When women in India began entering the workforce in visible numbers in the decades after Independence, their participation was framed less as a right and more as a deviation. Work outside the home was tolerated when it was necessary, respectable when it mirrored domestic roles and resisted when it threatened male dominance over wages, authority or public space. That ambivalence continues to shape women’s representation across Indian sectors today — not just in who enters the workforce, but in who stays, rises and leads.
India’s story of women at work is often told through headline contradictions. The country produces millions of educated women each year, yet has one of the lowest female labour force participation rates among middle-income economies. Women dominate frontline health and care roles, but rarely shape health policy. They are increasingly present in technology and finance, yet almost absent from ownership and boardroom power. These patterns are not accidental but the outcome of how work itself has been historically organized, and for whom.
The early resistance: Respectability, safety and control
Women’s entry into paid work in India accelerated during the late twentieth century, driven by urbanization, rising education levels and household economic pressure. Yet this entry was mediated by powerful social constraints. Research in labour sociology consistently shows that women were channelled into roles considered extensions of femininity — teaching, nursing, clerical work, caregiving — while being discouraged from physically demanding, night-shift or authority-bearing jobs.
Legal frameworks reinforced this. Protective labour laws restricted women’s night work in factories and transport for decades, ostensibly for safety, but with the effect of excluding them from entire sectors. Even as these restrictions have eased, workplace design — from lack of toilets to unsafe transport — continues to regulate women’s participation, particularly in manufacturing and construction.
Normalization without equality
Over time, women’s presence in certain sectors became normalized. Education is the clearest example. Teaching, especially at primary and secondary levels, became feminized early, offering socially acceptable employment with predictable hours. Today, women form a majority of school teachers and a significant share of higher-education faculty. Leadership, however, tells a different story. Studies in Indian academia show that women’s representation drops sharply at the level of vice-chancellors, research chairs and institutional heads, reflecting what gender scholars call “vertical segregation.”
Healthcare follows a similar pattern. Women constitute nearly 70% of the global health and care workforce, according to the World Health Organization and India mirrors this trend. Nurses, midwives, ASHAs and ANMs — almost entirely women — form the backbone of the health system. Yet decision-making power remains concentrated elsewhere. A 2023 analysis in The Lancet Global Health found that women remain underrepresented in senior hospital leadership, medical regulatory bodies and national health committees, despite their numerical dominance in service delivery.
The feminization of a sector, in other words, does not guarantee feminization of power.
The pipeline problem is not a myth, but it is incomplete
Much discussion around women’s leadership focuses on the “pipeline”: the idea that women drop out at various life stages, thinning the pool of potential leaders. This is partly true. India’s female labour force participation rate, while rising in recent surveys, remains volatile and uneven. The Periodic Labour Force Survey shows that many women enter paid work in their twenties, exit during childbearing years and re-enter later in more precarious forms of employment.
But focusing only on the pipeline obscures deeper structural issues. Evidence from corporate India shows that even where women remain in the workforce, progression slows. A 2024 study cited by The Economic Times found that over half of NSE-listed firms employ fewer than 10% women at senior management levels. This pattern persists even in sectors with strong female entry, suggesting that attrition alone cannot explain leadership gaps.
What thins the pipeline is not simply motherhood, but how organizations respond to it: rigid career timelines, penalization of breaks, informal promotion criteria and leadership cultures that reward constant availability over competence.
Technology: Access without ownership
India is often cited as a relative success story for women in technology. According to industry estimates, women make up around 35% of the IT workforce — higher than in many Western economies. Engineering colleges produce large numbers of women graduates and entry-level hiring has improved.
Yet here, too, the ladder narrows sharply. Data from startup trackers and venture capital reports show that fewer than one in twenty Indian tech startups is founded by a woman and women occupy only a small fraction of CTO or product head roles. Podcasts and interviews with women technologists repeatedly highlight similar barriers: exclusion from informal networks, bias in high-risk assignments and disproportionate caregiving responsibilities during mid-career years.
The problem is not skills. It is control over capital, product vision and organizational direction.
Male-dominated industries: Exclusion by design
If technology illustrates stalled progress, manufacturing, construction, energy and transport illustrate outright exclusion. Women constitute less than 20% of India’s manufacturing workforce and under 10% in construction and energy, according to PLFS data and International Labour Organization reviews. Where women are present, they are often informal, contractual and concentrated in low-paid assembly or support roles.
These industries were designed around male bodies and male life patterns — long shifts, hazardous conditions, mobility across sites — without corresponding investments in safety, childcare or flexible pathways. Even when laws permit women’s participation, the absence of enabling infrastructure ensures that representation remains minimal.
As the International Labour Organization has repeatedly noted, women’s exclusion from industrial leadership is less about choice and more about systemic design failure.
Leadership: Where representation finally collapses
Across sectors, the most striking drop occurs at the top. Political representation remains limited, with women holding roughly 15% of Lok Sabha seats. Corporate boards and C-suites show similar patterns, with women more likely to lead HR, communications or CSR functions than finance, operations or strategy.
This clustering matters. Leadership roles tied to budgets and asset control carry disproportionate influence. Research from the World Economic Forum consistently shows that while India has made gains in education and professional participation, it lags sharply in political empowerment and economic leadership.
Gender scholars argue that this reflects a deeper discomfort with women exercising authority rather than support. Women are welcomed as contributors, not as decision-makers.
Intersectionality: Whose representation counts?
Any discussion of women’s representation in India must confront the issue of who these women are. Caste, class, religion, geography and migration status shape access to education, work and safety. Upper-caste, urban, English-educated women have benefited far more from professional expansion than Dalit, Adivasi, Muslim or migrant women, who remain concentrated in informal labour with little visibility or protection.
When representation improves at elite levels, it often masks stagnation below. This is why aggregate gains can coexist with persistent inequality.
The care economy: The unspoken constraint
Perhaps the most under-acknowledged factor shaping women’s representation is unpaid care work. Indian women perform the vast majority of childcare, eldercare and domestic labour, a reality documented across time-use surveys and economic studies. This invisible labour constrains women’s mobility, availability and risk-taking, directly affecting career progression.
Until care is treated as economic infrastructure through public childcare, elder services and workplace flexibility, representation will remain fragile, regardless of education or aspiration.
Where this leaves India
Women’s representation in India today is neither a story of failure nor of triumph. It is a story of uneven integration into systems that were not designed with women in mind. Gains at entry coexist with resistance at the top. Feminized sectors rely on women’s labour while denying them authority. Male-dominated industries remain structurally hostile. Leadership pipelines leak not because women lack ambition, but because institutions lack imagination.
The evidence is clear across academic research, labour data and lived experience: representation alone is not enough. Power, safety, continuity and dignity matter just as much.
India’s next phase of growth — demographic, economic and social — will depend on whether it can move beyond counting women to redesigning work itself. Until then, women will remain present, productive and essential — yet still struggling to claim the authority their labour has long deserved.
Support our women empowerment programme!
