems and local realities. 

These efforts put forth an example to highlight the power of decentralised, trust-based communication in times of crisis as well as the need to strengthen civil society linkages as a permanent fixture of India’s public health ecosystem. It is clear that formal education must be complemented by grassroots capacity-building, particularly in areas where formal health services are still inaccessible.

Categories
Women Empowerment

With or Without Power: The Story of Indian Women

In India, women’s progress has often been told as a story of triumph — classrooms once closed to girls now filled with ambitious students, workplaces brimming with female professionals and political platforms featuring women leaders who once would never have been given a seat at the table. On paper, the numbers speak of remarkable advancement like more women earning degrees than ever before, joining STEM fields, launching start-ups and leading social change. Laws around inheritance and workplace safety, government schemes supporting girls’ education and employment and even quotas in politics appear to cement a steady march toward equality.

But for too many Indian women, education and employment do not automatically translate into safety, respect or agency. The independence that should signal freedom often triggers resentment, stigma or violence. Women who visibly succeed are still punished for defying patriarchal expectations and institutions meant to protect them frequently fail. The paradox is striking: India celebrates women’s empowerment in headlines, while everyday stories reveal how precarious that empowerment remains.

The paradox of progress and peril

On July 10, 2025, Radhika Yadav, a 25-year-old state-level tennis player and coach from Gurugram, was shot dead by her father. Her crime was independence. Radhika had built a coaching venture, gained public recognition for her achievements and supported her family financially. In many societies, her success would be a cause for celebration. In her home, it triggered resentment and violence.

Her story is not isolated. In Odisha, a 20-year-old college student who filed a formal sexual harassment complaint against her professor set herself on fire after institutional inaction. In Pune, young women in a hostel who sought police support were dismissed, harassed and denied protection. In each case, women who showed agency — by filing complaints, by standing up, by seeking justice — were betrayed not just by individuals but by the systems meant to protect them.

The tragedy is systemic. Empowerment, when unsupported by institutional safeguards and cultural change, becomes perilous. Women’s agency may place them in greater danger if patriarchal backlash is left unchecked. This is the dissonance India grapples with today: symbolic empowerment that often collides with lived powerlessness.

Numbers behind the narrative

The statistics paint an equally unsettling picture.

  • In 2022, India reported 445,256 crimes against women — over 51 cases every hour, a 4% rise from the previous year (NCRB).
  • The national rate stood at 66.4 crimes per 100,000 population, with Uttar Pradesh topping the list (65,000 cases), followed by Maharashtra and Rajasthan.
  • Over 30,000 cases of rape were registered, with Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh leading the grim tally.
  • NFHS-5 data shows that 29% of women still face marriage-related violence, with alarming figures in Karnataka (44%), Bihar (40%), Telangana (~38%) and Manipur (39%).

At the same time, NFHS indicators on bank account ownership, mobile usage and property rights highlight progress in women’s economic and social agency. More women are included in financial systems, education is climbing and their visibility in workplaces is growing.

But the paradox of rising visibility with rising violence persists. Empowerment and vulnerability sit side by side, underlining that access without safety is an incomplete victory.

Structural failures: Laws without teeth

India has no shortage of laws designed to protect women — from the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act (2013) to amendments in criminal law following the Nirbhaya case. Welfare schemes promise support through conditional cash transfers, employment initiatives and maternal health entitlements.

But implementation falters. Workplace complaints go unanswered. Police refuse to register FIRs. Court delays deny justice for years. Social expectations continue to push women back into caregiving roles regardless of their education or employment. Too often, policies treat women as beneficiaries of welfare rather than agents of change.

The result is a widening gulf between empowerment as a statistic and empowerment as a lived reality. Women may have a bank account, but not the freedom to decide how to use it. They may have a seat at a workplace, but not protection from harassment. They may hold a degree, but not the autonomy to marry or move freely.

A global lens: India is not alone

This paradox is not unique to India. Across the Global South, women’s empowerment on paper frequently clashes with entrenched patriarchal realities.

  • In Bangladesh, rising garment sector employment has given millions of women financial independence — yet reports of gender-based violence remain high, particularly against working women.
  • In Kenya, despite women’s strong presence in informal markets, land ownership remains overwhelmingly male, constraining women’s decision-making.
  • In the United States, women occupy leadership roles in record numbers, yet face rising maternal mortality rates, particularly among Black women, pointing to systemic neglect of gendered health needs.

Globally, progress in economic participation is often undermined by stagnant or worsening indicators on safety, health and representation. The UN’s 2023 SDG Gender Snapshot warns that not a single target on gender equality is on track to be met by 2030. Less than 1% of women and girls live in countries with both high empowerment and low gender inequality.

India’s paradox is thus part of a global crisis: the risk that empowerment rhetoric outpaces structural reform.

Feminist movements and the call for gender education

If structural failures weaken empowerment, feminist movements provide the counterweight. From protests after the 2012 Delhi gang rape to campaigns against child marriage and workplace harassment, India’s women’s rights movements have consistently forced political and social attention onto issues often brushed aside.

Globally too, feminist movements have held democracies accountable. In Latin America, campaigns like Ni Una Menos mobilised millions to confront femicide. In the Middle East, women-led protests in Iran and Afghanistan defied authoritarian crackdowns. These movements demonstrate that gender equality advances only when power is contested, not when it is benevolently granted.

One enduring solution lies in gender education. Integrating feminist studies, critical thinking and gender awareness into classrooms can help dismantle harmful norms early. Schools are not just spaces of instruction, but of social conditioning. By challenging unequal power dynamics in education itself, India can build generations less bound by patriarchal structures.

Civil society’s role: Bridging the gap

During COVID-19, when formal systems collapsed, India saw the importance of grassroots organisations in action. The Smile Foundation’s Health Cannot Wait campaign reached vulnerable communities with hygiene kits and protective gear. Its community health workers conducted tele counselling and awareness campaigns when misinformation was rampant.

Beyond health, Smile Foundation’s Swabhiman programme, launched in 2005, embodies how civil society can strengthen empowerment. Swabhiman works with socially excluded women across urban and rural areas, focusing on nutrition, healthcare and livelihood. It capacitates women through community practices, enabling them to seek healthcare, earn independently and participate in decision-making. Importantly, the programme engages men and boys to challenge patriarchal attitudes — tackling empowerment as a societal transformation rather than a women-only project.

Its impact is measurable: 68 women-led businesses and micro-enterprises were created in FY24, alongside thousands of women trained in financial literacy, digital skills and entrepreneurship. Each case is a reminder that empowerment anchored in skills, safety and social awareness can translate to genuine agency.

The way forward: Beyond symbolic empowerment

So what would it take to move from symbolic empowerment to substantive equality? A few pathways emerge:

  1. Safety as a non-negotiable baseline: Without bodily safety and institutional accountability, empowerment is precarious. Police reform, gender-sensitive law enforcement and fast-track courts must be prioritised.
  2. Redefining empowerment: Policies must shift from seeing women as beneficiaries of welfare to agents of change. Schemes should embed women’s decision-making power, not just extend support.
  3. Feminist education: Gender studies should be integrated into mainstream curricula, building critical thinking around equality from an early age.
  4. Economic independence + social support: Skilling programmes must go hand-in-hand with safety nets and family sensitisation, ensuring women who step into workspaces are not penalised at home.
  5. Civil society and CSR partnerships: NGOs and corporate partners must expand outcome-driven models, pooling resources to deliver measurable change — from digital inclusion to entrepreneurship.

With or without power

India’s women today live in contradiction. They are more educated, more visible and more ambitious than any generation before. But their achievements are too often shadowed by danger, stigma and systemic neglect.

True empowerment is not about counting women in classrooms or boardrooms, but about ensuring those women can walk home safely, speak without fear and claim their rights without retaliation. It is about shifting from symbolic progress to structural power.

The choice India faces is stark, that of continuing celebrating milestones while ignoring the dangers or confront the paradox head-on by investing in safety, feminist education and inclusive systems. Civil society, movements and policy reforms together can ensure that empowerment is not a veneer but a lived reality.

Because empowerment without safety is not empowerment at all.

0%